CFA® in 2 weeks

Hey chimps,

Just thought I'd post this on here to dispel some myths about the CFA® [sic]. Not bragging, just want to establish that it's not in fact as difficult as people make it sound. I agree there is a lot of content, but the point I want to make is if you're efficient, you can get a helluva lot done in very little time.

This was the study plan (between school/job at this point):

WEEK 1:
- Read one book of Kaplan each day (~14 hrs pd)

WEEK 2:
- Do 2 past papers each day (~8-12 hrs pd)

GENERAL DAY:
7-12 - study
12-1230 - lunch
1230-430 - study
430-7 - exercise/dinner/relax (obvs no tv/computer)
7-Midnight - study

Was this difficult? Yes.
Was it draining/demoralising? Yes. (no worse than IBD)
Was it worth it? No question. Some of my mates spent about 6 months declining invitations to party/go out due to CFA® commitments.

Anyway results were out today and passed lvl 1 with most topics in the >70% cat.

NUMBER ONE TIP: Turn off phone and computer when studying. Your pals can chill. So can Gaybook.

39 Comments
 

agreed that it isn't all that bad as some stories i hear studying for months, but it depends what your background is I think

the other point about the CFA is that I really don't agree with a lot of its content about portfolio theory, EMH, etc.

 
MittRomneyagreed that it isn't all that bad as some stories i hear studying for months, but it depends what your background is I think

the other point about the CFA is that I really don't agree with a lot of its content about portfolio theory, EMH, etc.

Well now that I know you don't agree with the CFA, I will never take it!!! What is it about portfolio theory and EMH that you don't agree with? Obviously, you're much smarter than the people from the CFA.

 
ineedajob15
MittRomneyagreed that it isn't all that bad as some stories i hear studying for months, but it depends what your background is I think

the other point about the CFA is that I really don't agree with a lot of its content about portfolio theory, EMH, etc.

Well now that I know you don't agree with the CFA, I will never take it!!! What is it about portfolio theory and EMH that you don't agree with? Obviously, you're much smarter than the people from the CFA.

read the book value investing by james montier and he makes some pretty good arguments...very broadly speaking, i disagree that markets are efficient and that the price accurately represents the value of the security...i.e. active management can work

 

CFA lv 1 in 2 weeks is doable (especially if you come from a finance undergrad background or just finished a training class in IB or S&T which helps cover the accounting, valuations and some of the Fixed Income materials)

CFA lv 2 in 2 weeks - would be hell, but still doable assuming you don't have a job and can study day in day out

CFA lv 3 in 2 weeks - not so doable. It's less material than CFA lv 2, but practicing for the written exam requires some time. It's harder in a different sense because there's a lot more application than lv 2 where all the info is given to you and things are all formulaic.

 
KanonCFA lv 1 in 2 weeks is doable (especially if you come from a finance undergrad background or just finished a training class in IB or S&T which helps cover the accounting, valuations and some of the Fixed Income materials)

CFA lv 2 in 2 weeks - would be hell, but still doable assuming you don't have a job and can study day in day out

CFA lv 3 in 2 weeks - not so doable. It's less material than CFA lv 2, but practicing for the written exam requires some time. It's harder in a different sense because there's a lot more application than lv 2 where all the info is given to you and things are all formulaic.

Thanks for the info. Yeah fully intend on spreading the study over a longer period for lvl 2/3, but was a fun challenge. Glad to hear some other ppl managed in even shorter timeframe/hours - impressed!

For the record, yes I have UG econ and exp at a BB.

Moving tonnes of product. Making fat stacks.
 

Thats great, but for most people that have jobs, it would be impossible to study like that for 2 weeks, so thats why its spread out for 4-6 months.

 

JW how you did 14 hr a day studying with school and a job. dont seem to actually be enough hours in the day

I say fuck change, I don't chase dimes
 

On top of the fact that most people don't have two open weeks to dedicate to study, this sounds like an awful two weeks and I'm sure retention of the material after the test would not be very good.

Take a few months, learn the material well, and you'll be much more confident going in and will retain much more of what you learned to build on for level 2.

 
YellowRangerWhy Kaplan material vs CFA material?

It's more condensed and really doesn't leave anything out. It's about maximizing your efficiency.

Most people studying for CFA don't have two weeks without any commitments so this whole "plan" is pretty much impossible for most.

"For I am a sinner in the hands of an angry God. Bloody Mary full of vodka, blessed are you among cocktails. Pray for me now and at the hour of my death, which I hope is soon. Amen."
 

Yah these two week CFA study threads never cease to amaze me. The 3-day Level I study topic was a real hoot. I just started studying for Level II and I fully intend on putting in 225+ hours spaced out over the next 4 months.

My name is Nicky, but you can call me Dre.
 

I practically flunked out of college as a fiinance major and past L1 3 weeks after graduation. I put in about 250 hours of study between December and May. So I studied somewhere around 12 hours per week, which seemed like a full-time job for a lazy college student.

Array
 
Virginia Tech 4everI practically flunked out of college as a fiinance major and past L1 3 weeks after graduation. I put in about 250 hours of study between December and May. So I studied somewhere around 12 hours per week, which seemed like a full-time job for a lazy college student.
12 hours per week is about what I did for Level I while working full-time. It's a time sink and your personal life suffers a bit but it's more then doable.
My name is Nicky, but you can call me Dre.
 

