Debt Asset Management Question

Hey Guys

I have a quick question regarding debt asset management best practices.

Suppose you have a €64.4m loan originated at 2.25% + reference rate (SOFR/SONIA/EURIBOR), with a cap strike at 1.75%, and the reference rate currently at 2.82%.

If the cap is in the money, when modelling ICR should this be done net of hedging proceeds or gross? In other words, should interest be modelled using the all-in rate of 5.07% or 4% for the purposes of calculating ICR or DSCR?

In this example:
• Modelling ICR on gross interest gives ~1.43x
• Modelling ICR on net interest gives ~1.81x

I’d be very interested in perspectives from both a European and a US standpoint.

Thanks in advance!

Edit: Thanks guys this makes sense and I agree with the logic. I tend to show both as the net shows the financial burden on the sponsor whereas, showing the gross impact if for one reason or another the sponsor cannot afford to purchase a cap at expiry.

4 Comments
 

When modeling ICR (Interest Coverage Ratio) in the context of a loan with a cap in the money, the approach depends on the specific purpose of the analysis and the perspective of the stakeholders involved. Here's a breakdown based on insights from WSO discussions:

  1. Gross Interest Approach (All-in Rate of 5.07%):

    • This method uses the total interest cost without accounting for hedging proceeds.
    • It provides a more conservative view of the borrower's ability to cover interest payments, which might be preferred by lenders or underwriters focused on stress-testing scenarios.
    • Gross interest modeling aligns with a "worst-case" perspective, ensuring that the borrower can meet obligations even without the benefit of the cap.
  2. Net Interest Approach (Adjusted Rate of 4%):

    • This method accounts for the hedging proceeds, effectively reducing the interest cost to reflect the cap's impact.
    • It offers a more accurate representation of the borrower's actual cash flow obligations, which might be more relevant for internal asset management or performance tracking.
    • Net interest modeling is often used when the cap is actively mitigating interest rate risk, as it reflects the real financial burden on the borrower.

European vs. US Perspective:

  • European Perspective: European lenders and asset managers might lean towards the net interest approach, especially if the cap is a standard part of the loan structure and actively offsets rate increases. This approach aligns with the focus on actual cash flow management.
  • US Perspective: US lenders, particularly those in more conservative institutions, might prefer the gross interest approach for underwriting and risk assessment. However, for ongoing asset management, the net interest approach could be more practical.

Recommendation:

  • For ICR modeling, the choice between gross and net interest depends on the context:
    • Use gross interest for underwriting, stress testing, or when presenting to external stakeholders who prioritize conservative metrics.
    • Use net interest for internal asset management, performance tracking, or when the focus is on actual cash flow obligations.

In your example: - Gross Interest (5.07%): ICR = ~1.43x - Net Interest (4%): ICR = ~1.81x

Both calculations are valid, but the choice should align with the purpose of the analysis and the audience's expectations.

Sources: Looking for Multifamily model with Loan Sizing Constraints, Multi-Family Acquisitions Excel Test, Great Deals You've Recently Done, So you want to work in CRE Debt? Here are the options..., Loan Terms

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

ICR will be calculated as the spread + min(strike strate, applicable base rate) so 4% base rate in this case

Two things to flag here: As a Lender, you will still receive the full base rate as your Borrower will pay up to the strike of the cap and the hedge counterparty will pay for the amount above the strike cap

Also, if hedging in the money can artificially boost your ICR, looking at interest cover on the actual base rate could enable you to have a better view on potential refi risk as your borrower might not be able to pay interest at hedge expiry

 

Illum unde quisquam eum cupiditate vel. Aliquam voluptatem eos magnam eaque corrupti provident esse atque. Nesciunt vel voluptatum debitis magni dolores quisquam quos. Sit quod saepe voluptatem maiores.

Minima adipisci et debitis aut eos necessitatibus reiciendis quia. Ipsum sequi nam repudiandae. Nihil deleniti fugit quia sint. Aliquam quo eveniet porro alias.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan No 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”