WB Bonuses
Early looks today. How's everyone feelin?
Trending Content
| +2,296 | Bank of America - Juniors Strike to start Monday May 6th | 243 | 5s | |
| +682 | BOFA ALREADY TRYING TO COVER UP THEIR TRACKS | 73 | 1h | |
| +457 | This is a dark day for Wall Street. | 30 | 53m | |
| +158 | Big Layoff at Barclays - 5/1/24 | 86 | 11h | |
| +119 | “Americans just work harder” | 54 | 22h | |
| +102 | Analyst at Bofa FIG-Thoughts | 8 | 4h | |
| +100 | Shame on you, BofA. But also, the industry needs to change. | 15 | 45m | |
| +97 | BofA List | 18 | 24m | |
| +72 | Sleeping on Jefferies??? | 35 | 23h | |
| +60 | What's up with RBC nowadays? | 28 | 20h |
Career Resources
Lol
Doesn’t sound good.
Details?
Following
Friend at GS got less than $25k. Got a pit in my stomach…
At what level?
MaNaGiNg DiReCtOr
following
Not great. Will let others share their number at their own discretion.
I guess this is their version of layoffs. There will be a lot of people quitting next month.
Heard WB is restructuring.. is that true?
Bankruptcy? Highly doubt that - news would have broke by now
Bump for analyst / aso bonuses
Bump
Following
Hate the bumping or following. Just one question, is it over or under half of the bonus from last year? And how's A2A?
Heard was really bad
Hearing associates at <$75k. Not sure if that's Asocc 1 or 2 but either way not great
Credible source says multiple under 50k, associate 1s, not stub
This was pretty similar at Baird. Associate 1 made 20-50% of base. Bloodbath.
Was under $50k average or bottom bucket for associate 1?
bump
Associate 1 - 25k-50k (top-mid bucket) Bonus, people are going to be quitting left and right.
This can’t be real dawg wtf
I also heard $25k from an assoc 1. Heard $60k from an assoc 2
Heard 40 from an ASO 1 who was told middle bucket
If 25k for ASO1… then what’s it for AN1 😳
Is this just stub?
No. Full ASo 1
Understand the sentiment but where are they going to go?
Corporate gig where you work half the hours for 3/4 the pay?
Heard AN2 40k mid bucket
How does this line up w associate numbers above?
Heard the same, analysts and post mba associates getting similar size bonuses, pretty wild. Rewarded A2As on completely different scale (still down heavy)
Banks will regret jacking up base so quickly. Inflation is real but somehow AMs and several PE shops didn't raise base. And when TC is adjusted down people wil be like why work hard if more of comp is certain (in base vs. bonus)
Deadass you think that fr?
Umm. That's the only way to think about it - Total Comp, period. Ever heard of bonuses coming from fees? What is so hard to understand about the limitations of a finite fee revenue pool? They don't just print money out of thin air.
Definitely interesting. Don’t disagree with this thought process. Increasing Base pay may have reduced banking productivity due to the inherent change in bonus expectations.
Counterpoint tho is that some banks / groups paid 100%+ on the increased base. (Some kid at an EB in secondaries - see mega thread). Also don’t think productivity is an issue ->Just printer stopped going “brrrrr”. M2 money supply down, first time in history, as well.
Thanks for a real response unlike the poster above. Big caveat - I don't know if the following is accurate but can be done by pulling financials for some of the public advisory platforms. When you say paid 100% bonus on higher bases - that was for a banner year where most people were completely slammed. A more meaningful metric would be to adjust for headcount and fees. Ratio of Fee / Headcount plotted against Total Comp / Headcount and / or looking at Comp as % of Fee Revenue. Also don't forget the banks hired a lot of folks, so even if fee is back to 2019 (again, not sure if true - would be interesting to see full year earnings), you still have more mouths to feed than 2019 staffing levels. When fee is compressed, you adjust some combination of headcount and TC; with base salaries rising, you are forced to pay lower bonuses (before cutting into HC).
I prefer having a higher base (guaranteed money every month) than the uncertainty of a bonus that meets my expectations.
.
Even though bonuses aren’t hitting in-line with general IB expectations, can we really be expecting to see people quitting and lateraling out of their shops? Given current macro conditions and layoffs across the street there is a strong pool of talent that is looking to find their next gig which I feel creates a relatively competitive market to try and make a move. In that regard I feel like job security is everything right now (especially at the junior level).
