Updated London 2025 BB/EB Tier Rankings
Have excluded Centerview/Qatalyst as their dealflow is minimal in EMEA.
SS: GS, MS
S: JPM
BIG GAP
GAP
B: Rothschild, PWP
D: UBS, Deutsche Bank
Have excluded Centerview/Qatalyst as their dealflow is minimal in EMEA.
SS: GS, MS
S: JPM
BIG GAP
GAP
B: Rothschild, PWP
D: UBS, Deutsche Bank
| +120 | New Article: Dramatic Slide as UBS #22 (US) & New Leadership Desperately Needed | 25 | 21m |
| +96 | Americas M&A League Table Q2 Updated | 47 | 1h |
| +72 | Wealthy Parents / Jaded | 24 | 19h |
| +56 | How are hours rn for SA (interns) | 31 | 7h |
| +49 | Venezuela Debt Restructuring - LAZ vs CVP | 22 | 1d |
| +47 | A COMPLETE GUIDE TO SUMMER INTERNSHIP RECRUITING | 11 | 14h |
| +38 | Boutique firm wants access to my LinkedIn? | 34 | 12h |
| +31 | Investment Banking in Mexico | 9 | 16h |
| +26 | MM bottom bucket bonus | 9 | 4d |
| +25 | UBS GIG, LevFin, FSG Interns working Sundays and 85 hour weeks their first week? | 14 | 19h |
Career Resources
Would put Evercore below Citi/BofA/PJT in EMEA as they rarely do €1bn+ deals originated by their London office (only usually when co-mandated with their US team, most teams are cross-atlantic), and arguably put PJT above Citi/BofA.
Disagree maybe it’s different in your sector, but I see Evercore running on a lot of deals (including big ones) on the street more often than I see MS. Would lump them above Bofa and for 100% above PJT.
Bigger deals than MS? In Europe, absolutely not, In the US, maybe, depending on the year.
Assuming this must be FIG/GAMA? Outside of those two, Evercore LDN does predominantly £500m-£1.5bn deals. All US BBs and PJT consistently work on £2bn+ transactions which is why Evercore simply cannot be put on the same level as them.
Currently at a US BB – hardly ever see Evercore on a deal (never in my sector, anecdotally heard a few), whereas I would see the other 4 BBs all the time. Evercore US is a completely different story, would place them within the top 4 easily.
bro, they are still doing ~100m deals
I disagree, saying the PJT M&A franchise is better than EVR is a bit too much. I guess it depends on the vertical, but EVR FIG, Tech, HC, Infrastructure and some other verticals are very strong in EMEA
the tech, fig and infra teams are literally the best on the street, or among the best. infra team sold the airports portfolio and did the ardian energia deal. fig team worked on the sabadell/bbva, etc
tbh there is not much distinction for prestige from B tier to D tier
Completely agree. Think that’s why OP added the gaps.
Would arguably add another gap between C/D as both lower BBs have consistently been losing market share since the early 2010s.
Any thoughts on MM rankings?
Who tf cares abt that lmao
bro when is JPM eventually going to rise up to the level of the other two. Seems like they are on upwards trajectory
They been consistently top two in fees for years albeit buffed up with non-M&A revenue. Feels like they get a touch on every deal even if its financing.
PJT RSSG has been dominating again so would put them up…
CVP dealflow in EMEA has been crazy last few years and the teams are expanding too. Should definitely be on the list
Didn't Qatalyst do Darktrace, Melio, Cognigy, Nexthink?
100% agree. some people dont seem to understand deal value / FTE concept.
QP and Centerview clearly on top.
Evercore same level with GS and MS.
PJT clearly above JPM.
Also cannot put Moelis and Lazard on par with Barclays.
Ok intern. Another invented metric that LSE hardos (usually grammar school, extremely insecure, define self-worth based on their 'prestige') invent to make themselves feel better.
