Q&A: Distressed credit HF

I’ve learned a ton from this forum over the years. I want to give back with this Q&A – no private messages.

Background: European, STEM undergrad, analyst at a distressed PE, MBA, Ivy League alumnus.

Current: associate at a distressed credit HF (20%+ per annum since inception). Secured, unsecured, sub, prefs, etc. Generalist. Two strategies: public and private markets (primary & secondary). We can do loan-to-own as we have locked up capital.

 

Thanks for doing this. SB’d

Im at a MM credit fund and we do all kinds of stuff in Credit.. from DIP and Asset Finance all the way to Special Sits, RE Debt, Lender Finance, Structured Credit, CMBS, Claims, Distressed Debt, Whole Loans, Orphaned/Dislocated Assets, NPLs. 15 to 20%+ IRR. I am trying to move up to UMM or MF and find it hard to explain my deal experience to recruiters and headhunters on paper. My deal experience is mostly middle market stressed/distressed assets, NPL off banks balance sheet, Aviation/Energy/Hotel lending and corporate rescue financing. How would you suggest I phrase my deal experience on my resume.

Thanks again

 

It starts checking the news on names we have a position. After that, I (i) update models/valuations, (ii) catch-up with advisors/traders and lawyers in live transactions, (iii) and/or have meetings with portfolio companies. Additionally, I source new investments through my network. Some days I hold calls with prospective LPs that are doing DD on us.

This workflow is disrupted in the closing of private investment as my schedule is more restricted.

One book every new employee is required to read is Distressed Debt Analysis by Stephen Moyer.

 

1. Any sub-sectors you've been following lately?

2. What's the split of ideas that you generate vs. names that get passed to you?

3. How are the hours?

4. Any distinct strategies your fund follows when it comes to loan to own (e.g. operational overhaul for retail or manufacturing, cyclical bottom for chemicals / commodities, first to exit BK then roll-up other filers in the industry, etc.)?

5. Do you feel like your ability to think critically about businesses has improved from before you joined your current fund and if so, is that just due to reps or actual mentorship from senior folks? 

 

1. Hotels and industrials impacted by COVID

2. On the public side I'd say 20% generated by me, 30% by traders, and 50% by my bosses. On the private side, 90%+ sourced through advisors.
3. 8 am to 7 pm without live deals on the private side. Whatever it takes with live deals.

4. We split the job with a partner: we focus on the financial restructuring, and the partners focus on running the business. The partner is required to invest new money subordinated to our position. We love to make great operators rich.

5. In terms of hard skills I learned as an analyst at a distressed PE – keep in mind I did not work at IB/consulting. I had to do everything with little oversight and no support from senior members. In terms of soft skills, now I'm learning more about how to create a firm and run a business.

 
Most Helpful

You are not incorrect, but there are lots of ways creditors within the same class can get screwed by one another and I think its dangerous to assume that you are automatically aligned with another investor just because you hold the same security or even in the same ad-hoc group. Even if you are in the creditor group, you can still get screwed over by an aggressive steering committee who will have more sway with the group's legal counterparties holding the pen to an RSA or other proposal. For example, you may technically have the opportunity to participate in a rights offering or other new money plan, but unless someone is on the ball you will miss out on the incentives given to the bigger creditors who are able to back stop the plan. Not to mention the issue of one or a small club of large creditors having the ability to give consent from your class on a priming deal that you can't participate in. The fact is that if you're playing in MM or larger distressed (> $1bn debt), there is not much you can do but go along for the ride if you're only showing up with $20mn - 50mn holding sizes, or are generally unable to write checks for new money deals. Unless you make a point to be overly aggressive with aligning yourself with someone larger you're probably not going to have the best time in the world and the restructuring process turns into much more of a time sink / observation process than value creation opportunity for you. 

 

We create consortiums with other funds, hopefully gaining enough relevance to influence the process. Right now, as banks are not prone to bridge the new money needs, we are restructuring balance sheets before we enter into a situation on a super senior basis or subordinated to other lenders (2L, unsec, mezz) with shorter maturities.

