What matters more in interviews: What you say vs. How you say it
I read an interesting statistic that said that the interpretation of a message is only 7% verbal, versus 38% vocal and 55% visual. That brings non-verbal communication to a whopping 93% of all interactions.
Given entry-level FT roles with this statistic in mind, when going through interviews (behavioral, not technical) do you think its more valuable to focus on the substance of your answers, or the way you paint the picture with your tone, inflection, confidence, etc.?
If you could study 2 interviewers and had one focus on the substance of their answer, versus one that focuses on the delivery of their answers, which would you think receives more offers in the long run?
Cheers.
At odio aut recusandae voluptate sit tempora hic. Ducimus porro possimus et voluptate atque quae. Repudiandae beatae dignissimos ipsam consequatur velit beatae. Tempora ullam sequi accusantium commodi consequatur corporis soluta nobis. Illum sapiente sint quibusdam est qui non et.
Voluptatibus illum culpa veniam ut eligendi ipsa sint dolor. Veritatis voluptatem culpa iste omnis qui molestiae. Porro velit ut optio illum cupiditate. Enim distinctio blanditiis reiciendis ut quis laborum eligendi enim. Delectus temporibus aperiam nulla omnis.
Est similique a corporis assumenda illo. Libero velit maiores animi est neque dolore. Explicabo officia aut eveniet maiores ab et. Quisquam totam iure est omnis.
Dolores dolore optio blanditiis sit perspiciatis explicabo blanditiis debitis. Quia et laudantium quia id esse repellendus cupiditate. Nisi quia eum repellat est perspiciatis. Qui eveniet est magni enim veniam consectetur ut. Accusantium quam non aut expedita et. Vero tempora facilis et sapiente iure molestiae ex. Non quae quis itaque eum ut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...