Saying Evercore is the same level as GS/MS in EMEA is pathetic and typical intern trope. Evercore LDN still does transactions below €500m; GS/MS wouldn't even give deals below €1bn a wink of thought.
But according to you, MF/UMM funds will value people working on companies based in Brighton with £50m EBITDA more highly than the largest BBs that work with the largest corporates? Keep telling yourself that intern.
PJT above JPM in London is a bold claim especially in EMEA
OP, this is what happens when you unnecessarily include the US tag for a post about London / EMEA.
Please understand: there is quite literally no EB anywhere near the reputation of the top three in Europe. We are Europeans - we are always a few years behind the US, we generally don’t believe in “hyper-growth” companies, we are more conservative and more pessimistic, our corporates (for the most part) aren’t flush with capital, and we have significantly fewer mega-cap compounders whose only route for growth is inorganic. Historically, Americans are the risk-taking investment bankers; we are the boring accountants - just look at the founders of US BBs and the Big 4 firms.
Yes, an EB like CVP can be founded only 19 years ago and win a J&J mandate over BofA because they don’t need the extra financing, have been aggressively acquiring for decades, and can experiment with advisors that offer "truly differentiated / bespoke advice". But in Europe, our operators generally prefer to stick with the usual advisor who is cheaper and, if possible, can also provide financing or at least capital markets advice.
As for European EBs, companies here have typically existed for longer and value long-term relationships with a Rothschild that has decades of familiarity with their business, far more than the expensive American salesman trying to make a quick buck offering “super cool and unique, truly value-creating advice” to a French car component manufacturer making a simple acquisition for geographic expansion into DACH.
OP’s list is mostly correct for Europe and will continue to be so until European culture becomes more aligned with that across the pond. For the US, yes, it is much more subjective, and you can start doing all those ridiculous KPIs you’ve drafted. Realistically, there are two reasons we all pursue this career: pay and/or exits. The pay delta is materially insignificant at the junior level considering the LTV of this career, and arguments can be made that (even in the US) you are much more likely to become one of those rainmaking MDs at an EB after carving your reputation at a BB as a moderately senior MD.
In the US, PJT, EVR, and Q (for tech exits) have the best exits - this is really where per-capita KPIs mean anything at the junior level - followed by MS / GS / CVP / select JPM groups. In Europe, per-capita exits are dominated by GS / MS / JPM by a landslide, so unless you have dual citizenship, the prior sentence is absolutely irrelevant to this discussion.
Thx
.
Moelis is nowhere in Europe and certainly not at the level of Barclays, Lazard, UBS etc. Just have a look at the deals they do relative to any of those - they simply lack scale and have very few deep relationships relative to the more established names. Turnover at MD level is another sign that not all is well there.
Agreed moelis should be D tier or even below.
Think using just bank name and not incorporating the team can make it quite innaccurate.
So in that vein, how do top RX players eg HL, PJT, Laz (?), etc. stack up against top groups at banks on the street
Considering for all things: technical ability, exits, reputation, deal flow, etc.
well thats a whole different sport
we can broadly compare banks without the team because most IB teams are the same in a given bank
evr chemicals, UIT, FIG, tech. London are doing multibillion dollar deals all the TIME. stop hating! yes, they may do the mid-market deal too. But thats because they are playing the long game! they know these mid market firms at 500m valuation will be 1-2bn firms in 5 years!
Quae repellat quae esse voluptatem doloribus expedita sed. Harum quam corporis delectus velit rerum nam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Quae quam quasi amet molestiae non sunt vero id. Est omnis dolore sint iste animi et. Enim voluptatem enim ipsam autem libero sed. Amet necessitatibus id suscipit error. Sint voluptatem quis maiores voluptatem illum.
Atque ut neque pariatur dolorum cupiditate. Mollitia ipsum laborum accusantium temporibus rem corporis omnis.
Consequuntur ut est ut vel. Et tenetur voluptatum voluptatum nulla. Totam expedita animi omnis accusamus.