 

1. What're the hours and comp like from the most junior to most senior level.

2. Do non targets with no MBA have a chance of breaking in if they have BB experience or is this field mostly reserved for the elites.

3. What's diversity like on the credit/distressed side (I am black so trying to avoid hostile environments which unfortunately I have experienced before).

4. What background in term of work experience is best to break in.

 

There are failing companies consistently throughout the cycle.

When markets crash, we raise capital and divest after 2-4 years. We become smaller/opportunistic/funky and wait for the next crash opportunity. 

There's an enormous multi-year opportunity now.

 
  1. How much does your work vary between doing PE-style long term work on loan-to-own deals and asset manager-style work on making smaller positions within credit structures?

  2. Before joining the job, how did you make a network of people across distressed? Do you view having a network within distressed as being any more important than within another asset class?

 

In the middle of the COVID crash, we were 80% in public/liquid securities and 20% in private. As we divested in Q3-Q4, now we are 80% in privates. From that figure, 30% is loan-to-own, 30% is new money with balance sheet restructuring, 20% is bridge financing, 10% is new money without restructuring.

 

What is your outlook on the distressed credit space in the near and long term? There seems to be an oversupply of capital in the space hunting for opportunities in relation to the amount of distressed co’s.

What does your idea generation and vetting process look like?

Recs to enter the space from an Rx role?

 

Outlook: hard, especially if you are a multi-billion fund (see the returns of Oaktree, Angelo Gordon, King Street, etc); good if you are below

Idea generation: through advisors/banks

RX: it should be easier now as RX banks will need help with the deal flow that is coming

 

Definitively yes, although mentality is different. One of my bosses comes from a senior position in a BB bank managing distressed loans. He has an A+ network. After the BB, he went into a distressed PE, and then into my firm.

 

Hey, thank you for doing this.

I am an IB analyst (6 months into my first year) and am interested in distressed asset investing/activism. One firm that really catches my eye is Brookfield Asset Management. Any advice on breaking in would be much appreciated. I am currently working at a boutique bank in Toronto in the Merchant/Investment Banking division.

I am starting to take on modelling now, so any advice on how I can pick it up faster and really become proficient at it along with sharpening my accounting skills would be much appreciated!

Thank you

 

What made you want to pursue an MBA if you already had distressed buyside experience? Why not network / lateral directly to a credit HF? Do you think your MBA provides meaningful value to you day-to-day now? Did you go to H/S/W or one of the other top programs?

 

I tried a lateral move but my current firm did not even answer my email. Everyone above me in my firm has an MBA from a top school.

MBA: do not expect it to be harder than an analyst program in Wall Street. Network and people are the key drivers for the decision. I met my future wife in my MBA class, so I'm biased. I went to a top program.

 

How does your firm handle covenant analysis - thinking in terms of (i) relative time/importance spent and (ii) process: first pass by the investment team with legal advisory follow-up as needed / outsource to a law firm / other? If there's enough wiggle room to do a non-pro rata priming deal under existing docs and the circumstances call for it, do you look at that as a reason to stay away or opportunity to be a provider of additional capital / benefit from that looseness? Assuming the answer is 'it depends on the situation,' what factors do you consider?

 

On the private side, covenants are critical. 

On the public side, the legal analysis comes after reviewing the business and the situation. Frequently we do not have more than a couple of days to establish a position as traders get rid of cheap securities fast. We hire legal advisors when we have doubts. To avoid potential legal risks, we do not generally do PE-backed deals. We spend quite a lot of time thinking of ways to deteriorate creditors' positioning to gain comfort with the downside.

 

How viable is lateraling to a distressed credit fund from a workouts / restructuring group on the buyside? We also do a small amount of distressed investing, although typically in firms we're already restructuring / invested in. 

 

Base on your profile, the question is whether you can source good deals on a sustainable basis. One former employee at my firm was a top trader in a trading desk of a BB. He sourced good opportunities for 18 months – as he knew where top investors invested. After that, he put us on bad and binary deals – and he had to leave.

