Bulge Bracket 2015 Rankings

Here we are again. Another person has posted another useless post. But, I guarantee I am not the only one who is simple curious for shit's sake. Again, I am sure these mean nothing, but I (and I am sure many others) are just curious what others think and it would be cool to see how things vary depending on your background.

Now without further adieu, here are my rankings for the bulge bracket by NAME only (aka not by division or product etc)

1) GS/JPM 3) MS/BAML 5) CS/Barclays 7) Deutsche Bank 8) Citi 9) BNP Paribas (Even though not BB, consider it better than UBS) 10) UBS

83 Comments
 

Will someone from Citi run across no mans land, take a leap of courage and sling his faeces or will a GS comrade selfishly dump his excrement bucket on his MS ally for being mentioned in the same breath as if it were the French to the British? I don't know. Let the battle commence.

 

There's really no need to comment on this, but I'm absolutely sure a sophomore or freshman will look at this and take it face value. (And hopefully not take BNP over UBS).

So, for the sake of those guys here's in my opinion a more informed "ranking" to CONSIDER only, NOT to 100% follow. For all those reading out there, it depends on group, location (London/NYC/SF/etc), etc. But seriously, having interned at a BB and did FT recruiting, I would not recommend taking OPs ranking into account.

1) GS/MS 1a) JPM (arguable, seen some peers take over MS) 2) CS 2a) BAML (arguable, seen peers take over CS) 3) Citi/Barclays/DB 4) UBS

You can look at M&A/IPO league tables etc all you want, but historical reputation, group placement, and past calibre of analysts should still be the main emphasis. CS might be 12th on the league table today and have been behind BarCap, but CS guys have even in the most recent cycle placed noticeably better than BarCap even though they have been trailing them league table wise for a while now. (Also have to take into account CS as a whole is more lean than even say BAML, etc). And exit opps are ultimately what it comes to. (As seen in BX > Everything)

Basically, it depends.

 
dukeofdukeI want you to rank them!

Goldman Sachs Morgan Stanley JP Morgan Credit Suisse Citi Douche Bank Barcap BAML UBS

Get ready for a bunch of losers aspiring to get BAML/UBS jobs come in here and complain about rankings being "meaningless." Yeah, sure bet you'd think that if you were at GS/MS.

This is retarded. Are you really saying that there's that much of a difference between Credit Suisse and Citi? If this post is even in the slightest bit serious, you're much better off with having 3 or so tiers rather than an outright ranking.

 
TimothyBryce1. UCONN 2. UK/UNC Winner 3. Butler 4. VCU

Ranking banks is so dumb, but definitely something I would expect from a Dukie

You are mistaken. I go to a target (Harvard, Princeton, Wharton - I consider the rest to be semi-targets or non-targets). I just happen to be considered royalty at Duke because of the large donations my family gives them.

 

tollolollololol

"Have you ever tried to use a chain with 3 weak links? I have, and now I no longer own an arctic wolf." -Dwight Schrute
 

It depends on location. IE DB is much stronger in Europe, but much weaker in NYC. In New York, it's pretty much impossible to think of bulges by pure rank, as it's highly group centric. ie, Citi M&A is probably better than almost all the groups at Barcap, but the same can't be said on average. I'd say the ranks you posted are relatively accurate if you consider the top group only. In aggregate though, it's much easier to bundle in tiers. On the same tier, you should definitely pick on group and not on prestige. For NYC, it's more like

GS | MS JPM | | CS Citi, BAML, Barcap DB | | | UBS

 

WOW AWESOME GREAT.

What did this accomplish?

"Look, you're my best friend, so don't take this the wrong way. In twenty years, if you're still livin' here, comin' over to my house to watch the Patriots games, still workin' construction, I'll fuckin' kill you. That's not a threat, that's a fact.
 

1) Goldman Sachs 2) J.P. Morgan 3) Morgan Stanley 4) Bank of America Merrill Lynch 5) Barclays 6) Credit Suisse Group AG 7) Citigroup 8) Deutsche Bank 9) UBS

I am skeptical about who actually works in banking here. I would rank J.P. Morgan and Barclays higher. J.P. Morgan has been killing in fees over the last few years and has generated the most fees across all products. Both banks are top five across all regions in terms of announced deals. It is true that fees/deal are lower for Barclays but the fact that Barclays have the ability to win deals is a testament to their growth in the U.S. over the last few years.