Curious to hear if other have similar or different perspectives
Would say you’re not totally wrong, but at this level, there are jobs that pay 3/4 at 2/3 the work. People leaving are less likely to just lateral to an new bank and see it as not worth it. Alternative is roll the dice for another year of break neck pace to hope comp comes back up a year from now…
This. Bank's know you don't have other options and even if you do, they need to reduce headcount anyways.
None of the Top or Mid Bucket were cut.
Layoffs are mostly the dead wood and bottom bucket.
I get your point but this argument doesn't really hold water.
it's pretty subjective who's mid bucket and who's bottom bucket. I bet among hundreds (or is it thousands at this point) of people laid off from various banks (mainly top banks like GS/MS), there are a few very solid people, let's say 200-300 high quality finance professionals who are looking for jobs now, and there are not many finance firms hiring now. so, I would agree that even with laughable bonus, it's a bad time to quit your place and search for a different job.
You know it's bad when no one is actually wanting to say what their bonus was. It's all anecdotal.
Lol, IK, Anonymously. But usually when it is bad. Ppl come back a couple of weeks later after they digest.
Even when bonuses are 25k?
I think you can only interpret bonuses this bad across the board in a few ways. And before people point to how it isn’t that bad and fees are down etc, no reputable bank should be paying anything close to 25% of base as a bonus. An associate making
Option A is this is essentially a layoff, they know a decent chunk of people will look for the door ASAP now and they avoid the cultural issues of a layoff. This is dumb to me since you risk losing your good talent as well and the lazy analysts stick around, but that’s just me. Also if this is the case you would think they’d still pay up for top performers (and it doesn’t sound like top bucket was much better).
Option B is that WB (and others) are just screwing juniors because they can - job market clearly sucks and there’s a bunch of recently laid off BB juniors looking for jobs right now. No one in their right mind would quit without something lined up and the lateral market is basically closed, tech hiring basically stalled, PE/GE funds are generally hiring less, etc. Essentially banks finally have leverage again after 2+ years of needing to suck up to junior bankers and they’re taking advantage.
Anyway it certainly leaves a bad taste in my mouth, some banks out there have chosen to continue to pay juniors because it’s not fair to punish them for a decline in firm revenue but WB and others have chosen to punish juniors. Sucks for all the juniors who got a bad number this year
Option b would undoubtedly lead to very poor performance, would it not? No way that’s a smart move by a bank
as long as deals are closed, banks will make fees. poor performance doesn't matter if the deal is closed. and great performance doesn't matter if the deal is not closed. from the financial standpoint.
probably both
Seems like William Blair and Baird are rlly the same shit- "Good culture" but love screwing juniors over whenever they can
Doesn’t make them look much better that GS
.
Yah. That’s rough.
Good lord, so are you looking at the exit door or wait till the lateral market opens again?
That's insane, wow
what did he say
What about VP?
I read the thing from Day man like this is literally what we could afford to pay you this year/we know the next few years will be down and are comfortable letting a decent number of ppl leave on their own accord.
Guessing you were subsidizing underperforming groups.
The issue with WB (and Baird, no different) is that in 2021 they were doing a bunch of $500M-$1B deals which obviously pay a lot more, but when the economy tanks they go way down market and do a lot of
So it means a bunch of juniors worked just as hard but bank top line numbers sucked, and bonus pool evaporates. Crappy situation for juniors.
Also hard because many BBs paid similar bonuses, but the difference at those banks is they aren’t chasing $100M sell-sides. My friends at BBs are working way less so it’s at least a bit more fair IMO to give a bad bonus
Can only speak for Blair, but fees were down nowhere near the cut in bonuses. Not saying bonuses shouldn't have come down. But the relationship you're describing doesn't really hold true for my group
What % of base was WB at around? 15-50% band and overindexing in the front half?
so is the bank management making more this year than last one then? or where does the difference go?
Bro we’re not working a lot less, getting clapped dog fr
Just lol at working for a bank like William blair.
As opposed to where? Goldman Sachs?
They’re a good group. Sounds like bonuses are just low across many banks this year.
Bump
Is it bad across all groups?
Not sure about the variance between groups but I think the difference between top and middle bucket was big this year. I don't want to disclose how much I got but it was more than most A1-2 numbers I've seen here (as a top bucket AN2).
Must be a way for them to “layoff” lower bucket talent rather than actual layoffs
Most people only work at a firm for 2-3 years before heading to their next opportunity. Could see groups paying a larger bonus only to the more dedicated / higher performing folk.
interesting that the split is so wide...would you be able to disclose how your bonus compares to last year roughly?
I’ve heard of two top bucket associates getting sub $100k bonuses so I don’t think this is true.