 

I am interested in doing a JD/MBA from a top 10 program with interests in RX and distressed investing. In your case, how did you know distressed investing was the right fit for you? I was recently networking with a JD/MBA at a top school who recommended to consider your personal 'world view' when pursing investing styles (distressed vs something more growth oriented)

 

I am sensitive to losing money. I learned early that distressed investing is about limiting your downside and making some money in the recovery. That was appealing to me.

Distressed vs. Growth: 100% agree. Personal fit is the bottom line. While distressed has an oversupply of funds, growth seems to have an undersupply - especially on the buyouts side as lenders do not provide aggressive turns of leverage. But that will change.

 

What about credit and distressed investing interested you?

 

What materials/book/podcast would you recommend to an undergrad looking for a career in distressed credit? 

 

Hi, thanks for the Q&A. 

Currently at a fund doing mostly performing (unitranche/2l/pref) + some rescue private deals; no experience in public.

Do you have any advice on how to prepare a “trade idea” / “case study” ahead of the interviews? Note I am not talking about a case study where you are given a name but rather finding a situation that fits the bill and then doing some initial analysis on this. I guess equivalent in equities would be a stock pitch.

Many thanks.

 

When you make investing mistakes, are they more likely to be coming from making a wrong fundamental call on the business, from covenant related issues, or valuation issues (i.e. paying too much)?

A related point - how would you rank the skill set above (valuation, industry understanding, and covenant/legal knowledge)?

Thanks. 

 

Assuming that you're working in Euro shop / did work in a Euro shop then did an MBA, could I ask why you decided to do an MBA and do you think it helps through promotion in Euro? (working off the assumption that Euro area dont really need an MBA to senior roles based off what my senior peers are doing and have done).

Array
 

Facilis vel sequi quis consequatur exercitationem tempora perferendis. Incidunt deleniti et eos. Et quisquam rerum magnam quo iure non voluptatem. Recusandae corporis aut sunt enim incidunt. Eius unde laudantium quia et voluptas eveniet deleniti. Velit dicta ad consequatur esse omnis ex qui.

Velit quis et quisquam dolores. Excepturi quos totam perspiciatis deserunt. Omnis quibusdam eaque ea doloremque.

Quo et voluptate nemo. Quae qui vel dolorem nisi. Reiciendis fugit quam eius in. Et nam quis perspiciatis cumque labore iusto.

 

Qui qui hic in ad fugiat hic occaecati quo. Sit perspiciatis voluptas reiciendis aut esse natus dolorum accusamus. Aspernatur ut numquam quia dolore nemo at. Ea rerum tempore nostrum quia ad. Nihil fuga dolore optio distinctio architecto rerum. Quo dolorem debitis qui consectetur sit aspernatur amet quis. Perspiciatis asperiores sed dolorem et.

Temporibus a est perspiciatis sit. Quibusdam et porro doloribus quia voluptas officiis corporis. Qui pariatur placeat libero asperiores. Nam dolor aut quidem odio. Vel enim quo id molestiae. Qui sunt et sint non. Eveniet voluptates dolores explicabo nihil reprehenderit numquam dolores.

Magnam quaerat earum officiis. Libero quo perferendis itaque tenetur tenetur et. Qui quo est qui asperiores distinctio repellat. Aut nulla nisi autem eum cupiditate. Voluptas nobis consequuntur sit minima ut. Aliquid praesentium ut nam.

 

Illo laudantium ipsa quae. Et et aspernatur voluptatem maiores nobis unde. Incidunt harum vero vitae eum voluptatibus quod a.

Fuga ducimus sed molestias consequatur non facilis modi facere. Vero nihil dolorum sed dolore quo. Explicabo recusandae qui ea veritatis labore aliquid omnis. A voluptatum quas numquam quo tempora amet minima dicta. Voluptatibus voluptas sit doloremque quae qui eius rerum. Corporis molestiae consequuntur nihil minima. Quaerat ducimus nulla numquam asperiores ut harum.

Omnis praesentium iure et aut fugit. Nihil quae doloremque quo ad. Et error aut dolores non aliquam et. Molestiae facere dolore harum nesciunt molestias.

Quia autem totam voluptatibus quod. Aut quia tempore maiores consequuntur dolores tempore cupiditate. Aspernatur neque et et eum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (22) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (250) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”