Feel like I have learned nothing in banking…

Hi All — I am second year analyst in a top group at a BB. I am going to a very technical UMM / MF known for investing across the capital structure and hairy deals. However, I feel like my experience in banking has not prepared me for PE whatsoever… have other people in similar situations felt the same way? If so, are there any ways to prepare before I enter the buyside this summer? Or will all the learning happen on the job? Would really appreciate any advice / resources on how to best prepare. 

21 Comments
 

perhaps change title to something positive so people will want to click on the thread and help.

Ignore title, IB 2 headed to similarly technical shop this year. Would also appreciate materials, resources, recommendations on this; I did a search for similar conversations on WSO a month ago and was shocked I couldn't find anything on this as I imagine so many people go through this.

The one thing I can't stand is when someone says "you learn it on the job" - just illustrates they weren't forward thinking enough to ask the right questions. I was met with this in banking and subsequently found a boat load of materials that would have been extremely helpful for me early days. I now push them on all my interns/analysts. 

Thanks to anyone that has some suitable suggestions. 

 

Hi, could you please send me those materials?

Going to an eb in the summer

 

PE is really banking 2.0. You'll learn 90% of the job on the job. You don't need to worry yourself over whether or not banking "prepared you" enough because you got the job. That's what it was meant to prepare you for, the rest of it is just a box checking exercise to filter for competence. Frankly, most of us in PE constantly joke about how bullshit banking is (IMO the only exception I've consistently observed is the RX guys because they build such a specialized skillset from their exp), so if anything making fun of how little it actually prepared you for will probably be a common occurrence. Congrats on the gig.

"If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 

The only thing I got from this is that some RX knowledge is helpful in PE?

If anyone could rattle off a list of advanced things to look at in prep for PE ie that surpasses all the basic valuation and transaction processes. I think that’s what this thread is looking for.

Eg how commonly do you look at 13 week cash flows in PE, obv common in RX?

 

Lot of equity value bridges
More detailed and real ad hoc analyses tracing ANYTHING to equity value
Yes, focus on cash flow

If you are comfortable with understanding how any change in the business may impact equity value, what else is there from a technical conceptual perspective?

If you can be comfortable with modeling, very comfortable, that would be good as there is a lot of that.

 

Analyst 2 in IB-M&A

The only thing I got from this is that some RX knowledge is helpful in PE?

If anyone could rattle off a list of advanced things to look at in prep for PE ie that surpasses all the basic valuation and transaction processes. I think that’s what this thread is looking for.

Eg how commonly do you look at 13 week cash flows in PE, obv common in RX?

Not that RX is specifically valuable to PE (unless you're going into distressed obv) but that most people's banking exp isn't universally a difference-maker when interviewing given most folks these days are only like 6mos into the job when they're recruiting on-cycle. The only time people (in my exp) really laud their banking exp as having given them supremely useful skills they use on the job is when they came from RX, but that's because RX is very specialized vs if you were just at an M&A/coverage group sure you may have covered the same sector but the real "PE learning" will come from being OTJ. XLS/PPT skills are just table stakes and those technical skills are really the big takeaway from banking IMO, it doesn't get you to "think like an investor" just because you sat in a chair all night hammering away at an appendix none of us really read unless it's coming down to the wire in a very competitive bidding process. 

"If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 
Most Helpful

There’s a bit of a difference between trying to be prepared to perform well as an associate and trying to learn more about investing.

As with both being a banking analyst and a PE associate, there will be an obvious learning curve. You’ll start with fairly simple tasks and you’ll find your responsibility grows as people begin to trust you. My advice would be the same you may have heard as a new analyst; start by making sure you do the simple stuff right. Make sure your numbers are correct. Communicate well. Take good notes, and circulate key takeaways. No one expects you to offer compelling qualitative takes or pontificate on industry nuances at first, but they do expect you to have answers to simple financial / data-related questions.

When I finished banking, I had essentially zero investor acumen. This obviously comes gradually as you learn on the job, but I think I would’ve have been better served by doing the following sooner.

1) Think critically about the work you’re doing now. It’s easy to go on autopilot, but try to ask questions and understand why you’re doing the analysis you’re doing.
2) Pick a basket of companies to follow in a similar industry. Whether it’s consumer, hospitals, autos, or anything relevant to the fund you’ll be joining. Just follow earnings, read the transcripts, and try to understand the key drivers of each business. Have takes on which do certain things better and why.
3) Related to the above, I think finding a Tegus login and reading expert call transcripts on companies or industries that interest you is a helpful tool. Diving further into a specific industry is a great way to learn. Read a few books
4) Good to learn how to think about value. I think Valuation by McKinsey is a good resource. What are the keys drivers of a company? Also just thinking more about capital structures is a helpful exercice. What is interplay between UFCF yield and cost of debt?

 

This is a super helpful comment, thanks. Just wondering if you could explain how to think about the “relationship between UFCF yield and cost of debt” you mentioned at the end?

 

I personally had the basics from banking, ie basics accounting and rudimentary modeling and business evaluation frameworks.

The vast majority of how I showed up prepared was by being a somewhat obsessed finance nerd and interview prep. So reading the Tuck white paper on PE and LBOs for fun, way back when. Building LBO models for deals I had nothing to do with and then doing all sorts of sides analyses to understand the moving pieces. And then nuts and bolts interview prep, figuring out how to talk about my deals, being super sharp on lbo math, having a bunch of mental models I could use to evaluate a business/investment on a verbal case, etc.

 

Nihil quibusdam commodi rerum sapiente distinctio fugit et molestiae. Consequatur omnis molestias et rerum ut qui. Quibusdam maxime quibusdam quia commodi laboriosam.

Molestiae velit voluptates atque delectus voluptatem. Perferendis magni quidem suscipit nihil asperiores qui aperiam reiciendis. Qui sequi adipisci mollitia sunt laborum quaerat est. Voluptate vero et pariatur dicta cumque aut reprehenderit. Quasi vel non quas est aspernatur harum vel odio.

Dolore optio natus sint. Veritatis et quia voluptatibus ut rerum eos. Quas vel mollitia est nemo cupiditate dolorum cumque omnis. Voluptatem voluptatem et dolorem optio eos architecto sed. Illum numquam rerum earum.

Ut eos nemo quis fugiat quas molestiae numquam. Iure porro perferendis totam similique labore laboriosam explicabo. Iste et nobis hic alias perferendis. Enim consequatur qui ut architecto. Aut vel voluptas et in eius. Nam id placeat et minima ipsa nemo et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.2%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Ardian 98.9%
  • Blackstone Group 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (97) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (234) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (95) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (271) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (37) $80
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (352) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”