I think outperformance in a large-cap fund is going to be extremely hard to come by. There was an interesting study that showed the companies that had the most "Buy" analyst recommendations in the S&P 500 outperformed the companies with the most "Sell" ratings.

Now, small cap and micro caps are an entirely different story and that is where I believe it is possible to (severely) outperform the market.

My name is Nicky, but you can call me Dre.
 
aempireiI think outperformance in a large-cap fund is going to be extremely hard to come by. There was an interesting study that showed the companies that had the most "Buy" analyst recommendations in the S&P 500 outperformed the companies with the most "Sell" ratings.

Now, small cap and micro caps are an entirely different story and that is where I believe it is possible to (severely) outperform the market.

This is exactly right about large vs. small caps.

 

Sorry Rav, I meant to say the companies with the most "Sell" ratings outperformed those with "Buy," but I think you got my point. I've gotta PM you back soon to ask for some advice on career path again.

My name is Nicky, but you can call me Dre.
 

Uhh, Warren Buffet has access to far more information and leverage than the average investor. Unless you can buy a controlling stake in the company and cut fat and change management, you aren\'t doing it the Buffet way. In addition, the guy is the quintessential corporatist/crony capitalist/insider, especially as he\'s gotten wealthier and more powerful. The guy pretty much has direct access to the Obama administration.

Array
 

It is what you said. You wrote a sarcastic and flagrantly off base rebuttal to eriginal\'s point. Your claim was that WB trades on inside information, some of which is gained through his ties to Obama. That\'s a joke. And your claim that the only way to \"do it the Buffett way\" is by owning full stakes in corporations is equally wrong (and wasn\'t even worth responding to). He didn\'t start doing that in scale until decades into his career.

Look, some people are really good at investing. No need to try to slander them, especially without any evidence or viable claims.

If you have something valuable to contribute, please do so, otherwise don\'t clutter up the forum with garbage accusations.

 
RavenousIt is what you said. You wrote a sarcastic and flagrantly off base rebuttal to eriginal\'s point. Your claim was that WB trades on inside information, some of which is gained through his ties to Obama. That\'s a joke. And your claim that the only way to \"do it the Buffett way\" is by owning full stakes in corporations is equally wrong (and wasn\'t even worth responding to). He didn\'t start doing that in scale until decades into his career.

Look, some people are really good at investing. No need to try to slander them, especially without any evidence or viable claims.

If you have something valuable to contribute, please do so, otherwise don\'t clutter up the forum with garbage accusations.

Couldn't have said it better myself.

You could definitely argue that in the past 10-20 years he has had more leverage than the average investor, but before that active portfolio management was really the only key to his success. He picked great companies that were undervalued.

 

How is it garbage accusations? Comparing Buffet to an everyday investor is like comparing a real estate developer to a REIT's performance. It's completely apples and oranges, not to mention that when Buffet was investing in a regular portfolio as a nobody it was done years before computers. Computers have made the market far, far more efficient than it was in the 1960s. Your points are completely and utterly invalid. Buffet buys companies and changes their management and uses incredible economies of scale and leverage. He also has incredible insider ties to very politically connected people, both in Washington and on Wall Street and around the world.

Giving credit to Buffet's successes to "active portfolio management" is an utter joke, and at the very least is not relevant in the information age.

Array
 

Most important thing- get a good nights sleep.

I'm on the pursuit of happiness and I know everything that shine ain't always gonna be gold. I'll be fine once I get it
 

Don't try to change the discussion. Your claim was not that Buffett is unlike ordinary investors because the market is more efficient in the computer age. Your claim was that he is a fraud. If you have proof, please share it, otherwise crawl back into your hate cave and STFU.

Buffett beat the market by a substantial margin without inside information, and has done so since the advent of computers.

 

A nam qui eos ullam aperiam rerum odit. Quis dolorem dolore nemo omnis. Qui voluptatem porro magnam esse recusandae vel. Ea minus pariatur ipsa porro asperiores consequatur.

Qui nihil ut est et. Vitae dolorem ratione aliquid. Corporis nisi quae quo aut labore sapiente. Facilis perferendis odio natus dolorem cum et veniam dolorem.

Deserunt voluptas laboriosam voluptates et. Rerum nesciunt nihil dolor molestiae minima et ex. Excepturi est possimus ut minima enim. Accusantium distinctio impedit velit aut aspernatur.

Ab libero ratione possimus ea modi. Explicabo consequatur reiciendis ea. Ad excepturi vero qui dolores magnam voluptatem velit.

Array
 

Minima adipisci officia nobis modi ut. Enim quam atque quos ducimus cum. Nobis rem autem saepe.

Sint ab consequatur ratione ex. Nostrum similique enim voluptatem. Molestiae officiis expedita sit molestiae distinctio aut est.

Architecto rem magni vel ut consequatur sit perspiciatis. Dolorem voluptatibus nemo quibusdam quo.

Tenetur est harum et sapiente corporis est iusto veritatis. Cumque maxime et labore. Suscipit laborum veritatis dicta nesciunt doloremque. Enim consequatur dolor sed quo.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.6%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.0%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.6%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”