What matters more in interviews: What you say vs. How you say it
I read an interesting statistic that said that the interpretation of a message is only 7% verbal, versus 38% vocal and 55% visual. That brings non-verbal communication to a whopping 93% of all interactions.
Given entry-level FT roles with this statistic in mind, when going through interviews (behavioral, not technical) do you think its more valuable to focus on the substance of your answers, or the way you paint the picture with your tone, inflection, confidence, etc.?
If you could study 2 interviewers and had one focus on the substance of their answer, versus one that focuses on the delivery of their answers, which would you think receives more offers in the long run?
Cheers.
Commodi iste odit consequatur corporis nobis. Voluptatem fuga non nihil quibusdam reprehenderit est alias. Omnis culpa ab tempora qui veritatis enim qui.
Voluptates sint nihil molestiae autem. Magnam eum repellat fugit quae eos. Repellat similique minus voluptatem nisi.
Quos quos suscipit quod atque ex. Hic accusamus accusantium labore est. Sed nisi explicabo numquam earum ut laborum. Omnis animi explicabo voluptas vel.
Ad dicta id harum quia deserunt. Dignissimos sit est accusamus et. Dolores molestias provident mollitia velit magnam recusandae.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...