Up and Coming Funds

What are some funds that are fairly new (semi-recent first or recent second fund) with reputable partners and clear room to grow? For example, Nonantum Capital in Boston is a bunch of former Charlesbank and raised a ~$450MM first fund. 

103 Comments
 

All of these funds are spinouts from good platforms that spun out without fully intact teams.  Faster advancement with assumed good deal sourcing. 

While some (Cornell Capital) are pretty institutionalized since they have been around 7 years, most you would have the ability to grow with the firm, to make it to the next step rather than being pushed out after your two year associate stint.  

You want to be on the ground floor of say the next Clearlake, because you are then the mid-late 30s partner who has 4-6% of the total carry pool of say a 10b fund. (2x return payout is 80m - 120m).   You aren't really getting those shots on goal at institutionalized platforms.  

 

Interesting - BGH is already the biggest buyout fund in Australia. Founders are Robin Bishop (was next in line CEO of Macquarie but left prior to Shemara taking the role), Ben Gray (ex co-head of Asia for TPG), and Simon Harle (ex TPG).

 

Gamut is definitely interesting. Ex-APO senior guys who are employing similar strategy to lower/middle-market situations. Recently expanded office size too from what I heard from someone there at end 2019/beginning 2020 to accommodate increased headcount. 

Also 1bn premier fund (2017 I believe) which they've had a lot of traction in deploying in last two years. Seems like they had a slower start but are offsetting that

 

On the MM/LMM tech side:

  • Resurgens Technology Partners in Atlanta, first fund $212mm and GPs are former AKKR guys from the Atlanta office
  • Avenue Growth Partners in DC, GPs are former Bain Capital Ventures & JMI Equity but haven't seen anything on fund size
  • Banneker Partners in Portland/SF, first fund ~$250mm and GPs from Vista Equity (incl. former cofounder)
"If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 

Diversis fund is performing well and they have some ex-Gores at the helm

 
Most Helpful

The firm mentioned in the very first comment is Recognize. In addition to David Wasserman, the guy you mentioned from CD&R, the other two are Frank D’ Souza (co-founded Cognizant) and Josh Miller (co-founded Atomic, the incubator that now has a fund attached and launched companies like Hims/Hers).

Agree with several other mentions.

Stellex is deep value, operationally-intensive turnaround stuff. Distressed-for-control is not for the faint of heart. Ray is one of the few senior Black people in this business and you love to see how well he's grown the firm. They raised $870m in a one-and-done close on a $750m target for Fund I, and a touch over three years later raised Fund II at $1.775b on $1.25b target.

Arcline, Gamut, and Cove Hill are all similar to each other. (a) Small core founding team, usually around a primary personality, (b) background at a large, well-respected platform, (c) significant critical mass in their first fund, (d) attractive pace of deployment to date. 

Another one not mentioned is Brightstar. Andrew has a really cool thing with his operational role during his time at Lindsay Goldberg. 

"Associate 3" hit the nail on the head with his 1:22 comment. If you can get into one of these places during their first or second fund, you have decent odds at getting a favorable carry position and long-term seat in a firm that raises successive billion/multibillion-dollar funds.

I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.
 

Thanks for the insightful post as always. 

In another thread on Greycroft, you mentioned the importance of investing as an apprenticeship, specifically "how to evaluate markets, businesses, and the teams that run them". Was curious if you could provide some more detail or an example of a "good" evaluation vs. an average or generic one, especially in the case of folks who run distress for control strategies.

If you were an analyst currently recruiting, how would you judge this ability from the outside looking in? 

 

I would look at the clients of any top tier PE placement agent or Private Funds Group. They only take on clients who can raise relatively quickly/painlessly, meaning high quality groups that are usually spin-offs with accomplished management teams that are looking to scale to the next level. Ability to raise successive scalable funds is another large criteria for who they take on, meaning that their clients (aka PE managers) are growing in fund size and likely expanding both their investment teams and supporting cast

 

The pfg's at banks such as UBS, Credit Suisse, etc tend to focus on the huge multi-b funds, but groups at Lazard, Moelis are probably more in the category I'm talking about. And then of course the good boutique players like Eaton, MVision, Campell Luytens, Park Hill (since bought out by PJT), etc are all solid groups and probably your best bet for finding these kind of funds as their service is a little more bespoke than pure distribution

If you want to dig just google the top PE placement agent lists and then check the clients they announce on their website/linkedin. You can probably find funds they're currently working on (unannounced) by checking linkedin likes and things like that

 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 

Am familiar with Equality, Managing Partner is an absolute beast.

