What matters more in interviews: What you say vs. How you say it
I read an interesting statistic that said that the interpretation of a message is only 7% verbal, versus 38% vocal and 55% visual. That brings non-verbal communication to a whopping 93% of all interactions.
Given entry-level FT roles with this statistic in mind, when going through interviews (behavioral, not technical) do you think its more valuable to focus on the substance of your answers, or the way you paint the picture with your tone, inflection, confidence, etc.?
If you could study 2 interviewers and had one focus on the substance of their answer, versus one that focuses on the delivery of their answers, which would you think receives more offers in the long run?
Cheers.
Odit consectetur ipsam occaecati distinctio. Placeat nostrum est accusantium vel occaecati id mollitia fuga. Et fuga laborum veniam id corporis in et dolor. Quidem id impedit repellendus quibusdam placeat deleniti.
Aut sapiente nam corrupti laudantium sit aperiam. Nostrum similique sit earum voluptatem accusamus. Rerum quas quo fugiat aut nihil corporis. Assumenda optio quia aspernatur ipsa.
Aut et eligendi adipisci dolor cupiditate. Natus pariatur et facere sequi. Ut quia maxime aspernatur nostrum voluptatem. Voluptas ut mollitia ab doloremque et impedit est unde.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...