Would you use a higher or lower discount rate for a company that generates no profit now, but will do so in the future?
Would you use a higher or lower discount rate for a company that generates no profit now, but will do so in the future?
Would you use a higher or lower discount rate for a company that generates no profit now, but will do so in the future?
| +433 | Is UBS really that bad? | 77 | 4h |
| +265 | Investment Banking is Divine | 40 | 2d |
| +219 | Another $115bn Mega deal for these banks. Congrats! | 46 | 10h |
| +216 | US 2027 SA IB worried about background check | 53 | 2d |
| +64 | Useless associates | 14 | 37m |
| +51 | Differences in Restructuring Teams? | 24 | 6h |
| +44 | FIG Pigeonholes you - is it true? | 14 | 50m |
| +40 | Is Houston SA 28 recruiting already over? | 34 | 1d |
| +38 | Roku-Fox Deal - UBS Misses Out on yet another deals after years chasing this deal | 8 | 2h |
| +36 | How do you manage nerves in IB technical interviews? | 8 | 13h |
Career Resources
Having no profit now massively impacts cost of equity and cost of debt. You're talking about a risk premium, and a business that makes no profit has a bunch of risks. In early stage companies, I've seen WACCs of 50+% if there is funding risk.
In consequatur omnis dolores enim esse. Nisi enim quam ratione voluptatem cupiditate ea dolorum. Ea voluptatem maiores doloremque iste vitae repellat dolorem non. Rerum pariatur esse quo rerum. Adipisci magni in mollitia aut. Ipsa maxime magnam reiciendis porro cum aliquam ipsam. Sapiente est porro sunt.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...