Technical question - Calculative max cost of debt for an accretive deal

Hi all,

I had a phone interview with Morgan Stanley and was stuck with this question. Assuming you have 2 firms,

Company A - P/E = 20x Company B - P/E = 10x

Assuming a 50% tax, what is the maximum cost of debt Company A would pay to acquire Company B? I understand that when you inverse the P/E multiple, you get the cost of equity. This means that the cost of equity for Company A is [1/20] 5%, cost of equity for C1ompany B is [1/10] 10%. However, I do not know how to reconcile the numbers from here. All help is appreciated

11 Comments
 

This is correct assuming s 100% debt deal. If I received this question in an interview process I would ask “what is the cash/stock/debt mix in this deal?” This is just to be extra certain you are satisfying the interviewer’s question.

Then from there you can use the weighted cost average method and simple algebra to determine the breakeven cost of debt using the same method as above.

 

Could i confirm if you are referring to 'yield' and 'cost of equity' interchangeably here? From your response, I understood it that Company A would not pay more than company B's existing cost of equity to acquire it. Therefore, it considers Company B's current cost of equity (1/10x) = 10%, and the equivalent cost of debt, less the tax shield would be 10%/(1-0.5)= 20%.

Could i confirm if this theoretical approach is correct? Cheers! Appreciate your insight on this topic.

 

No, cost of equity does not play a factor in accretion/dilution analysis. When stock (equity) is used for acquisitions, the cost of capital is considered to be zero.

You can finance an acquistion in 3 ways - stock (free), cash (cost of capital is the foregone future interest you could have earned by keeping that cash in short-term investments, etc), or debt (cost of capital is the interest rate you pay).

Now that we've covered costs of an acquisition, you need to look at what you're getting in return for those costs. If I buy a company with a 10x PE ratio, I am paying $10 for $1 of annual earnings, which means my return on investment is 10% ($1/$10). Hope that clarifies.

 

Hi all. Thanks you all so much for your prompt replies. The responses greatly informed my perspective of cost of equity, multiple expansion, and deal financing. Cheers!

 

Dolore accusamus repellendus et illo. Qui vel voluptatibus assumenda rem et nihil ullam quidem. Mollitia excepturi consequuntur totam dicta eveniet. Libero quis sit ipsum eum culpa inventore. Voluptate ut voluptatum vel et excepturi est.

Array

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.9%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (53) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (15) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”