Assault my CV and leave to return from dead v2

Taking a quick look:

• Spell utilized correctly

• AI not Ai

• Spell out numbers under 10

• Potential acquisition candidates is repetitive

• Be consistent with how you refer to things billions/bn

• You need to reword a lot of your bullets there is no flow to them

• Also some of your bullets just don't seem believable. I for one doubt you helped a VP come up with an investment thesis for an entire fund. GPs formulate fund wide strategies, not interns (I'd call bull in an interview)

Are you looking to apply to IBD? If so remove Trading society. Also scrap certifications and add languages that you speak.

I wouldn’t say 5bn under assets. I would either say 5bn assets or 5bn AUM.

There are some typos - ie its either during A roadshow or during roadshows. But during roadshow makes no sense. In the same sentence you are also missing 2 ‘the’. Already fix that all over your CV and lets see what it looks like.

In the future better anonymize your unis. Can tell which ones you went to by the groupings. Especially obvious with the MSc.

What was your gmat btw?

• Remove predicted honours under the MSc, not really necessary as won't have started the degree at the time of application
• I think some HR tick boxers will expect to see your IB Diploma subjects
• Past tense for the newsletter entry (even though its ongoing)
• Under the newsletter the dash on the first entry is the wrong size
• I wouldn't bother with the certifications, as they don't really add anything, and you don't really want an interviewer asking you "what does xx do in excel?"
• Agree with the points other commenters have made

Also not sure why some people on this website are obsessed with trying to find the person who has posted their resume, rather than giving them constructive feedback? Regardless, all undergrad/postgrad groupings are broadly regarded in the same light

I concur with all of the advice you received above. I would suggest replacing your "Extra-Curricular & Leadership" header with simply "Leadership". Writing "Predicted Honors: Pending" seems odd and doesn't add significant value in my opinion (though this may be the convention across Europe and if so leave it). I would also recommend expanding on your mentorship role as it currently is only one line in length and throws off the balance of the page, especially with other engagements being at least two in length and your roles being placed adjacent to the company names rather than below (understand you likely did this to save space).