This is really unacceptable on the part of WB (and RB), and bad management
private partnerships need to take care of their employees in a way public companies have stopped. I get it at MS where frankly associates get the training and the brand and you had to protect the producers. At WB etc you simply have to comp better.
Bad management decisions.
WB (Baird too) have also always prided themselves on above-street pay, and that shouldn’t just go out the window in a bad year.
The numbers here are worse than most (if not all) BBs I’ve seen, and way off from EB levels.
It’s inexplicable to me. This is the environment when private partnerships should be making themselves the safe haven / employer of choice. I am all for differentiation in down markets and protecting top performers but it seems like even they got screwed.
Curious to see how many quit once bonus hits.
People that mention quitting - would you leave banking or lateral banks? Curious because I imagine both are slowed down now.
.
Re points above regarding Private Partnerships and “restructuring”.
My take is WB is conserving money. If LevFin markets remain practically “closed”, I don’t see sponsors being able to close a lot of deals at 10-12% paper. We are in the hands of Yellen and Powell, who are in hands of Congress. Aka Santos and Co….
Agreed. That’s the issue with building an entire IB practice off sponsor backed businesses. Worked great during the historically low interest rate period of 2010-2022 but not sure how business will be going forward.
You might not like it but this is the prudent way of managing a business. You don't pay your employees large bonuses when there is presently a lot of economic uncertainty and your core clients are not doing deals because the leveraged finance market is shut down.
This is a cyclical industry guys. We don't get paid well when conditions are this bad. It sucks having to work like slaves and not get compensated well for it but that is the risk we all signed up for.
Put yourselves in the shoes of an owner of a business and think honestly about what you would do in this situation. If you would pay your employees strong bonuses in these conditions then you are either dishonest or a moron
Gosh thanks for letting us know that in down years we should expect lower bonuses. Crazy nobody’s mentioned that in this thread.
If you’re still playing catch-up, here’s a few things we’re discussing:
-communicate guidance downward instead of parading around for months slapping yourself on the back about it being the second best year of all time with record backlog “we held up WAY better than those pesky BBs!”
-don’t reward people who are literally mailing it in for months at a similar level as people who are busting their ass, think for two seconds about the precedent this sets for your average and above performers heading into a new year
-consider how you will be perceived from a culture standpoint when that’s all you brag about throughout recruiting (hint: full of shit)
-don’t give totally bogus feedback as a way to justify the lower bonuses, we’re fucking adults you can explain the situation
Agree with all of this. I’ve had to manage through some rough bonus cycles and the key thing is never screw your top performers. And always be totally straight on communication.
In that case, then you treat your top junior performers as real partners. Explain the challenges, explain your are conserving cash and cut people in on future upside. Promote early when deserved. Esp at the Associate and VP level, people will think long term like adults.
What is with people on this thread?
You work at William Blair dude.
Get over yourself and be happy you were not fired.
I admire your commitment to surpassing Pussy Galore's volume of asinine commentary, but this one is really on another level of retardation. You are supposedly an accomplished IBanker, yet seem to possess the social skills of an autistic 4th grader. What gives?
Seems an equal amount agree with me, then disagree.
Hows your job search going as a prospect?
Any luck?
Everyone throwing shit on this is needs to gain some testicular fortitude
That’s not exactly the strong point of the kids on here.
A3
25% bonus on 125k base
As a senior with some exposure to how this stuff works. I honestly don't get it.
The biggest mistake isn't lower bonuses. People expect that.
What does damage is the minimal delta between bottom bucket and mid and mid bucket and top.
Clearly a stupid decision. I remember at Jef they used to pay bottom bucket zero bonus and give their money to top bucket.
Jef has its problems but this was always a smart way or getting rid of the shit people, incentivising mid bucket to work hard enough to not be bottom bucket and keeping top bucket for as long as possible.
Appreciate your perspective and makes sense.
For me there are two categories of lower bucket but should be completely distinct: 1) guys that are trying but just not getting it, tons of mistakes, sloppy, etc. 2) guys that are legitimately just not doing work, constantly MIA, etc.
For group #2 to be making within like 10-15k of peers who are giving it their all is so insulting its crazy. So you're telling me I could have just not shown up to the office for 3 weeks, shut my laptop at 11pm and gone unresponsive, and that's all it would have cost me?
Were ASO1 full year bonuses (ie, joined summer 2021) really 40k? If so that would be the same as AN2 mid bucket.
Post-MBA associates yes, seems that way. A2As were compensated at a higher level
Top bucket this year is key. No one is really posting top bucket #s but they aren’t that bad at many of the firms people are talking about here. Doesn’t make things easier but it’s key to be doing more than just sitting and crunching, your team and firm and group all need to know you and like you in years like this.