"If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 

Some have been mentioned already, but what comes to mind for me:

BayPine (Boston-based, founded by a co-founder of Silver Lake and a Blackstone exec, focused on digitalization and already doing very big deals)

Brightstar (NY-based but offices all over, founded by the exec who built up Lindsay Goldberg, seem very operationally focused. rapidly growing and heard they have crazy returns so far)

Crosspoint (SF-based, cybersecurity experts with significant operating experience and just brought a senior Bain Cap exec over)

Gamut (NY-based, ex-Apollo and KPS people using the same playbook, so I expect them to do well)

 

Already mentioned on this post - CoveHill and Arcline are your best bets. Cove Hill is a Bain spin out with a great team and track record. Arcline is a golden gate spin out with arguably the best track record in middle market private equity. Raised the largest fund 1 for a new fund in a decade and then raised a second 2.75B fund a year and a half later (likely after investing most of fund I). Their portfolio is incredible and they underwrite macro trends before anyone else sees them so have a reputation of paying up for businesses that others discount. We run into them a lot in pretty competitive auction processes, but they convert deals better than most other shops that are 10x larger/older. Think they have an analyst program if I’m remembering correctly. Not sure if Cove Hill still has one, but they used to when just getting started. 
 

Would also add that both are recruiting some of the best junior/mid-level investors I’ve seen in PE. CoveHill’s team has an ex-Bain consulting leaning and all coming from Bains private equity diligence group - solid group in consulting. Arcline’s associates (“underwriting associate” is what they call it, but this is your typical deal-team associate) probably some of the best junior level folks in PE today. Don’t know of Cove Hills recruitment process, but Arcline’s is pretty intense (which probably explains the talent level). Have banking friends that are running sellsides that talk about Arcline’s junior investment team (associates/Senior associates) leading diligence calls with management and that they supposedly ask questions like they’ve spent 20 years in the industry/sector instead of 1 or 2. I get the sense Arcline recruits for very operationally-intense folks with a lot of sector specific knowledge, but they play in a lot of sectors (life science, aero and defense, cap equipment, med device, etc.) so not really sure how they do it. 
 

Would be curious to hear how others think of newer funds’ junior teams. Looking at the junior team of the funds you’re interested in and their career trajectory is probably the best way to get a sense of your potential paths, but still imperfect. I’d try the cold email approach and reach out to associates at these various funds to get in the door - newer/smaller shops are much more likely to respond (speaking from experience at a sub-1B    industrials focused shop)

 

This is a quality post, but wondering how you gauge the quality of the junior team for these funds if they haven't been around long enough yet to see exits / career trajectory. It looks to me like the junior team isn't anything majorly impressive (coming from MBB or mid-tier IBs for the most part), so although you have some interesting anecdotes, wondering if that reputation carries across the industry.

 

Can anyone comment on if opportunities at new PE funds are attractive at an pre-MBA associate level, or if this is really a good opportunity for current PE associates looking for a faster track to VP and carry. For context, I’m coming from a target / solid BB background and am looking at a new ~$500mm fund, and the pay is lower than both other MM PE funds I could recruit for and being an IB associate, but am considering the idea of having earlier access to carry and building something from the ground up. Is this really a unique opportunity, or am I just selling myself short since the upside is many years later and as an associate I might not even make it long enough to seeing the upside, while also closing the doors of having a brand name on my resume for more optionality?

 

I’m at a newer firm (on Fund II) myself. You can def get promoted faster and take on more responsibility than you would otherwise since they’re basically making up their processes, etc as they go along. Note that this kind of unstructured environment is NOT for everyone (esp since most finance people tend to be a pretty risk-averse crowd), but you can make a much bigger impact than you would just processing CIMs at a more established fund. 
 

On exits, it’s materially tougher if you’re trying to stay in the industry or lateral to a more established fund. Recruiters in particular have a “you don’t get fired for hiring IBM” mindset and will have a bias toward the guy from KKR, etc every time. That said if you’re the type who does well at a new firm, you’re also the type who can hustle. 
 

If you’re trying to leave the industry it doesn’t really matter where you work since most FP&A, tech, etc people don’t have a clue about the relative “prestige” of firms 

 

Est aut amet sint molestias dolor laudantium error dolore. Voluptas dolorum ut enim aut. Voluptatem sunt ullam aut est voluptate dolor perspiciatis.

Est omnis voluptatum assumenda repellat magnam fugiat rerum sunt. Aut facere dignissimos voluptatum quis. Voluptatibus consequatur porro sequi dolorem dolor officia. Porro aliquam nam doloribus et maxime sit soluta. Earum sed nobis accusamus at officiis.

 

Adipisci omnis id enim reprehenderit possimus aliquid laborum et. Recusandae quam ipsum porro aut molestias adipisci similique. Architecto enim autem harum nisi. Veritatis minima ut aut soluta modi modi. Ut dolorum voluptas ea illo neque reiciendis.

Voluptas id sunt neque eum et. Expedita nihil minima modi.

Et et sit dolores placeat dolore molestiae molestiae. Officiis quia ut consectetur molestiae ipsa.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Ardian 98.9%
  • Blackstone Group 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (97) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (234) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (95) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (271) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (37) $80
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (351) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”