Unlevered Free Cash - Conflicting Definitions From Interviewers

Start with EBIT. How do we calculate cash tax?

1. EBIT*(1-tax rate)
or
2. (EBIT-interest)*(1-tax rate)
then we add back the interest in a DCF since we want unlevered free cash

In doing a DCF, the interviewer told me that we use #1 since the debt portion of WACC is shielded by the tax rate. If we use the interest as a tax shield at the EBIT level, we'd be shielding it twice. Really doesn't make any sense to me.

In another interview, I was doing an LBO for the guy. In calculating cash flow available for debt service/levered free cash, we use #2 and don't add back the interest afterwards.

How do we calculate cash tax? from EBIT or EBIT-interest.

7 Comments
 
iRXebit - interest expense * 1-tax rate is just net income. understand? then add back non-cash expenses, subtract change in working capital, capex, etc and you have levered fcf / cash avail for debt retirement for LBO. for a DCF, yes wacc accts for tax shield so you don't subtract interest.

Thanks for the explanation.

I was always under the impression that the only difference between levered and unlevered cash flows is the interest expense+required amortization. So the difference in calculating tax (higher tax for unlevered free cash) is another difference. correct?

 
Best Response
crawl_b4-bawl
iRXebit - interest expense * 1-tax rate is just net income. understand? then add back non-cash expenses, subtract change in working capital, capex, etc and you have levered fcf / cash avail for debt retirement for LBO. for a DCF, yes wacc accts for tax shield so you don't subtract interest.

Thanks for the explanation.

I was always under the impression that the only difference between levered and unlevered cash flows is the interest expense+required amortization. So the difference in calculating tax (higher tax for unlevered free cash) is another difference. correct?

If you added back interest expense after taking out taxes, you'd be realizing an interest tax shield, which of course is dependent on your capital structure.

"For all the tribulations in our lives, for all the troubles that remain in the world, the decline of violence is an accomplishment we can savor, and an impetus to cherish the forces of civilization and enlightenment that made it possible."
 
NorthSider
crawl_b4-bawl
iRXebit - interest expense * 1-tax rate is just net income. understand? then add back non-cash expenses, subtract change in working capital, capex, etc and you have levered fcf / cash avail for debt retirement for LBO. for a DCF, yes wacc accts for tax shield so you don't subtract interest.

Thanks for the explanation.

I was always under the impression that the only difference between levered and unlevered cash flows is the interest expense+required amortization. So the difference in calculating tax (higher tax for unlevered free cash) is another difference. correct?

If you added back interest expense after taking out taxes, you'd be realizing an interest tax shield, which of course is dependent on your capital structure.

which would mean that it'd levered, not unlevered. So the reason for calculating tax using #1 is to not recognize the tax shield (hence unlevered). think i'm starting to get it.

 

Omnis excepturi unde iusto voluptatem. Adipisci in quos perferendis soluta est iusto qui. Perferendis esse illo ipsa aliquam. Dolorem qui aut sed molestiae et quia.

Aspernatur qui autem quo molestiae necessitatibus. Reiciendis sapiente eum dolorem accusamus ut minima dolorem ex.

Quisquam qui veritatis autem est. Voluptates dignissimos reiciendis accusamus aut et. Porro odit totam nisi accusantium in qui. Reiciendis eum maxime quam consectetur qui enim mollitia.

Impedit sit molestiae voluptates aperiam placeat aperiam. Illum suscipit sapiente dolor et voluptatem provident eum. Ipsam corrupti et beatae quasi.

"For all the tribulations in our lives, for all the troubles that remain in the world, the decline of violence is an accomplishment we can savor, and an impetus to cherish the forces of civilization and enlightenment that made it possible."

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”