108 Comments
 

Same situation, have a friend there and he gets rocked with the hours in the tech group. He said great culture but extremely long hours

 

Canaccord's growth is legit. I have their latest marketing materials in my inbox. CG's tech group completed 130+ transactions during the past year. I've heard great things about the culture at CG too.

 

Baird is up 300% this year in terms of total IB fee revenue, largely driven by M&A. They are also doing increasingly larger deals.

 

Saw a recent thread that Baird’s culture is still incredibly brutal. Did their policies change?

 

I would disagree with them having a brutal culture. Don't think many banks have a culture as strong / stronger than Baird.

Hours have been brutal over the last year or so, but that's largely market driven coupled with some mis-timed layoffs heading into COVID.

 

Baird has protected Saturdays and a pretty strong culture. My friend lateraled there and said the hours improved tremendously from his old MM, and that the culture was much better (e.g., chiller, nicer dudes). I know a handful of people working out of Baird Chicago and they all speak very highly of the culture. I have heard Milwaukee (Baird's HQ) is sweaty from an ex-Associate there. 

 
Funniest

thank you for the comments interns, prospects and analyst 1s

 

PJT/ CVP/ MOE/ PWP are some of the younger/ faster growing independents… each have mass deal volume/ Revenue with little headcount. Also, firms are both growing in # of employees and partners. A few are public which helps their cases too.

 

Lol what? Objectively that's untrue. Over the past 5/6 years PWP's revenue has grown at 10% YoY, which is objectively slower than other public non-BBs like Evercore, PJT, Moelis, Jefferies, and Houlihan Lokey. PWP's had a good 2020/2021 but people's memories are way too short and forget that besides Greenhill PWP's been arguably the most inconsistent independent advisory firm over the past decade, alternating between years they absolutely knock the ball out of the park and lackluster years.

 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 

SVB Leerink. Their HC group is increasingly doing big deals, they just started their Tech IB practice in September and have already advised on sizable deals and have poached a ton of senior banker and rainmakers, they’ve just opened offices in SF and Nashville, and this morning they just announced that they acquired MoffettNathanson, the most well regarded tmt equity research boutique. I don’t think any other firm mentioned on this thread has made as many significant growth moves as SVBL has in 2021…

 

SVB Leerink - already mentioned in this thread, but they've built up their IB like crazy over the past year. They've been poaching seniors like crazy, built out an entire new Tech group, and this year has just been the beginning of their explosion in growth.

GS - They've been focused on growing their advisory arm for some time now, and they intend on increasing annual advisory revenues by like $500M through setting up regional coverage offices. 

Jefferies - They've gone from a T1.5 MM to having more IB revenue than DB and UBS over the past decade, and they show no signs of slowing down. They've been poaching like crazy over the past few years.

Guggenheim - Their MM division has been growing like crazy over the past couple of years. Heard the Chicago office is already up to 40-50 bankers while ATL is around 20 now.

 

Surprised to see Jefferies mentioned so late in the thread. Agree that their growth has been pretty wild. They've gone from what was a pretty crappy bank besides HC and Energy to an all-around "mini-BB" that's competing against the BBs now. They'll live and die on their IB division, so I don't see their growth slowing any time.

Also surprised that JPM wasn't mentioned. JPM's done a great job leveraging their BS to win over clients and relationships from other banks. They've also done a great job creating synergies between their IB, CB, and PWM, and have really established themselves as a one-stop-shop for MM clients through their regional IB practice.

 

Definitely RBC, they're #1 on global league tables for both M&A and SPAC in fees AND volume when you adjust it to only European and Canadian deals between 170MM to 472MM excluding TMT and Healthcare with an overweighting towards Canadian M&A and adjusting fees for per target school capita and discount FX rates.

 

100% agree with you about Truist. They’re starting to make a name for themselves, but it’s still early.

