Updated London 2025 BB/EB Tier Rankings

Have excluded Centerview/Qatalyst as their dealflow is minimal in EMEA.

SS: GS, MS

S: JPM

BIG GAP

A: Citi, BofA, PJT, Evercore

GAP

B: Rothschild, PWP

C: Moelis, Barclays, Lazard

D: UBS, Deutsche Bank

36 Comments
 
Controversial

Would put Evercore below Citi/BofA/PJT in EMEA as they rarely do €1bn+ deals originated by their London office (only usually when co-mandated with their US team, most teams are cross-atlantic), and arguably put PJT above Citi/BofA.

 

Assuming this must be FIG/GAMA? Outside of those two, Evercore LDN does predominantly £500m-£1.5bn deals. All US BBs and PJT consistently work on £2bn+ transactions which is why Evercore simply cannot be put on the same level as them.

Currently at a US BB – hardly ever see Evercore on a deal (never in my sector, anecdotally heard a few), whereas I would see the other 4 BBs all the time. Evercore US is a completely different story, would place them within the top 4 easily.

 

the tech, fig and infra teams are literally the best on the street, or among the best. infra team sold the airports portfolio and did the ardian energia deal. fig team worked on the sabadell/bbva, etc

 

bro when is JPM eventually going to rise up to the level of the other two. Seems like they are on upwards trajectory

They been consistently top two in fees for years albeit buffed up with non-M&A revenue. Feels like they get a touch on every deal even if its financing.
 

 

CVP dealflow in EMEA has been crazy last few years and the teams are expanding too. Should definitely be on the list

 

100% agree. some people dont seem to understand deal value / FTE concept. 
QP and Centerview clearly on top. 
Evercore same level with GS and MS. 
PJT clearly above JPM.
Also cannot put Moelis and Lazard on par with Barclays.  

 

Ok intern. Another invented metric that LSE hardos (usually grammar school, extremely insecure, define self-worth based on their 'prestige') invent to make themselves feel better.

Saying Evercore is the same level as GS/MS in EMEA is pathetic and typical intern trope. Evercore LDN still does transactions below €500m; GS/MS wouldn't even give deals below €1bn a wink of thought.

But according to you, MF/UMM funds will value people working on companies based in Brighton with £50m EBITDA more highly than the largest BBs that work with the largest corporates? Keep telling yourself that intern.

 
Most Helpful

OP, this is what happens when you unnecessarily include the US tag for a post about London / EMEA.

Please understand: there is quite literally no EB anywhere near the reputation of the top three in Europe. We are Europeans - we are always a few years behind the US, we generally don’t believe in “hyper-growth” companies, we are more conservative and more pessimistic, our corporates (for the most part) aren’t flush with capital, and we have significantly fewer mega-cap compounders whose only route for growth is inorganic. Historically, Americans are the risk-taking investment bankers; we are the boring accountants - just look at the founders of US BBs and the Big 4 firms.

Yes, an EB like CVP can be founded only 19 years ago and win a J&J mandate over BofA because they don’t need the extra financing, have been aggressively acquiring for decades, and can experiment with advisors that offer "truly differentiated / bespoke advice". But in Europe, our operators generally prefer to stick with the usual advisor who is cheaper and, if possible, can also provide financing or at least capital markets advice.

As for European EBs, companies here have typically existed for longer and value long-term relationships with a Rothschild that has decades of familiarity with their business, far more than the expensive American salesman trying to make a quick buck offering “super cool and unique, truly value-creating advice” to a French car component manufacturer making a simple acquisition for geographic expansion into DACH.

OP’s list is mostly correct for Europe and will continue to be so until European culture becomes more aligned with that across the pond. For the US, yes, it is much more subjective, and you can start doing all those ridiculous KPIs you’ve drafted. Realistically, there are two reasons we all pursue this career: pay and/or exits. The pay delta is materially insignificant at the junior level considering the LTV of this career, and arguments can be made that (even in the US) you are much more likely to become one of those rainmaking MDs at an EB after carving your reputation at a BB as a moderately senior MD.

In the US, PJT, EVR, and Q (for tech exits) have the best exits - this is really where per-capita KPIs mean anything at the junior level - followed by MS / GS / CVP / select JPM groups. In Europe, per-capita exits are dominated by GS / MS / JPM by a landslide, so unless you have dual citizenship, the prior sentence is absolutely irrelevant to this discussion.

Thx

 

Think using just bank name and not incorporating the team can make it quite innaccurate.

So in that vein, how do top RX players eg HL, PJT, Laz (?), etc. stack up against top groups at banks on the street

Considering for all things: technical ability, exits, reputation, deal flow, etc.

 

well thats a whole different sport

we can broadly compare banks without the team because most IB teams are the same in a given bank
 

 

Quae repellat quae esse voluptatem doloribus expedita sed. Harum quam corporis delectus velit rerum nam.

 

Quae quam quasi amet molestiae non sunt vero id. Est omnis dolore sint iste animi et. Enim voluptatem enim ipsam autem libero sed. Amet necessitatibus id suscipit error. Sint voluptatem quis maiores voluptatem illum.

Atque ut neque pariatur dolorum cupiditate. Mollitia ipsum laborum accusantium temporibus rem corporis omnis.

Consequuntur ut est ut vel. Et tenetur voluptatum voluptatum nulla. Totam expedita animi omnis accusamus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”