 
Powa23

1) Goldman Sachs
2) J.P. Morgan
3) Morgan Stanley
4) Bank of America Merrill Lynch
5) Barclays
6) Credit Suisse Group AG
7) Citigroup
8) Deutsche Bank
9) UBS

I am skeptical about who actually works in banking here. I would rank J.P. Morgan and Barclays higher. J.P. Morgan has been killing in fees over the last few years and has generated the most fees across all products. Both banks are top five across all regions in terms of announced deals. It is true that fees/deal are lower for Barclays but the fact that Barclays have the ability to win deals is a testament to their growth in the U.S. over the last few years.

This, although I might swap CS with BAML.
 

bahahaha... 5 Greatest Rappers of all time

Dy-Lon

Dy-Lon

Dy-Lon

Dy-Lon

&

Dy-Lon

That is how I feel about this topic... Cuz I spit hot fire. And this topic is stupid... Centerview is the new gold standard of bankers and their paychecks back it up

Oh and Piper is making a run for it

 

"Prestige rankings are pointless. Its more critical to be in a top group at that particular investment bank."

Completely disagree. Top banks matter since they lead to exit ops outside of just investment banking. You are far better off approaching an Apple/Google/GE/IBM recruiter with a top bank on your resume.

For PE, they may look at the group. But in just about every other exit opp, they do not care about the group anywhere near as much. Private equity has probably become less of a focus since its attractiveness has gone down, so individual groups may matter even less now than previously.

 
  1. GS
  2. MS
  3. JPM
4. BAML
  1. Barclays
  2. Citi
  3. CS
8. DB
  1. UBS

Writing this from my perspective European IBD employee. GS is obvious no.1 looking at the prestige with MS just behind. JPM and baml are doing well in overall fee's and feels like both are growing quite a lot, looking to attack the top. Barclays is for me the European giant in IBD and I feel like they have quite a lot going on at least in Europe.

The surest way to make a monkey of a man is to quote him.
 
ModernMonkey

1. GS
2. MS
3. JPM
4. BAML
---
5. Barclays
6. Citi
7. CS
8. DB
---
9. UBS

Writing this from my perspective European IBD employee. GS is obvious no.1 looking at the prestige with MS just behind. JPM and baml are doing well in overall fee's and feels like both are growing quite a lot, looking to attack the top. Barclays is for me the European giant in IBD and I feel like they have quite a lot going on at least in Europe.

I'd say I agree your rankings the most. CS had a terrible year, let's just hope they can get back from that.

 

http://fn.dealogic.com/fn/MARank.htm

Global Announced M&A Ranking - 01 Jan - 30 Dec 2013

Pos. Advisor Value $m No. %share Previous YTD 1 <span class="keyword_link"><a href="//www.wallstreetoasis.com/company/goldman-sachs" target="_blank">Goldman Sachs</a></span> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 718,127 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;362 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;24.8 1 2 <span class="keyword_link"><a href="//www.wallstreetoasis.com/company/jpmorgan-chase">JPMorgan</a></span> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 664,372 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;276 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;23.0 2 3 <span class="keyword_link"><a href="//www.wallstreetoasis.com/company/morgan-stanley">Morgan Stanley</a></span> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 598,974 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;307 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;20.7 3 4 <span class="keyword_link"><a href="//www.wallstreetoasis.com/company/bank-of-america-merrill-lynch">Bank of America</a></span> <span class="keyword_link"><a href="//www.wallstreetoasis.com/company/bank-of-america-merrill-lynch">Merrill</a></span> Lynch &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;547,418 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;241 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;18.9 8 5 <span class="keyword_link"><a href="//www.wallstreetoasis.com/company/barclays-capital">Barclays</a></span> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 475,669 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;211 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;16.4 5 6 <span class="keyword_link"><a href="//www.wallstreetoasis.com/company/ubs-ag">UBS</a></span> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 335,716 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;187 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;11.6 10 7 <span class="keyword_link"><a href="//www.wallstreetoasis.com/company/deutsche-bank">Deutsche Bank</a></span> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 293,100 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;190 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;10.1 7 8 <span class="keyword_link"><a href="//www.wallstreetoasis.com/company/citigroup">Citi</a></span> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 287,148 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;217 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;9.9 4 9 <span class="keyword_link"><a href="//www.wallstreetoasis.com/company/credit-suisse">Credit Suisse</a></span> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 225,910 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;232 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;7.8 6 10 <span class="keyword_link"><a href="//www.wallstreetoasis.com/company/lazard">Lazard</a></span> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 209,866 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;208 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;7.3 11 11 <span class="keyword_link"><a href="//www.wallstreetoasis.com/company/guggenheim-partners" target="_blank">Guggenheim</a></span> Partners LLC &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 159,090 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;12 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;5.5 141 12 <span class="keyword_link"><a href="//www.wallstreetoasis.com/tag/moelis">Moelis</a></span> &amp; Co &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 147,148 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;92 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;5.1 22 13 <span class="keyword_link"><a href="//www.wallstreetoasis.com/company/bnp-paribas">BNP</a></span> Paribas &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 139,852 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;113 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;4.8 15 14 <span class="keyword_link"><a href="//www.wallstreetoasis.com/company/rothschild" target="_blank">Rothschild</a></span> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 129,780 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;213 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;4.5 9 15 <span class="keyword_link"><a href="//www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/centerview-partners-0">Centerview Partners</a></span> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 105,853 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;27 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;3.7 18 16 <span class="keyword_link"><a href="//www.wallstreetoasis.com/company/evercore" target="_blank">Evercore</a></span> Partners Inc &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 96,979 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;125 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;3.4 13 17 <span class="keyword_link"><a href="//www.wallstreetoasis.com/company/rbc-royal-bank-of-canada">RBC</a></span> Capital Markets &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 84,944 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;139 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2.9 14 18 <span class="keyword_link"><a href="//www.wallstreetoasis.com/company/hsbc">HSBC</a></span> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 67,860 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;71 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2.4 17 19 <span class="keyword_link"><a href="//www.wallstreetoasis.com/company/wells-fargo-and-company">Wells Fargo</a></span> Securities &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 66,814 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;62 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2.3 29 20 <span class="keyword_link"><a href="//www.wallstreetoasis.com/company/jefferies-company">Jefferies</a></span> LLC &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 60,487 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;118 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2.1 16 Subtotal &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 1,805,868 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2,252 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;62.4 Total &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 2,892,803 &nbsp;&nbsp;37,030 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;100.0
 
