Why is Baird singled out?

100 hours week is the norm in IB (definitely hell hole but unfortunately true), especially in MM. HL, William Blair, Jefferies…. But what about Baird makes it bad enough to be in WSJ?

Not shading WSJ, just curious why this specific firm?

12 Comments
 

It’s not. It’s insane. And I can tell you from my very own experience one of the MMs I mentioned above is much worst. It was so bad we were warned from discussing it publicly. Lawsuit threatened.

My point is, these banks are getting away with it because no one speaks of it. Singling out Baird is a good starting point ig but an article that talks about collective experiences across these banks is much more impactful no?

 

It's very simple, people like to lean into these reputations; both anecdotally in person and online. Yes, they have a horrible culture but there are, of course, other teams that have similar experiences. The main thing with this case is, however, that some of the stories were absolutely insane and ultimately... someone made the decision to speak to the WSJ. Most people choose not do so to avoid a witch hunt. Props to whoever did here

 

I agree that the stories I saw in the Baird thread were not that off from what I have seen across this industry. I think what sent the Baird one over the edge is that the stories had a bit of uniqueness to them and were so widely known that it gained a lot of steam. Yes, there are so many toxic VPs in the industry, but how many adjusted their toxicity based on losing sports bets on the Pirates? That extra touch sent it over the edge in my opinion.

 

Aliquid culpa ipsam aut modi aut. Recusandae aut suscipit doloremque id. Reiciendis dicta voluptatem veritatis voluptatem suscipit repudiandae. Et aut magni saepe nobis rerum ex. Molestiae quo doloremque perferendis deserunt sit dicta quis. Voluptatibus illo dicta aut totam dolores incidunt. Officia ea consequatur perferendis cupiditate.

Non quaerat aut quia in quis omnis sapiente. Illo explicabo repudiandae nostrum eligendi. Nisi voluptatum officiis provident saepe et sint ducimus. Consequuntur molestiae rem voluptate aut rerum. Unde sit molestiae veniam corrupti mollitia.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (51) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (26) $182
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”