What are the dumbest/ least value add edits you’ve received on a deliverable?

Everyone knows between the models and the bottles and the truly glamorous life of an investment banker, there are comment turns that make you question your reality at 2am in a bathroom stall. Comments such as: 

  • This entire deck needs to have squares with rounded edges instead of square edges
  • Plz globally change all dates from dash format (7/23/2021) to words (July 23, 2021)
  • Quick nit: globally ensure all numbers go to two decimal places instead of one and tie. Thx.
  • Need to make longer (team any ideas for additional slides?)
  • Change title from “expand market opportunity” to “enlarge market opportunity”
  • Fix bullets to be not filled in circles from filled in circles

What are some other truly useless/ least value add comments you have ever gotten?

69 Comments
 

I mean, as much as I love Oxford commas, they are a big NO in IB and overall business writing.

Thanks incoming analyst.  This is entirely incorrect. 
 

Comes down to personal preference

 

I can't believe this is the kind of stuff people sit around at 10pm/however late waiting for only to stay up in the wee hours of the night. I mean, obviously you have to if MD asks for it, but this just seems so useless to me. Why would any of the points OP listed need to be changed? Is this what people are routinely up late for?

 

OP here. Two reasons this happens:

  • Someone who doesn’t add value and doesn’t want to step on any toes by making a real change, wants to show they contributed so they provide comments to show they did something
  • Someone who lacks an understanding of the bigger picture and has nervous energy so they want to make odd edits to marginally improve the product

As a note, I’ve never had a rainmaker MD make comments like the ones listed. Those guys usually are too busy and end up moving the conversation to a discussion anyway rather than walking through slides.

 
Funniest

M&A associate emails me:

"Swap the order of the distro list / I should be higher on the page than the sector team associate; I am a third year associate, he is second year"

I make change.

Sector associate emails me

"Hey, I should be higher on the distro list, please adjust. Sector team always goes above M&A as we lead client relationship"

I hate banking

 

its pretty common for bankers to get worked up about this

the amount of comments you get on a stupid team page for a pitch are ridiculous

"I should have "Head of Exclusive Sales" as well by my name, not just managing director"

"Please place the APAC banker team below the EMEA team (from a London banker)"

"I am actually now the global head of chemicals in addition to being the AMER Industrials group head, please also include that title by my name.  If you don't have space, please remove the associate"

"Why am I as an executive director at the bottom of the team page?  I should be moved up, please remove all analysts as well -  we need to keep this to a concise group of team members, thx"

Such insecurity from so many bankers

 

I was once asked in PE to make a revenue build for an LBO which was by country and then by SKU. No matter who you are you can't do this with any degree of certainty. I was also asked to provide rationale for each growth assumption. Total BS exercise which helped accomplish nothing other than adding more variables into our model. No one can forecast things on a SKU level with any degree of certainty lol.

Forecasting in general is always a crapshoot any is really useful imo when evaluating downside scenarios but yeah, totally useless

 

So many. a few that stand out:

1. universally changing it so ranges are represented by n dashes instead of hyphens (i.e., changing "2015 - 2021" to "2015 – 2021" 

2. universally changing all page titles and table labels from title case (i.e., first letter of each word capitalized) to sentence case (i.e., only first letter of first word and proper nouns capitalized)  

3. New VP who had recently joined the firm from a different bank and made us do all of these random formatting quarks of that bank's template Only to have to change back after the MD sees the deck. My favorite was that the VP didn't like our color pallet so we had to universally change our primary color for graphs to a different color. 

4. changing a bullet 5 minutes before we need to print the decks from "the Company has ample opportunity to take significant market share" to " there is ample opportunity for the Company to take significant market share"

5.  right before we need to print the decks, telling me to recut my income statement to breakout each line item within the "other expenses" line I create to capture 5 expense categories that collectively represent like 6% of OpEx that was properly footnoted to explain what was included. Ditto for an "Other Assets" line on my balance sheet

6. being asked to pull precedent transactions on situations so esoteric that there's maybe 1 other truly comparable deal ever done. Then having to send MD lengthy write up of screening methodology and explanation for why no comps. For a situation where the client said they want to be the first company to ever do x when they hired us, so dont think they would be surprised to hear that there are no precedents

7. universally changing all black font text from 0-0-0 to 10-10-10 and all gray from 60-60-60 to 80-80-80

8. My all time favorite. last minute comments to update the MD's bio page such that we referred to him as mr. lastname instead of his first name and to add some BS about Mr. lastname being the preeminent banker in xyz space

 

A company listed in the legend of a chart as a 4-letter acronym (won't say the company for obvious reasons)... MD asks me to change to their also-used 3-letter acronym instead. For reference, the 4-letter acronym is the one used across their entire website, but for some reason he thought the 3-letter one was better.

 

I think its just shitty culture passed down over the decades. I try to shield my interns / analysts as much as possible from the stupidity that comes from above (comments like the ones you see above) but its so deeply engrained in some people. We had an associate join recently that's an absolute cunt and you can see how much he's destroyed the culture of our office. On the bright side, it gives me a chance to bond with my interns / analysts as we get the opportunity to talk shit about him and make good meme content. Bonding over hate is a powerful drug.