What happened to 'MMs pay more than BBs?' Look at you now, you're underpaid and work at a mediocre bank.
Damn bro. Salty much? Let’s try to be positive & supportive
They are all banks at the end of the day. Who cares.
RE: there being basically one bonus band and zero differentiation.
unfortunately this isn’t 2005 or 2015 anymore and the world has moved on. Banker clients view the product as a complete commodity (which it is) and give zero fucks about your “differentiated view” or worthless pitch book (sorry to offend).
today in 2023 banking is a complete commodity and information flows exponentially faster than it did even several years ago. Your clients have more visibility than you and know more than you.
When capital markets are shut, banking is a 0% value add business. When they’re open, it’s a 5% value add. Again, sorry that’s just the way the world is.
Banking is in a long structural decline and is a dying business.
Long, structural decline yet 2021 best year ever for fees? Checks out.
One year does not a trend make
Houston had 4 banks completely close their energy office with more set to happen.
most banks had solid tech teams running up the revenue - not their consumer groups.
how is your heralded TQQQ options strategy going?
It’s easy to pile on WB for their shitty comp but to say banks are 0-5% incremental value add is ridiculous
It’s actually going well, thanks for asking.
The idea that clients view banks are 0-5% value add is the worst kept secret in finance. Did I just open up the world for you? Lol
So does this mean I have a shot at lateralling from my crappy boutique to WB next year? I assume they're already bleeding employees.
Nope. U.S. lateral openings are effectively shut until further notice.
looks like they're trying to get rid of people, not get new ones
Hey I did say I'd wait a year. Might not be enough time for the market to have picked up again though.
That’s why I always say, base is king
^^^ Damn you people. Go back to your shanties!
sorry for asking dumb q's. whats WB? and can someone explain what stub bonuses are? ty
William Blair figured it out lol
Can confirm morale is at an all time low - most people didn’t get their number on Friday but rumors are (obviously) spiraling out of control so everyone is completely freaked out and gossip is crazy about what to expect. Already hearing from nearly everyone that they’re starting to try to recruit out - we’ll see how that pans out given the economy, but it’s not good. William Blair has a very much “work hard and you’ll be taken care of” culture, and I think this bonus means a lot of people are losing trust in the institution
Most of the people I've spoken to at the junior level have said they're out and going to start actively looking for an exit, some are people I know are high performers too
Where do you see most associates exit?
Is it fair to say everyone is looking to leave across all groups?
yes
The view on WSO of being able to effectively lateral because bonus numbers are bad seems to be completely divorced from the reality on the street.
Sure - some banks will be investing and doubling down in certain areas, but the lateral market is very quiet / dead right now and expect it to remain that way for a few quarters. I also don’t think the pain from layoffs is over, so be careful moving to a new shop now and being first out the door when another round of layoffs is announced.
Whats WB, Warburg Bincus?
Despite the number of posts on here, we still dont have many numbers. Can ppl share what they got?
shhhh... let them mourn in private
Bump let’s hear some numbers please. At a MM and considering leaving since I’m expecting a shit bonus and this lifestyle is making me depressed.
whats the word
Seconding what someone else said about top bucket actually being ok. Obviously not good and way down from 21 (of course), but more in line with what I expected and actually pretty solid vs what I’ve seen from competitor threads.
Not going to give a number since I was told there weren’t many people at my number but it was felt pretty fair honestly.
Seems like more of the carnage was at the associate level - I’m sure there were some decent numbers there that aren’t being shared, but seems like the vast majority were bad and a lot of bottom bucket numbers
A friend at WB who got 180k+ bonus last year (top bucket) as an Analyst 3 / new A2A (forget how they classify it). Got like $60k this year as a full year Associate 1 (top bucket again). I know he moved offices between last year and this year so not sure if he was reporting to the same people, stayed in same group.
Almost incomprehensible if it is actually a high performer. It is one thing to drop folks who you never really see contributing at a senior level, but it is another to hit the top performers. Historically not a great strategy.
.
A3 promoted to AS1
40k bonus
Hoping more people post numbers
ASO2 -> ASO3
$85K
Let’s get some actual numbers on here
deleted
what are your ASO bonuses looking like
Blair and Baird paid outrageously in 2021. They probably think they can pull back and point to how well they pay in good years. Also - I could be wrong, but I got the sense they also hired a decent amount in early 2022. Which means guaranteed comp to new seniors and less for everyone else.
