What are the dumbest/ least value add edits you’ve received on a deliverable?

Everyone knows between the models and the bottles and the truly glamorous life of an investment banker, there are comment turns that make you question your reality at 2am in a bathroom stall. Comments such as: 

  • This entire deck needs to have squares with rounded edges instead of square edges
  • Plz globally change all dates from dash format (7/23/2021) to words (July 23, 2021)
  • Quick nit: globally ensure all numbers go to two decimal places instead of one and tie. Thx.
  • Need to make longer (team any ideas for additional slides?)
  • Change title from “expand market opportunity” to “enlarge market opportunity”
  • Fix bullets to be not filled in circles from filled in circles

What are some other truly useless/ least value add comments you have ever gotten?

 

I mean, as much as I love Oxford commas, they are a big NO in IB and overall business writing.

Thanks incoming analyst.  This is entirely incorrect. 
 

Comes down to personal preference

 

I can't believe this is the kind of stuff people sit around at 10pm/however late waiting for only to stay up in the wee hours of the night. I mean, obviously you have to if MD asks for it, but this just seems so useless to me. Why would any of the points OP listed need to be changed? Is this what people are routinely up late for?

 

OP here. Two reasons this happens:

  • Someone who doesn’t add value and doesn’t want to step on any toes by making a real change, wants to show they contributed so they provide comments to show they did something
  • Someone who lacks an understanding of the bigger picture and has nervous energy so they want to make odd edits to marginally improve the product

As a note, I’ve never had a rainmaker MD make comments like the ones listed. Those guys usually are too busy and end up moving the conversation to a discussion anyway rather than walking through slides.

 
Funniest

M&A associate emails me:

"Swap the order of the distro list / I should be higher on the page than the sector team associate; I am a third year associate, he is second year"

I make change.

Sector associate emails me

"Hey, I should be higher on the distro list, please adjust. Sector team always goes above M&A as we lead client relationship"

I hate banking

 

surely the guys who actually do this realise how cringe it is? I would lose all respect for any co-worker who went to that hassle

 

its pretty common for bankers to get worked up about this

the amount of comments you get on a stupid team page for a pitch are ridiculous

"I should have "Head of Exclusive Sales" as well by my name, not just managing director"

"Please place the APAC banker team below the EMEA team (from a London banker)"

"I am actually now the global head of chemicals in addition to being the AMER Industrials group head, please also include that title by my name.  If you don't have space, please remove the associate"

"Why am I as an executive director at the bottom of the team page?  I should be moved up, please remove all analysts as well -  we need to keep this to a concise group of team members, thx"

Such insecurity from so many bankers

 

i lost respect for both of them well before this, it was truly icing on the cake

i almost screenshotted and shared with litquidity it was that bad

i ended up just sending the slide to one of the associates to work on

 

I was once asked in PE to make a revenue build for an LBO which was by country and then by SKU. No matter who you are you can't do this with any degree of certainty. I was also asked to provide rationale for each growth assumption. Total BS exercise which helped accomplish nothing other than adding more variables into our model. No one can forecast things on a SKU level with any degree of certainty lol.

Forecasting in general is always a crapshoot any is really useful imo when evaluating downside scenarios but yeah, totally useless

 

So many. a few that stand out:

1. universally changing it so ranges are represented by n dashes instead of hyphens (i.e., changing "2015 - 2021" to "2015 – 2021" 

2. universally changing all page titles and table labels from title case (i.e., first letter of each word capitalized) to sentence case (i.e., only first letter of first word and proper nouns capitalized)  

3. New VP who had recently joined the firm from a different bank and made us do all of these random formatting quarks of that bank's template Only to have to change back after the MD sees the deck. My favorite was that the VP didn't like our color pallet so we had to universally change our primary color for graphs to a different color. 

4. changing a bullet 5 minutes before we need to print the decks from "the Company has ample opportunity to take significant market share" to " there is ample opportunity for the Company to take significant market share"

5.  right before we need to print the decks, telling me to recut my income statement to breakout each line item within the "other expenses" line I create to capture 5 expense categories that collectively represent like 6% of OpEx that was properly footnoted to explain what was included. Ditto for an "Other Assets" line on my balance sheet

6. being asked to pull precedent transactions on situations so esoteric that there's maybe 1 other truly comparable deal ever done. Then having to send MD lengthy write up of screening methodology and explanation for why no comps. For a situation where the client said they want to be the first company to ever do x when they hired us, so dont think they would be surprised to hear that there are no precedents

7. universally changing all black font text from 0-0-0 to 10-10-10 and all gray from 60-60-60 to 80-80-80

8. My all time favorite. last minute comments to update the MD's bio page such that we referred to him as mr. lastname instead of his first name and to add some BS about Mr. lastname being the preeminent banker in xyz space

 

A company listed in the legend of a chart as a 4-letter acronym (won't say the company for obvious reasons)... MD asks me to change to their also-used 3-letter acronym instead. For reference, the 4-letter acronym is the one used across their entire website, but for some reason he thought the 3-letter one was better.

