D/E weights in WACC formula

If a company currently only has $200 million of bank debt at 8% coupon rate and DOES NOT plan on issuing anymore debt in the future, what amount of debt should I use in my equity beta and WACC calculation?

Also, since the company doesn't have any bonds outstanding, can I just use the book value of this debt?

I know the firm's cost of debt should reflect the average future long-term cost of debt, but since the company doesn't plan on issuing any more debt in the future, should I just use the coupon rate on the existing debt?

In general, is it better to use the target capital structure or the current capital structure in market value? I know market value is the common approach, but given the volatility of the market, I feel like using market value can sometimes imply a distorted D/E ratio that is not consistent with the target capital structure.

Thank you for your input.

 
Best Response

A couple of points here, lets go in order:

You seem to be confused. You should UNLEVER the comps' betas at the respective comps' CURRENT debt/cap ratio and RELEVER the beta at the target Company's target debt/cap ratio.

The WACC is meant to be calculated in perpetuity. Therefore you should always use the target cap structure (debt/equity weights) and the interest rate associated with that target cap structure.

If the Company does not EVER plan on issuing more debt, then the target debt/cap ratio is likely lower than the existing debt/cap ratio. This of-course assumes that the Company continues to grow (i.e. market cap continues to expand), which means the debt/cap will continue to decline into the future.

If the above is true, the interest rate corresponding to the target cap structure is also likely lower than the rate that exists today. As the debt/cap ratio falls, the Company becomes less risky from a fixed income perspective, and the interest rate should therefore fall as well.

I find the above scenario unlikely. Financing an enterprise with just equity into perpetuity is an expensive (and frankly, unintelligent) proposition.

More likely is that management expects the Company to maintain the current debt/cap ratio into the future. If this is the case, then you could use the current debt/cap ratio as the target debt/cap ratio, and the current interest rate (i.e. 8%) as the target interest rate.

Make sure that the current debt/cap and interest rate are "normalized". If the current market cap is deflated (i.e. due to horrible market conditions), the target debt/cap should be lower than the current debt/cap. If the current interest rate is deflated (due to exceptionally low ST LIBOR rates) the target interest rate is likely higher than the current interest rate.

 

Thank you all for your answers.

My understanding is that the company plans on paying down its existing bank debt and then not re-issuing anymore debt in the foreseeable future (NEVER is probably a strong word).

However, doesn't this imply that its target capital structure is 100% equity? If so, shouldn't I omitt debt completely from my WACC?

This is what confuses me. If I calculate WACC for the company as a going concern, I feel like I should include 0% debt, but obiously they DO have debt on their current balance sheet and there is no telling what exactly is going to happen in the future.

Omitting debt completely feels wrong, but that is the target cap structure I hear the company wants to have.

angry_keebler, you mentioned that I should use a lower cost of debt to reflect the lower risk of a declining D/E ratio. How should I compute this cost of debt. The company has no outstanding bonds or credit rating.

Should I look at the company's coverage ratio and try to compute the defauly spread to add to a risk free rate?

Thanks for your help.

 

take for example your S&P LCD Comps say the market is issuing debt with a coverage ratio of 2.0x which means EBITDA / Interest = 2.0x...

Assume: cost of debt = 6% EBITDA = $10m Mv of equity = $100m

So: $10m / 2.0x = $5m of interest $5m / 6% = $83.3m of ideal debt

Target Debt / Equity as per market conditions is now 83.3/100 = 83.3%...

Now you create sensitivities on the coverage multiples to see various d/e scenarios...

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (145) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”