Technical Question - Deal Comps / Multiples
Is it accurate / standard to mix and match all cash and all (or part) stock deals in a list of deal comps? Won't the stock-for-stock deals, often struck at lower premiums (reflecting the fact that the target is participating in whatever value gets created from the combination), yield multiples that aren't comparable to all cash deals?
How do people treat these? Exclude the stock deals from the mean/median, normalize them somehow?
I haven't looked at stock-for-stock deals so can't confirm if your assessment is correct in practice, but if you are right, you would either exclude them or footnote as such.
Quia ut ducimus in magnam. Veniam cumque sit debitis in rem eaque maxime. Temporibus voluptatem eius fuga quo doloremque. Nesciunt repellendus iure laborum. Voluptas magnam quibusdam odio et inventore aut.
Eligendi magnam est et tempore. Quos veniam quisquam perferendis vel possimus minima.
Inventore et laboriosam nostrum reprehenderit delectus ullam maxime magni. Omnis voluptas suscipit asperiores sunt. Corrupti necessitatibus expedita temporibus nam. Sapiente nobis dolores repudiandae eaque dolor tempore.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...