 

I think its just shitty culture passed down over the decades. I try to shield my interns / analysts as much as possible from the stupidity that comes from above (comments like the ones you see above) but its so deeply engrained in some people. We had an associate join recently that's an absolute cunt and you can see how much he's destroyed the culture of our office. On the bright side, it gives me a chance to bond with my interns / analysts as we get the opportunity to talk shit about him and make good meme content. Bonding over hate is a powerful drug.

 

Can we convert all numbers in deck(a detailed 40 page pitch deck) to Japanese yen instead? Should be Quick change, id like to see in the next 1 hr.

Bro wtf.....

 

Same thing happened to me. We were pitching a Canadian company to one of our clients. Meeting was set to start at 3pm, got on a late call with VP and MD at 1:45pm. “Everything looks great, the team did a great job on this book. One final comment, the EBITDA numbers seems too low, lets change all the financials back to CAD from USD, it will give it more volume… have it on my desk by 2:50pm”. I told them it wasn’t gonna happen . Are you kidding me? Like a client won’t know the difference between CAD and USD.

 

1. Global comment literally on the final turn of the deck: "Please add periods to the end of all footnotes"

2. MD's comment on his bio: "Please go back and add more of my deals to my bio so that it isn't the shortest on the page" 

3. MD's comment on a 20+ person team page: "Think you can try squeezing in pictures for everyone? If you can't find one, feel free to use whatever is on their LinkedIn" 

 

Just saying, none of these feel that out of line on what sounds like a bake-off.

  • Periods/no periods on footnotes/bullets is generally a firm standard thing, and the MD will call it out.
  • More deals on bio...annoying but could look weird if presenting with what looks like less experience. 
  • Photos...SUPER annoying to be sure, but generally team page has photos. If it's me I kick it out to graphics team if possible who is way faster than me/even the analyst on formatting
 

Have received most of the ones already mentioned - additional couple that I hit the wall on were "Go through and change all '$ & Share Counts in Millions' to '$ and Share Counts in Millions' and 'Change the fill between table rows to a slightly darker gray throughout'

Same VP who gave those two also dropped 'Change $mm to $M and $bln to $B throughout commentary.'  Wasn't a matter of inconsistency where both were being used, was '$mm' every time throughout the deck.  I was mad at the time but felt like a fool when the lender followed up saying "We were on the fence w/ this deal, still think that the borrowing base will be insufficient and the covenant package isn't market, but the "$M" throughout the materials allayed our concerns.  Please send wire instructions - we don't even need to do diligence." 

 

1. Please change MD's picture, he looks too young in this one. (Yeah sure, let me just phone up his wife if she has a more recent one, wtf)

2. Deck signed off by MD's. Associate calls me: I think we could better space up slide 1-2-3-4. Can you amend that?

3. Pitching a financing for a football team. "Can you please make the logo smaller? I hate that team and don't want to see such a big logo"

 

1. Please change MD's picture, he looks too young in this one.

That’s an absolute first. I remember when I was an analyst and one of the MDs would flip out if we used his internal headshot instead of his preferred one from 20 years ago in a completely different style from everyone else’s on the page. Fucked up the flow of the entire slide. Good times. 

 

Eum tempore temporibus porro velit praesentium et cum. Alias corporis sed incidunt quasi dolor. Voluptatem necessitatibus in sed beatae ut voluptate occaecati.

Sed maiores debitis sed eveniet tempore voluptatum. Suscipit porro in aliquam voluptas. Ut voluptatem nihil nisi perspiciatis unde sit accusamus.

Et quae et magnam qui. Eligendi quisquam autem sed commodi tempora aliquam. Saepe at omnis velit quasi.

 

Neque et assumenda eius architecto eligendi. Id qui rerum ea ea ut. Quisquam reprehenderit saepe ipsam aut maxime ut. Soluta officiis commodi in impedit nulla. Praesentium vel voluptas exercitationem non qui doloribus.

Qui eos ut dolores consequatur dolores corrupti. Porro sint non qui iure. Eligendi commodi id consectetur qui culpa nesciunt.

Nihil quas aperiam itaque corporis. Vitae quasi illum quisquam dolor. Quia voluptatem eligendi qui vel aut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”