What metrics would you look at to figure out if a company is in financial distress

and also What would you look at on a 10k to figure out if a company is distressed or about to be distressed or What is an asset or security that has a negative beta?

13 Comments
 
Best Response

Tough restructuring interview question. Usually when a company is in distress you will want to be looking at its liquidity situation and assessing whether or not the company will be able to meet its debt obligations (interest payments and maturity). Interest coverage ratios are great to use here to see if the company is generating enough cash (EBITDA) through its operations. You could also use FCF, fixed charge ratios, etc. Covenant ratios are also very important, but its always a pain in the to read through the credit agreements. If I'm not mistaken, breaching covenants is also a technical default.

On the 10K, you might want to read into the company's notes to figure out how much debt the company has, whether the interest is PIKable, rates, and maturity date. CP is also pretty important, especially if the company is unable to refinance and roll back the debt (one of the many causes of the Circuit City Ch. 11).

Gold is an asset that has a negative beta...

 

Don't you think covenants are somewhat useless because creditors and companies almost always renegotiate their covenants when the company is about to breach covenants?

-------------------------------------------------- "Whenever I'm about to do something, I think, 'Would an idiot do that?' And if they would, I do NOT do that thing." -Dwight Schrute, "The Office"-
 
BespokeAnalyst2010Don't you think covenants are somewhat useless because creditors and companies almost always renegotiate their covenants when the company is about to breach covenants?

They renegotiate if covenants were too tight and the company can prove it has adequate liqudity. It's still worth looking at them because depending on the covenant in question there might be a penalty involved. Also breaching covenants is typically a sign that performance has deteriorated.

Obviously it isn't the only thing you'd look at but it would also be unwise to ignore it.

 
BespokeAnalyst2010Don't you think covenants are somewhat useless because creditors and companies almost always renegotiate their covenants when the company is about to breach covenants?

The fact that a company has to renegotiate covenants or financing at all is already a sign it's in distress..

Examples: Cemex, HeidelbergCement, Manitowoc - you wouldn't say any of these companies were not in distress..

Common ratios: Net debt/equity Net debt/EBITDA (as well as all the variants of this e.g. senior [insert one of a plethora of criteria]debt/EBITDA, etc) Net debt/FFO EBITDA/EBIT/FFO interest coverage

Others: CDS prices Forecast EBITDA vs. debt maturity schedule Covenants in general

 

Interest coverage ratios Leverage ratios/covenants debt trading prices upcoming events i.e. coupons, maturities Deterioration in operating performance.

 

Regardless of whether the company and its lender group renegotiate the covenants through an amendment to its credit agreement, the simple fact that that process needs to take place or the ratios are close to threshold levels will always be an indicator of a company in financial distress

 
mrb87Fuck the ratios and look at liquidity and upcoming maturities. You're not distressed if you can't go bankrupt.
if you break a covenant / ratio then creditors can accelerate; you'll have a maturity (a massive one if cross default in play).
"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper
 
Oreos
mrb87Fuck the ratios and look at liquidity and upcoming maturities. You're not distressed if you can't go bankrupt.
if you break a covenant / ratio then creditors can accelerate; you'll have a maturity (a massive one if cross default in play).

Yes, I agree with that. But it depends to a large extent who the holders are and how they are spread around (how many guys are cross-dressed vs. holders of a single security/class)? Obviously bank debt carries the most restrictive covenants, and if it's still mainly in the hands of banks, they're probably happy to amend-and-pretend.

That said, if we were 25% holders, we would be happy to look for ways to accelerate :D

 

Besides the good responses above (generally, leverage is the first place to look)... do what the accountants do to predict bankrupcy -- Altman's Z-score: WC/Assets, RE/Assets, EBIT/ASsets, MarketCap/BV, Sales/Assets. Apparently there's some other thing called an O-score but I haven't seen anyone use it.

Currently: future neurologist, current psychotherapist Previously: investor relations (top consulting firm), M&A consulting (Big 4), M&A banking (MM)
 

Quia reiciendis delectus velit facilis ut. Quaerat saepe quo error eligendi quia. Est perferendis tenetur ea et ea quia. Corporis maxime quas laboriosam sint. Id est dolorem omnis explicabo blanditiis ut voluptatem.

Id quam a incidunt commodi delectus rem quia. Illum vitae dolorem unde praesentium omnis possimus tempore quas. Voluptas adipisci adipisci consequuntur suscipit similique. Consectetur explicabo voluptas occaecati. Quasi consequatur pariatur architecto voluptatibus illo. Placeat ratione accusantium id ad dolores ut. Fugiat iste quis officiis cum ex est quos.

Culpa similique est et ut necessitatibus. Corporis necessitatibus nulla consectetur. Ex aliquid sint fugiat laborum. Commodi et corrupti sunt corporis. Voluptatum perferendis sint ea nam. Omnis voluptatem ea velit ipsam aut dolorem. Aliquid eligendi voluptates reiciendis odio rerum sint eos velit.

"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (56) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”