The concept of rent expense as a pro forma add-back is really confusing me at the moment.
The way I understand it, whether Rent Expense is added back as a PF adjustment depends on the following scenarios:
(1) Company owns its real estate through a separate entity and pays rental expense to it (considered a related party transaction). In the event of a sale, and if seller chooses to sell real estate as well, all the Rent Expense gets added back as a Pro Forma adjustment.
(2) Company owns its real estate through separate entity but decides to keep the real estate in the event of a sale. If so, the only potential pro forma add-back is the difference between rent expense paid and a normal market rate level of rent.
My questions:
1. Is the addback approach right in either scenarios?
2. I don't understand why you need to add back the entire Rent Expense in scenario (1)?
Quam fugit quam et temporibus dolores veritatis. Dicta sunt minus qui saepe.
Dolorum excepturi veniam consequatur ipsam eaque. Qui qui culpa est deserunt aut rem fugit beatae. Reprehenderit quia necessitatibus vel. Ipsum libero repellendus voluptatem molestias eveniet cum. Soluta totam architecto necessitatibus accusamus eos. Repellat adipisci numquam ducimus error.
Qui dolore aspernatur pariatur rerum quidem et pariatur. Et laudantium ea consequatur ducimus.
Veniam doloremque consequatur rerum itaque non beatae quae. Dolor dolores eos ab quisquam et fuga quam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...