mossy695

http://fn.dealogic.com/fn/MARank.htm

Global Announced M&A Ranking - 01 Jan - 30 Dec 2013

Pos. Advisor Value $m No. %share Previous YTD
1 Goldman Sachs           718,127         362         24.8 1
2 JPMorgan           664,372         276         23.0 2
3 Morgan Stanley           598,974         307         20.7 3
4 Bank of America Merrill Lynch         547,418         241         18.9 8
5 Barclays           475,669         211         16.4 5
6 UBS           335,716         187         11.6 10
7 Deutsche Bank           293,100         190         10.1 7
8 Citi           287,148         217           9.9 4
9 Credit Suisse           225,910         232           7.8 6
10 Lazard           209,866         208           7.3 11
11 Guggenheim Partners LLC           159,090           12           5.5 141
12 Moelis & Co           147,148          92           5.1 22
13 BNP Paribas           139,852         113           4.8 15
14 Rothschild           129,780         213           4.5 9
15 Centerview Partners           105,853           27           3.7 18
16 Evercore Partners Inc             96,979         125           3.4 13
17 RBC Capital Markets             84,944         139           2.9 14
18 HSBC             67,860           71           2.4 17
19 Wells Fargo Securities             66,814           62           2.3 29
20 Jefferies LLC             60,487         118           2.1 16
Subtotal        1,805,868      2,252         62.4
Total      2,892,803   37,030       100.0

cuz m&a fees mean everything lol nevermind ecm/dcm/other products
speed boost blaze
 

I usually go by sexy deals. For example, the sexiest deals are usually swooped by GS/MS (although MS has been getting shafted more and more after FB).

Then I would say JPM grabs the next/same tier of sexy.

It drops off steeply, but CS had quite a few this year. (e.g. Nieman earlier this year)

BC gets some pretty tasty ones in their industrials sector. (I think I remember seeing Boeing)

BAML usually gets its hands on a little bit of everything, and even wins main underwriter on an extremely nice deal once in a while.

DB is huge on anything with large debt and dealing with bonds.

Haven't seen a TON of Citi this year, but that doesn't mean they're falling by any means.

UBS is downgrading its IB so...

That's my view of the BBs after this year. I don't like ranking them one-by-one, but instead just know what's been going on.

 
Joshua93

I usually go by sexy deals. For example, the sexiest deals are usually swooped by GS/MS (although MS has been getting shafted more and more after FB).

Then I would say JPM grabs the next/same tier of sexy.

It drops off steeply, but CS had quite a few this year. (e.g. Nieman earlier this year)

BC gets some pretty tasty ones in their industrials sector. (I think I remember seeing Boeing)

BAML usually gets its hands on a little bit of everything, and even wins main underwriter on an extremely nice deal once in a while.