Id argue a good part of Jefferies recent success is due to pitching inflated valuations. That strategy won’t keep working in the long run

 

Not in IB but I've heard incredible things about Tobin & Co. Many refer to them as the Louisiana Tech of EBs

 

Any one that works there or even thinks about working there must be a cuck, a cock and ball torture enthusiast, and a diaper fetishist.

 

a big thank you again to all the analyst 1, interns, prospects and students commenting. please keep them coming.

rest assured, i am reading all of your comments and appreciate your insights. 

edit: why am i getting downvoted? i'm being serious.

 

I have been following your comments, and you have absolutely no right to trash on analyst 1s. They know 10x more than you. You have asked some extremely dumb questions on this forum and are clearly an extreme prospect that doesn't "get it". Apologies for being brash, but seriously man, age and experience is not the only determinant of professional competence. 

 

Voluptate rerum dolores sed sint. Voluptate et repudiandae suscipit consequuntur. Et maxime fugiat quas numquam ab tempore voluptatibus et.

Quia voluptas in et quas ratione dolores cumque. Ut itaque earum illo.

Cum consequatur laudantium quod voluptatum et. Est repellendus fugiat labore odio voluptas quasi. Qui vitae officiis qui deleniti dolore molestiae possimus.

Array
 

Et quia voluptatum quod. Doloremque suscipit fugit quia dolorum laborum.

Placeat deserunt laborum ut voluptas asperiores sit quo. Placeat dolorem pariatur minus iure. Magni est sit quis fugit nobis. Placeat soluta consequatur aut laboriosam. Incidunt nulla doloremque tempora qui.

Neque nemo et ut reprehenderit. Fuga sit dolore magni nihil non. Aut quis autem quia qui. Qui error officiis magni magni ut ratione. Non a odio vel voluptatum rerum. Rerum culpa porro blanditiis qui.

Quam eligendi in est repudiandae nostrum. Fugit recusandae consequatur tenetur et quia. Quo eos laborum minus vel consequatur quia minus. Dolorum dolor eius nesciunt veniam quis est nesciunt.

 

Quod et ducimus ipsum blanditiis modi dolores. Neque iure dignissimos debitis libero modi eius deserunt dignissimos. Inventore vel adipisci aliquid id odit vel. Minima vel dolorem nihil omnis omnis eveniet. Et nesciunt sed deleniti fugiat. Quo facilis est perferendis perspiciatis rerum reiciendis veritatis.

Corrupti temporibus quis laborum nihil. Et dolorum id rerum tempora minima voluptatum. Labore enim quos blanditiis dolorem quasi dolorem. Cum magnam amet neque et velit nihil. Sit provident sequi magni est et qui quia. Et incidunt quia dolores provident debitis autem quo esse.

Sit ea amet minus minus. Laboriosam corrupti dolorum tenetur placeat aliquam ipsam. Ut eaque aliquid aut dolorum velit.

 

Quo et maiores ratione consequatur laboriosam et. Optio blanditiis officia praesentium aut et ea veniam. Omnis quaerat sint eum omnis. Minus ut fugiat perferendis sed. Est culpa molestiae doloremque doloribus dolor dolorem. Reprehenderit ipsam sunt pariatur illo.

Saepe est architecto voluptatum dolores repellendus quibusdam molestiae. Ratione distinctio sit tempora doloribus. Odit iure et ea quis. Dolore sed magni a tempora voluptas similique. Ab quia qui expedita numquam voluptatem soluta autem. Aut porro nihil commodi eum dolores laboriosam quaerat dicta.

Ut hic dignissimos ex minima consequatur unde. Nobis repellendus deserunt at amet nihil. Voluptatem ipsa consequatur corrupti eos sunt. Molestias in sint et sint dolore consequuntur. Eveniet sit alias eos aliquid necessitatibus tempore qui.

Qui excepturi deserunt sint nobis. Tenetur dicta est ad veniam quo earum. Consequatur est blanditiis tempore voluptate impedit error eius est.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”