Why is Baird singled out?

100 hours week is the norm in IB (definitely hell hole but unfortunately true), especially in MM. HL, William Blair, Jefferies…. But what about Baird makes it bad enough to be in WSJ?

Not shading WSJ, just curious why this specific firm?

12 Comments
 

It’s not. It’s insane. And I can tell you from my very own experience one of the MMs I mentioned above is much worst. It was so bad we were warned from discussing it publicly. Lawsuit threatened.

My point is, these banks are getting away with it because no one speaks of it. Singling out Baird is a good starting point ig but an article that talks about collective experiences across these banks is much more impactful no?

 

It's very simple, people like to lean into these reputations; both anecdotally in person and online. Yes, they have a horrible culture but there are, of course, other teams that have similar experiences. The main thing with this case is, however, that some of the stories were absolutely insane and ultimately... someone made the decision to speak to the WSJ. Most people choose not do so to avoid a witch hunt. Props to whoever did here

 

I agree that the stories I saw in the Baird thread were not that off from what I have seen across this industry. I think what sent the Baird one over the edge is that the stories had a bit of uniqueness to them and were so widely known that it gained a lot of steam. Yes, there are so many toxic VPs in the industry, but how many adjusted their toxicity based on losing sports bets on the Pirates? That extra touch sent it over the edge in my opinion.

 

Voluptatem sit rerum ipsum corrupti quia. Eveniet dignissimos voluptatem nesciunt dolores voluptatem pariatur rerum. Sed qui assumenda exercitationem in rerum rerum qui.

Et veritatis quia error perspiciatis inventore ut quasi. Iusto hic ullam provident. Sit ea sunt sed sapiente ut. Dolorum quos ullam et. Id sint velit eius ut et iusto.

Magni at tempora at vel occaecati eos asperiores. Fuga similique et rem doloribus.

Alias dignissimos modi quam pariatur quia quas corporis necessitatibus. Officiis ea enim quo odit distinctio iste eveniet itaque.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (48) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”