Where are all these people that are unhappy about their bonuses gonna go? Nobody is hiring. Sure there could be some quiet quitting or whatever…but the job market might be a rationale for management.
Vel repellat sit autem veniam ad itaque. Ratione rem deserunt iure est debitis sint deserunt. Dolor incidunt accusamus animi est modi magnam est. Molestiae beatae recusandae et qui dolor corporis qui. Ut voluptas tenetur quaerat voluptatem nemo ut molestiae in. Autem ut rerum voluptas expedita soluta ut. Optio quod qui error et et dolorum excepturi.
Ex doloribus voluptatibus a non non quae ullam. Ipsum consectetur neque sit.
Dolores totam ut sit in. Est vel voluptas dolorem repudiandae ducimus. Quos ut nisi minus eos sit. Fugiat at in ipsa possimus. Cupiditate inventore sint ipsa.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Eveniet facilis quis eaque molestiae voluptatem ex odit. Magni molestiae eveniet ducimus. Et consequatur cupiditate maxime neque ab debitis perferendis.
Recusandae eos vel quisquam dignissimos ad. Aperiam voluptas in enim autem quia. Quos earum eligendi dolor cum aliquid et autem.
Earum sint et et esse aut sed. Et at quam corporis aliquam. Harum quam et eos eius vero et voluptatibus totam. Omnis et voluptatem culpa unde sit iste rerum.
Alias dolor officia sit a quisquam alias optio. Corporis id cumque rerum doloribus iure voluptatem rem. Suscipit autem fugit voluptates rerum tenetur explicabo odit. Et fuga voluptates eligendi ipsum ad corporis.
A consequatur similique suscipit ipsam. Adipisci non eveniet culpa rerum.
Quia sed dolorum voluptatibus quia. Expedita commodi mollitia ducimus placeat molestias adipisci velit repellat. Dignissimos doloribus et adipisci quo itaque quam qui. Quia dignissimos sit quia eos dolorum. Modi cumque maiores aperiam maxime. Vel voluptatem modi minima laudantium.
Dolores sunt est neque. Aut ea et quod sunt sapiente. Provident laborum sit porro voluptatum. Consectetur magni est ut ea natus praesentium.
Velit voluptate ratione nisi veniam omnis. Quibusdam optio minus exercitationem omnis commodi omnis. Cum voluptatem occaecati deserunt. Eos unde aut ut quis beatae est nulla.
Doloribus aut exercitationem et sint. Nam illo fugit dolorem nesciunt aut. Maiores et et eos recusandae molestiae ad. Tempore modi aut est ea et. Vero odio iusto vitae voluptate architecto.
Voluptas dolorem provident fuga esse quia voluptate et. Commodi pariatur et consequuntur sit. Similique aut pariatur similique vel voluptatum animi. Consequuntur et voluptatem fugiat minima.
Ad consequatur atque inventore sed quo et eligendi. Alias blanditiis occaecati maiores modi. Officia ut repellat voluptatibus nobis ea aspernatur nihil.
Qui nostrum tempore est velit ea esse suscipit debitis. Recusandae accusamus explicabo sit mollitia quos cumque. Repellendus sunt autem et maiores eos minima qui. Sit eos perspiciatis omnis sit et quo. Fugit repellendus vero placeat ex tempore quae neque.
Inventore in consequatur unde. Magni et qui quia provident consectetur. Dolores tempora nisi ea voluptatem.
Dicta quas et et non corrupti iste. Voluptas autem eveniet voluptas accusantium voluptatem error. Quae ex et quis labore incidunt consequatur laborum.
Incidunt numquam sit fuga quam quia pariatur. Et est id repellendus et in accusamus. Hic libero tenetur vero excepturi quos natus eius. Distinctio unde doloribus soluta sed ut aspernatur eos.
Voluptas neque at aut tempore ut eum nobis. Dolorem rerum dolor sunt facilis exercitationem. Unde excepturi eaque vitae. Perspiciatis accusantium quod commodi sint. Laboriosam ut eum non et laboriosam doloremque debitis.
Quam nihil dolores odio. Deleniti sed sequi quasi sit enim veniam. Asperiores aut et suscipit et fugit veritatis.
Corporis commodi temporibus omnis earum sit similique. Qui soluta incidunt aut repudiandae iste et sed. Perferendis in maxime odit cumque possimus animi voluptatem. Nemo consequuntur voluptatum voluptatem laudantium.
Quidem quod architecto recusandae aliquam illum eos delectus. Quia facere nemo amet harum voluptas. Libero consequatur eos in veritatis aliquam sit sed. Et ipsam ipsam impedit hic et voluptas.