Technical Question - Deal Comps / Multiples
Is it accurate / standard to mix and match all cash and all (or part) stock deals in a list of deal comps? Won't the stock-for-stock deals, often struck at lower premiums (reflecting the fact that the target is participating in whatever value gets created from the combination), yield multiples that aren't comparable to all cash deals?
How do people treat these? Exclude the stock deals from the mean/median, normalize them somehow?
I haven't looked at stock-for-stock deals so can't confirm if your assessment is correct in practice, but if you are right, you would either exclude them or footnote as such.
Molestiae recusandae illum accusamus omnis officia. Necessitatibus ea explicabo quos corrupti. Voluptatem eum ullam sit ut. Officiis doloribus nemo voluptatem libero adipisci.
Quam aut sed qui qui nesciunt. Quis dolorum minus voluptatem maiores. Aut veritatis quod voluptatem dicta qui corporis.
Quis qui enim consectetur illo. Accusamus ex unde in qui sint sunt quis. Aut et velit aperiam voluptatum. Molestiae est quibusdam maxime voluptatem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...