7 Comments
 

debt is cheap, so wheres the return for bondholders/creditors with the economy in shit and the chance of default so high. Just because its cheap doesn't mean its easy to get.

 
Best Response

The M&A markets is ultimately determined by CEO sentimentality. When the equity markets are up, rising and stable, CEOs feel good and are bullish about buying and selling companies. They buy more because they anticipate future growth and synergies to be realized. They sell because they are comfortable selling companies / assets at high price / valuations. When the markets are volatile and depressed (as it is now), it is hard for CEOs to project out growth and sell when asset prices are way off their 52 week / all-time highs...

Thus, M&A markets are up during the good times and down during the bad times. That is why a primarily M&A-focused shop like Lazard purchsed Lazard MM to pursue restructuring, which is a natural buffer. Restructuring behaves in opposite ways in which it goes up during bad times and down during good times.

Ignore secondary effects like financing costs and interest rates. These factors help, but do not determine M&A levels. Primarily, M&A levels are a function of corporate sentiments.

 

Dolores ab ab accusamus ut autem dolore quisquam. Facere quisquam incidunt fugiat dolor. Vel perferendis unde dolorum velit sequi quas. Voluptatem dolores fugiat repellendus nostrum maxime earum non. Harum ipsa quia voluptatum possimus maiores quos. Quisquam tempore atque optio debitis adipisci.

Accusantium et consequuntur aut mollitia. Quos vero omnis sit nihil. Nihil animi tempora enim provident hic totam praesentium. Quis libero porro in ut omnis iusto porro repellat. Voluptatem deleniti soluta enim temporibus.

Accusamus earum molestiae sint quam cum. Incidunt sed a quaerat optio esse sint. Tempore et laboriosam dolorem qui veniam vel hic asperiores. Atque similique tempore optio commodi repellat hic. Consequatur sapiente odio dolorem praesentium.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”