 

Same thing happened to me. We were pitching a Canadian company to one of our clients. Meeting was set to start at 3pm, got on a late call with VP and MD at 1:45pm. “Everything looks great, the team did a great job on this book. One final comment, the EBITDA numbers seems too low, lets change all the financials back to CAD from USD, it will give it more volume… have it on my desk by 2:50pm”. I told them it wasn’t gonna happen . Are you kidding me? Like a client won’t know the difference between CAD and USD.

 

1. Global comment literally on the final turn of the deck: "Please add periods to the end of all footnotes"

2. MD's comment on his bio: "Please go back and add more of my deals to my bio so that it isn't the shortest on the page" 

3. MD's comment on a 20+ person team page: "Think you can try squeezing in pictures for everyone? If you can't find one, feel free to use whatever is on their LinkedIn" 

 

Just saying, none of these feel that out of line on what sounds like a bake-off.

  • Periods/no periods on footnotes/bullets is generally a firm standard thing, and the MD will call it out.
  • More deals on bio...annoying but could look weird if presenting with what looks like less experience. 
  • Photos...SUPER annoying to be sure, but generally team page has photos. If it's me I kick it out to graphics team if possible who is way faster than me/even the analyst on formatting
 

Have received most of the ones already mentioned - additional couple that I hit the wall on were "Go through and change all '$ & Share Counts in Millions' to '$ and Share Counts in Millions' and 'Change the fill between table rows to a slightly darker gray throughout'

Same VP who gave those two also dropped 'Change $mm to $M and $bln to $B throughout commentary.'  Wasn't a matter of inconsistency where both were being used, was '$mm' every time throughout the deck.  I was mad at the time but felt like a fool when the lender followed up saying "We were on the fence w/ this deal, still think that the borrowing base will be insufficient and the covenant package isn't market, but the "$M" throughout the materials allayed our concerns.  Please send wire instructions - we don't even need to do diligence." 

 

1. Please change MD's picture, he looks too young in this one. (Yeah sure, let me just phone up his wife if she has a more recent one, wtf)

2. Deck signed off by MD's. Associate calls me: I think we could better space up slide 1-2-3-4. Can you amend that?

3. Pitching a financing for a football team. "Can you please make the logo smaller? I hate that team and don't want to see such a big logo"

 

1. Please change MD's picture, he looks too young in this one.

That’s an absolute first. I remember when I was an analyst and one of the MDs would flip out if we used his internal headshot instead of his preferred one from 20 years ago in a completely different style from everyone else’s on the page. Fucked up the flow of the entire slide. Good times. 

 

Nisi eaque vel error quas nisi omnis dolorem culpa. Nesciunt aliquid esse doloremque molestiae tenetur ut molestias. Quod iure nihil occaecati voluptates odit veniam.

Commodi odio magnam ut id non ratione commodi. Occaecati qui rerum nisi nam optio molestias corrupti eos. Aut et vitae omnis mollitia harum. Odit aut voluptas eveniet facilis.

Architecto quaerat sit perferendis eveniet possimus necessitatibus. Amet maxime vel aut et voluptas rerum provident rem. Ex ut consequuntur quo dolores iste accusamus et excepturi. Recusandae temporibus fugiat expedita sed impedit. Voluptas id perspiciatis temporibus voluptas. Quae temporibus consequatur placeat culpa sed delectus deleniti.

 

Quae perferendis tempora dolor et. Laudantium debitis labore nam officiis vel et adipisci. Nihil quia optio dignissimos ratione.

Cupiditate fuga nostrum quod et quibusdam a aut. Et amet odio quo dolores consequatur dolore aut. Numquam qui voluptates sit vel aut. Ut non cumque aperiam harum perspiciatis. Rerum repudiandae perspiciatis officia soluta.

Quo esse veniam hic soluta. Ab eius deleniti cupiditate incidunt. Qui enim vero earum quae officia.

Aut et dolore corrupti odio molestiae. Aperiam dolorem temporibus asperiores saepe. Qui tempora voluptatem totam amet reiciendis. Est vitae accusamus hic qui reprehenderit. At fugit fuga quasi repellat temporibus placeat enim.

 

Non omnis ipsam laboriosam eaque. Laudantium quaerat non distinctio a natus. Quo perspiciatis neque delectus veniam.

Corporis et sit magni blanditiis. Aut iste est sunt labore sunt magnam. Aut voluptas sunt voluptas et laborum.

Veritatis quasi fugiat vero consequatur totam. Et voluptatem voluptatibus aut minus accusamus qui odit. Cupiditate officia et dolore neque laborum autem.

Laborum fugit voluptatem amet tempora. Earum unde aliquam deserunt sed maxime optio sint qui. Modi facere qui magnam quo beatae voluptas incidunt. Corporis laborum in necessitatibus quo vel excepturi. Hic accusamus nesciunt est quaerat dolorem quaerat.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 03 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (53) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (15) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”