Bulge Brackets and Boutiques: The rise of new generation of banks

M&A Boom

If you’re working for the M&A department of any investment bank, you have likely been having a healthy and busy year which is about to culminate with a fat check in your hand. According to Fortune, “Bonuses for associates and analysts….in merger and acquisition divisions of banks could range from $100,000 to $150,000”. Assuming you’re base salary is about $85,000, you are looking at a total high-end-compensation of $235,000, pre-tax.

This isn’t totally surprising given that M&A sector has seen record activity and is on track to hit $4.58 trillion in deals this year.

Moreover, depending upon your work, you may even earn more. For instance, if you are working at an elite boutique such as Moelis or Greenhill, odds are you will out earn your Bulge Bracket peers.

The Growth of Boutiques

In fact, boutiques have been on the rise. According to the Wall Street Journal, “In a sign of their prowess, there were just two financial advisers on the $40 billion-plus acquisition of Kraft Foods Group Inc. announced Wednesday (earlier this year), neither a big Wall Street bank: Lazard and Centerview Partners LLC”. Also, the recent IPOs of Houlihan Lokey and PJT Partners only further highlights the growing presence of boutique investment banks.

The smaller the better?

Moreover, boutiques are also gaining ground on other metrics. According to Vault, Houlihan Lokey offers the best compensation, work-life balance and culture of all the banks. In fact, aside from some charts, most of the top rankings in any category sport a heavy presence of boutiques. For example, just look at this chart.

Granted that banks like Goldman and Morgan Stanely will offer you some of the best exit opportunities, having Greenhill, Moelis or Lazard on your resume will secure you exits not too far from the known names.

Talent? Where does it flow?

So from the viewpoint of a budding undergrad who is looking to pursue a career in IBanking, boutiques offer an overall better work-experience, compensation, work-life balance and, at the least, match most of the offerings of Bulge Brackets.

Naturally, then, I would expect talent to heavily consider boutiques as an alternative to big banks, given that the boutiques are in the product and industry groups they want to work in.

Now, I know Vault rankings are to be taken with a grain of salt. However, it is still hard to neglect the fact that Bulge Brackets occasionally top their charts.

What happens next?

So, what do you guys think? Is the lure of Wall Street still going to continue to be dominated by Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan and the rest? Or, are we witnessing a fundamental transformation of the Street with the growth of newer banks such as Moelis, Blackstone and Centerview Partners?

 
Best Response

IMO boutiques were and will continue to be a platform for the career banker or senior banker. Boutiques are where senior MDs go, and take their clients with them, in order to maximize their deal cut. If you're a career banker, the economics just make too much sense.

Top BBs will continue to draw more junior bankers because of the BB brand that opens a "gateway" to virtually anything finance related or otherwise. Goldman, MS, JPM open a portal to limitless possibilities inherently associated with the brand. You can literally stop a person on the street and ask them about Goldman or MS and get a nod or response -- good luck getting their take on Centerview or Moelis.

 
Funniest

"You can literally stop a person on the street and ask them about Goldman or MS and get a nod or response -- good luck getting their take on Centerview or Moelis."

Seems like a legit way to guide your career.

"My aunt sally hasn't heard of KKR but she knows Bank of America...I'll go to BofA"

iggs99988:

IMO boutiques were and will continue to be a platform for the career banker or senior banker. Boutiques are where senior MDs go, and take their clients with them, in order to maximize their deal cut. If you're a career banker, the economics just make too much sense.

Top BBs will continue to draw more junior bankers because of the BB brand that opens a "gateway" to virtually anything finance related or otherwise. Goldman, MS, JPM open a portal to limitless possibilities inherently associated with the brand. You can literally stop a person on the street and ask them about Goldman or MS and get a nod or response -- good luck getting their take on Centerview or Moelis.

 

I will echo what has been said many times before: BBs are best for people who plan on leaving the industry later; boutiques are best for career bankers. However, on the topic of graduates going to boutiques: the major problem is the dearth of structured programs among boutiques. What many people underestimate is that college students are generally highly risk averse (especially ones going into banking) and don't want to stick their necks out to do the heavy networking needed to get into a boutique. That's why BBs continue to be the most popular destinations, even if they are worse in several ways compared to boutiques.

 

I've heard of 2 Associates in Houlihan's London office being wheeled out on stretchers due to exhaustion. A former colleague who worked at said office said it was the most poisonous culture she has ever encountered. I really wouldn't take anything the Vault Rankings say seriously.

I'd still take a BB over an EB due to the better resources, larger analyst classes, and wider brand recognition (outside of finance).

 

Don't have much to say on BB versus EB in general. On Houlihan: out of all my friends in banking, the one at HLHZ RX in Chicago is by far the happiest. Granted, he's probably making a bit less than the NYC kids, but then again, cost of living adjustment, and he works maybe 60-70 hours per week. Rarely works weekends (just spent Friday-Sunday in the Bay Area with me and a few buds, actually).

 

Est optio neque culpa sed ipsum. Earum enim perferendis doloribus nesciunt sequi molestiae. Quia officiis eum enim. Qui qui deleniti repellendus libero ut enim qui cupiditate.

Dolores dolorem sapiente laudantium quam non error nobis quisquam. Et voluptatem in voluptates. Inventore excepturi non blanditiis maxime odio aspernatur nemo.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”