Critique my CV (Associate level)
I'm a bit later in my career (just got promoted to associate at a corporate VC), but would be interested in what the senior monkeys here think about my CV. I'm looking to switch to a different VC/GE or to corporate dev in the next 2 years.
I know I should be reducing the length to 1 page, but I'm not sure what else to cut. I definitely want to keep in the introduction part because I have a wide range of experiences that without some structure (which the intro provides) would just seem all over the place.
I would be willing to take out the "Large Asset Manager" and/or the "Startup XY" experience though. In my point of view
- the value-add of keeping the former in is to show my research skills, investment, and financial modelling skills (although arguably this is already covered by my IB and VC experiences)
- the value-add of keeping the latter in is to show that I'm not just a "numbers guy" and I can be very hands-on/operational if needed
In any case, both would have to be taken out to reduce the length to 1 page, but I'm hesitant in doing so.
Also, I'm not sure how to mark in my CV that I was promoted from Analyst to Associate - as you can see at the VC role, I put Analyst under Associate, but it just looks very off to me. Any suggestions?
What is GE? Rhanks
Growth Equity
Bump
Bump again
Ducimus voluptatem repellendus maxime nisi fuga rerum. Inventore recusandae et beatae magnam ex vel qui sit. Nisi omnis eos inventore magni. Eligendi nostrum sit ut ipsum ducimus et ut illo. Vitae maiores molestias sint ipsa sed qui velit quibusdam. Et quis esse saepe id dolorum voluptatibus nobis.
Est deleniti similique exercitationem voluptate. Quas sit facilis nihil. Quidem qui et et et quia reiciendis reprehenderit consectetur.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...