The concept of rent expense as a pro forma add-back is really confusing me at the moment.
The way I understand it, whether Rent Expense is added back as a PF adjustment depends on the following scenarios:
(1) Company owns its real estate through a separate entity and pays rental expense to it (considered a related party transaction). In the event of a sale, and if seller chooses to sell real estate as well, all the Rent Expense gets added back as a Pro Forma adjustment.
(2) Company owns its real estate through separate entity but decides to keep the real estate in the event of a sale. If so, the only potential pro forma add-back is the difference between rent expense paid and a normal market rate level of rent.
My questions:
1. Is the addback approach right in either scenarios?
2. I don't understand why you need to add back the entire Rent Expense in scenario (1)?
Voluptas quas facere similique distinctio sed libero adipisci. Sint officia minus qui consequatur laborum tempore occaecati et. Ipsum mollitia asperiores delectus qui praesentium eum.
Nihil debitis aliquam magni pariatur officiis. Vel ut voluptatem odit. Perferendis provident occaecati quis in. Nihil eum fugiat in corrupti totam sed dolores. Voluptatum quaerat laboriosam voluptatem perspiciatis architecto. Inventore doloremque omnis eveniet natus cum iste quisquam repellat. Dolorum ut accusamus quia quas libero et sint.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...