Why aren't Men entitled to diversity hiring? (Women are 60% of college students and 70% of high school valedictorians)

Clearly it's much harder to be a successful male student right now (those stats I posted are 100% facts).

More successful women to draw from.

Why aren't we using diversity programs to hire males.  They are minorities by a 60% to 40% ratio at college campuses.

Who should I talk to at my bank to start this program?

8 Comments
 
Most Helpful

Break this down for me - there are much more men in finance than women.

ok.

Why are we targeting 50/50 male/female in finance?

Is the applicant pool 50/50 male/female? No. 

Is the eligible pool 50/50 male/female? No.

Is career interest in finance 50/50 male/female? No.

Do people who study subjects relevant for finance (finance, business, economics, maths/eng for quant/trading etc.) split 50/50 male/female? No. 

In all of the above, the population skews towards males.

-

Are there any female-dominated industries diversity hiring men? No. 

Are there any "less glamorous" jobs (oil rig workers, prison guards, construction workers, plumbers) diversity hiring women? No.

Are there any female-dominated "glamorous" jobs (vets, pharmacists, academics) diversity hiring men? No.

Is the client base (e.g. assuming you're hiring for SS IB, facing PE clients) 50/50 male/female? No. 

Is there any competition-driven or business-specific reason that there is a 50/50 target? No (obv. there are some ESG funds that only invest in companies with boards that have x% females etc. but we're assuming that this is only for grads)

-

So why is high finance aiming for 50/50? 

 

I don't really care what target proportion it should or shouldn't be, nor am I arguing the merits of diversity hiring as a practice - my point is that if you're endorsing someone saying DIVERSITY hiring should be for men when there are already much more men than women in the workplace, the term 'diversity' no longer makes sense.  Who cares if there are slightly more women at schools then men, hiring is done by the workplace who want diversity in the workplace.  That's like saying banks should hire the 5 white students at Howard because they're underrepresented.  

 

Who cares if there are slightly more women at schools then men, hiring is done by the workplace who want diversity in the workplace.

This is your definition of what defines "diversity" and it's backwards looking. Compensating for unequal gender distribution of the current workforce. 

What if it should be defined as forward-looking? 

Then using OP's silly reductio ad absurdum of more females with college education than males, we must assume diversity hiring must target the disadvantaged males. 

-

I'm just pointing out the logical fallacy of gender-equal diversity recruiting. 

To me, assuming all else equal, it makes less sense than diversity hiring from a lesser college-educated pool of candidates 

 

expecting proponents of diversity discrimination to logically justify themselves is a fools errand. they are fighting to push straight white men out of power, and it is not, at its core, because they believe it logically makes sense. it is because it benefits them and their political views, and they will do whatever it takes to further their ideology.

 

Vel aut beatae magnam quis corrupti ipsam. Dignissimos ratione magni cupiditate totam minus aut sunt suscipit.

Numquam ullam ea ab esse porro facere tempore. Distinctio dicta facilis maiores quia ut officiis expedita. Vel impedit velit fugit exercitationem perspiciatis. Officia consequatur sint quam qui. Deleniti itaque voluptatem eligendi eaque voluptatem. Illum ut commodi hic hic.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”