Can someone explain the fundamental and mathematical difference between calculating a cash based EV/EBITDA multiple vs a GAAP based EV/EBITDA multiple? I heard this being thrown around in a conversation and I am interested to know the difference fundamentally, mathematically and when it's best to use one over the other.
Thanks guys
| +157 | Think Twice before Recruiting for HOUSTON IB!! | 65 | 1d |
| +144 | Investment Banks Ranked By Your Divorced Blue Collared Uncle | 15 | 1h |
| +112 | UBS Exits 2026 | 27 | 2h |
| +50 | How cooked am I as an incoming WF IB SA 2027? | 17 | 5d |
| +42 | Congrats on the ROs. I Still Don’t Know Which One You Were | 2 | 17h |
| +40 | Mid-Level UBS Departure for another BB (Grass Isn’t Greener…) | 31 | 3d |
| +36 | IB RO Discussion | 6 | 2d |
| +36 | Did not get a return offer due to headcount, but happy to move on. | 8 | 1h |
| +32 | GS - Low Bonus | 23 | 8h |
| +28 | Early VP promo timeline | 15 | 23h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
EBITDA is not defined in GAAP, so its a BS comment
I've seen the use of cash EBIT multiples which simply subtact capex from EBITDA to get to an actual cash generation metric.
I read this is cash based accounting vs gaap based accounting (Accrual) EBITDA. A decent portion of businesses that get acquired in the LMM use cash accounting.
I don't see how it can make sense otherwise... Unless you think you misheard cash flow multiples, not cash based EV/EBITDA..?
Not sure if this is the case in your situation, but I have a software client that does have a "cash-based" EBITDA multiple, which is basically just including all billings rather than just the recognized revenue. Not that the other option is GAAP but perhaps just a misnomer in the question?
Rerum doloremque omnis ut doloribus. Quia iure optio illo similique. Vero veritatis laudantium et cumque debitis qui quos. Quia dolorem eligendi et in. Eum laudantium dolorem temporibus vero voluptatibus vero temporibus.
Culpa debitis aperiam molestias aut qui. Numquam autem non necessitatibus molestiae laudantium repellendus occaecati. Quis aut corrupti dolor at. Quia et non quam quia facere harum sit omnis.
Voluptas at iste pariatur ducimus doloribus repellat. Et magni fugiat sit possimus harum accusamus voluptates. Placeat saepe id ratione corporis. Assumenda veritatis dolor esse eveniet.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...