DB is huge on anything with large debt and dealing with bonds.

Haven't seen a TON of Citi this year, but that doesn't mean they're falling by any means.

UBS is downgrading its IB so...

That's my view of the BBs after this year. I don't like ranking them one-by-one, but instead just know what's been going on.

Another flaw in this site are aspiring Summer Analysts like yourself repeating what others have told you.. UBS is not downgrading their Investment Banking Division you dumbass. They are cutting FICC of S&T, which is PART of the Investment Bank, hence the confusion. Advisory and IBD are not changing at all in UBS, so people need to get their facts straight on this board.
 

Voluptate expedita voluptatem voluptatem aut. Facere nihil rerum quia et hic dignissimos. Aut distinctio aut nisi aliquam vel et dolor omnis. Sit excepturi sint impedit dolorem sunt a necessitatibus. Dignissimos tempora voluptas nisi doloribus aut. Totam fugiat quis placeat facilis. Molestiae dolorum id et a id sunt unde.

Ratione cumque veritatis harum necessitatibus. Nisi beatae quia ut consectetur. Officiis ratione voluptate est sed nihil et quia. Consequatur quas vel asperiores hic.

Placeat est quaerat repellendus illo. Minima in consequuntur ullam qui. Assumenda harum molestiae ipsum repellendus perferendis perferendis omnis.

Deserunt eos et nihil sed eos est. Non ducimus iusto ea omnis ab consequatur. Id porro minima ipsum ab vel sunt.

 

Labore voluptatibus aliquam distinctio esse exercitationem ex. Qui quidem illum tempora porro officiis optio iure voluptatem. Quaerat optio autem qui placeat. Iste similique molestiae voluptatum rerum. Ut sit explicabo eligendi et quae quia vitae.

Aut consequatur itaque eius qui. Eum est molestias rerum quia alias totam dolorem. Quas dolorem labore libero ut optio exercitationem debitis. Omnis magnam voluptatem qui consequuntur. Quam ea nemo placeat ad ut a molestiae.

Aut accusamus rem sint laboriosam et. Similique in quo fugiat sint recusandae. Aut expedita cumque aliquam illum.

Ab unde soluta quam deserunt occaecati voluptates voluptatum. Et quas deserunt facilis est. Iste eos eveniet quis delectus nobis earum. Cum dolor deserunt mollitia eveniet quos eum illum. Quidem et vel qui dolore. Et eius quis aspernatur praesentium cumque voluptas id.

 

Eum facere esse velit distinctio repellat at nihil. Fuga nisi suscipit sit maiores et id. Vero aut quos est veritatis. Ipsa deleniti ullam eaque animi quod ullam adipisci ipsam. Amet perferendis voluptas ut aliquam non ipsa culpa quae.

Et ratione accusamus quidem rerum. Recusandae molestiae animi sunt eos nulla quod. Provident eius impedit quia et unde rerum. Explicabo in eum nisi esse quod qui. Eveniet praesentium eaque molestiae at. Corporis sit omnis itaque laboriosam doloribus.

Modi corrupti ipsa ex nisi. Quae quia autem blanditiis nulla. Ullam dolorem ut in vel. Voluptas iste repellat fuga culpa maxime ut esse.

Non doloremque excepturi et qui. Ea rerum quam id asperiores blanditiis amet.

"My name's Ralph Cox, and I'm from where ever's not gonna get me hit"
 

Ea perferendis tempora omnis doloribus qui perferendis eaque. Cumque dolorem minus ex inventore quis sequi in. Tempore incidunt atque quisquam adipisci praesentium commodi incidunt quod. Velit nam aut libero nulla voluptatem est. Explicabo sapiente optio delectus molestiae. Est dicta unde quas esse molestias quos beatae.

Mollitia eius dolorem quasi provident. Blanditiis ratione et dolores odio labore sapiente omnis non. Optio et maxime qui iure perferendis expedita voluptatem. Vel laboriosam non quia sint minima. Facilis quae vel voluptates ut animi. Voluptatum quisquam est amet.

Odit itaque sapiente perferendis eos eveniet est maiores quasi. Qui similique aperiam mollitia ipsam eum sequi culpa. Et qui velit saepe optio. Quam iusto tenetur eveniet ab. Molestiae sed fugiat quia voluptatem voluptatum.

"They are all former investment bankers that were laid off in the economic collapse that Nancy Pelosi caused. They have no marketable skills, but by God they work hard."

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”