NOI vs EBITDA
Can someone explain to me once and for all, what are the differences between NOI and EBITDA? I got MANY DIFFERENT definitions from different sources.
NOI includes some capitalised items that normally arent included in ebitda? Is that it? Why use NOI instead of ebitda? Is NOI just a metric between ebitda and FCF?
Ah, the age-old debate of NOI vs. EBITDA! Let's break it down in a way that even a monkey could understand (no offense to my fellow primates).
Net Operating Income (NOI) and Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) are both critical metrics, but they serve different purposes and are used in different contexts, especially when you're swinging from the trees of real estate and corporate finance.
Net Operating Income (NOI):
Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA):
Differences:
Why Use NOI Instead of EBITDA in Real Estate?
NOI is preferred in real estate because it provides a purer measure of the operational efficiency of property management, excluding the effects of financing and capital structure. It's tailored to the unique aspects of real estate operations, making it more relevant for property investors.
In essence, while EBITDA gives a broad view of a company's operational health across industries, NOI zooms in on the profitability of real estate investments, excluding non-operational factors. Each metric has its vine to swing on, depending on the jungle you're navigating!
So, while NOI might seem like a metric between EBITDA and FCF in a broad sense, it's more about its specific application in real estate, focusing on operational income without the influence of financing or capital expenditures.
Sources: EBITDA vs. Operating Cash Flow vs. Free Cash Flow, EBITDA vs. Operating Cash Flow vs. Free Cash Flow, 21 Finance Interview Questions and Answers, Real Estate Private Equity Technical Qs, Sources and Uses: How to Find and Use Information in IBD (EBITDA example)
To my mind, NOI includes real estate taxes (or rather, taxes are counted as expenses and thus netted out of the final NOI number) and EBITDA doesn't.
More broadly, EBITDA is a bullshit term invented by non-real estate companies who want to be able to take on dangerous amounts of debt but still tell their investors that the world is sunny and fine. It's part and parcel of the same shitty attitude towards business operations that has infected American publicly traded firms for the last half century.
You are thinking about financial metrics used to measure different types of investments. Think of NOI as a quick and easy Cash Flow of a property. (I know NOI does not equal Cash Flow just assume it means cash flow for the example). EBITDA is going to be your quick and easy Cash Flow for a legal vehicle/entity that may hold real estate. As another user mentioned, NOI is more of a real estate specific metric. It is a real estate ASSET/PROPERTY specific metric while EBITDA is more of a corporate finance metric.
To be clear, if you are looking at the acquisition of a stand alone property, you will not see EBITDA, you will see line items off a T-12 all the way down to NOI. If you are looking at the acquisition of a PORTFOLIO of multiple properties that are held within a single legal vehicle, you will see a T-12 all the way down to NOI on an individual property basis + combined basis for each property, but you will also see an EBTIDA line item when you view the PORTFOLIO/FUND financials, not the PROPERTY financials.
This is a much more elegant response than mine, and good way to see it on property level vs. "corporate" level
Thanks.
So let’s say for a hotel,
Its NOI is property level cash flow, pre tax, pre interest expense, and pre any types of capital expenditure? What if these tax / interest expense / capex is property related? Ie property tax on the property instead of income tax on a corporate level, interest expense on acquisition loan for this hotel instead of interest expense on corporate debt, and capex for this hotel property renovation.
To be specific, so going back to this hotel example, NOI equals room revenue + food & beverage revenue - related operating expenses (utility, labor, cleaning etc), and - undistributed expenses like sg&a expense on a hotel level? How about depreciation resulted from capital expenditure on say renovation on the hotels? Do we add back asset level depreciation to get NOI?
To me, I think NOI is just cash flow on property level, pre tax pre interest expense pre capex, (ie ebitda on property level), therefore we have to add back “non-cash expenses” to get NOI (like D&A).
To keep it simple, for hotels where NOI is not specified as a line item --> NOI = EBITDA. That's the simple way, confirmed it with VPs I know. May not be exact but if you're looking at hotel cash flows that is what it is.
Best way to think about NOI in corporate equivalent terms is cash flow from operations. Most of RE modeling is done on a cash basis (especially on the asset level) and EBITDA is a quasi-GAAP measure (isn't recognized under GAAP, but is built on GAAP earnings) used by investors to estimate unlevered free cash flow (EBITDA - Capex), so it isn't the best comparison to use.
Cash flow from operations would be a more apt (albeit imperfect) comparison, since NOI factors in your property's rental revenue and operating expenses, but traditionally does not include capital expenditures (capital improvements, leasing commissions, tenant allowances etc.).
NOI minus capital items is cash flow before debt service (i.e. unlevered free cash flow).
NOI includes property taxes / realty taxes but it doesn't include income taxes (similar to EBITDA).
It's the same metric in my mind. NOI is used generally in a real estate context, EBITDA in an operating business context.
Great responses on the thread so far.
NOI is a property-level metric, whereas EBITDA is corporate-level.
Think of NOI as an OpCo Gross Margin. Property taxes is “technically” like a CoGs.
To get to EBITDA from NOI, is layering on corporate-level items; most general formula is:
NOI - Corporate G&A = EBITDA.
I sometimes add in corporate “other income”.
Hope this helps.
They’re the same thing, just one is used in real estate and the other is used in corporate finance. Companies are valued with EV/EBITDA multiples, and real estate is valued the same way, just the fraction is inverted and called a “cap rate”
Incidunt odio veniam consectetur nemo odio eligendi minus aliquam. Quis quisquam non natus accusamus ducimus ut. Exercitationem ratione quis sapiente. Accusamus neque non vel voluptas totam sed. Est qui exercitationem ut molestias pariatur magni.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...