I don't like roll ups / heavy M&A deals
Not sure if I am the minority in this forum by stating this, but I've never been a fan of roll up strategies. They can work really well in certain sectors, like dental clinics and car washes but I've often found there to be significant execution risk. Same goes for deals really heavy on M&A...just not my cup of tea.
Lately I am really into growth equity stage companies - just starting to generate EBITDA but revenue growing 50%+ YoY with no debt. Organic growth is the focus.
A very small minority of PE deals are ever purely organic. The math just doesn’t work to avoid inorganic growth altogether. The growth equity space is dominated by buy&build strategies or “roll ups”.
Not sure I agree with that. Look at a firm like Insight, TA Associates, or General Atlantic. They're not doing a ton of M&A.
TA does a boatload of add ons
TA has done several messy, slap-it-together roll-up’s.
This simply isn't the case. I see it about 20% of the time as the strategy, but it's certainly not "dominated" by these strategies.
The math doesn’t look good at SOFR + 700
That's actually cheap for this market. I am seeing lower mid market senior credit for m&a deals trade at A+13-14
In consumer, there are a lot of very bad LMM + MM size platforms floating around. IMO these will tank valuation wise as they can't get big enough to IPO, and aren't strategically interesting.
It’s all about multiple arbitrage and reducing your effective cost basis.
True but also a ton of execution risk if you don't know how to integrate businesses.
Does anyone know if any firms that focus more purely on organic growth? My sense is the earlier stage stuff / VC
Not much execution risk from integrating mom and pop shops.
Also ‘integration’ can be a very loose term. Many buy-and-build plays run with decentralised operating models which means very little work needs to be done to add new bolt-ons to a platform.
My dude, totally agreed, organic growth stories are the absolute tits. But let's be real, who among us doesn't get at least a solid half chub to the thought of rolling up half a dozen $3m-5m small cos on your $30m+ rev platform at 2-5x and selling the whole kit and caboodle at 7x-10x+? Organic growth is the true ruler of valuation no question (sans synergistic silliness) but M&A done right is so capital efficient it's frankly a disservice to your LPs (and yourself, just think about carry) if you don't keep yourself open to leveraging it wherever it makes strategic sense.
We've got a portco bought for <$50m, added another $20m-30m in add-ons + organic growth and now we're fielding inbounds in the half a B+ range 5-6 yrs from initial investment. Sure, organic growth for the original product would've been great and all, but adding several other offerings that had accelerated trajectories in their own segments and natural opportunities for cross-selling is what turned it into a home run. Sometimes it's truly just easier to let someone else do the work and buy it afterward.
No risk, no reward my guy. All about the type of risk you want to take. What is in your (or rather your fund's) DNA, and what type of risk can you create a value creation strategy around? If you want an organic growth story, you are taking on risk around sales execution, industry / macro, and purchase multiple. If you are taking on an M&A roll-up, you are taking on risk around acquisition integration, M&A actionability, and oftentimes management / people. The diligence and value creation playbook for each of these looks different, so in many cases the same investor or even firm does not excel at both of these. I spend a lot of time with roll-ups in the IT space, and we have developed a good playbook around integrating acquisitions, building platforms to plug in mom and pop acquisitions, and are willing to get our hands dirty on diligence for a smaller acquisition. It's a sustainable value creation strategy for us, and we are very comfortable with the risk profile that carries.
Et veniam quo quae sit. Eveniet ut vel soluta vero. Eius impedit quo itaque perferendis veritatis aliquid. Fuga quia mollitia at expedita dicta quibusdam.
Qui unde et sunt modi et et. Quia corporis omnis sit optio. Recusandae aut quaerat nihil nobis repudiandae. Quis nihil voluptatem repellendus perferendis magni. Consequatur eos ipsam itaque consequatur veniam atque corporis.
Ut alias cumque tempore velit similique. Consequatur quia quaerat error ut facere dolorum excepturi. Explicabo assumenda et voluptatum fugit aliquam quo esse. Quis qui aliquam alias qui qui sed aut.
Nostrum veniam pariatur accusantium suscipit sed vero. Quas aperiam tempora deleniti maiores est numquam nam. Nihil perferendis dolorem ut ipsum sit. Dolores sint assumenda dolorem consequatur.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...