Title says it all pretty much. List anyone from any field, could be philosophy, politics, economics, whatever you find interesting. For me, I’ve been listening to more Sam Harris and Matt Dillahunty recently, perhaps this thread could help me find some less mainstream people I could read up on.
| +50 | Interviews Are So Fake | 33 | 4h | |
| +33 | 2024 UK Election - Tories finished? | 21 | 1d | |
| +29 | ADHD ! | 13 | 2h | |
| +28 | Being Christian in investment banking | 14 | 2d | |
| +26 | Non-Competes Banned | 30 | 6s | |
| How do I become Sigma | 15 | 22h | ||
| +19 | Moelis has the cutest Analysts? | 4 | 2d | |
| +18 | Best NYC neighborhood for single 30M | 12 | 3d | |
| +16 | Underage intern, drinking? | 7 | 2d | |
| +13 | Secretive vs Universal Prestige? | 7 | 2d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
The great philosophers we know as CRE, financeabc, and Ozymandia. They are the Plato, Aristotle, and Socrates of our times.
Haha how about neink michaelthomas and @PrivateTechquity" , and honorable mention PeterMBA2018
The Ben Shapiro caucus of WSO
You might want to compare those users to some other philosophers. Aristotle, Plato and Socrates were actually not big fans of democracy.
So it's a perfect match!
I've always considered myself more of a Mediocrates
Thomas Sowell.
Sowell is pretty great. Perhaps one of the few people willing to point out the idiocy of the way Affirmarice Action is structured.
Also one of my favorite quotes "There are no solutions, only trade-offs." Summed up the idea of Pareto Efficiency beautifully.
Malcolm X
Edit: I was waiting for the white guy/girl to sling MS. Keep it coming.
I hung out with his daughter Malaak a couple times in NYC.
Awesome!
Malcom X was racist af. Quit race baiting, hypocrite
-white devil
Remember you called yourself that, not me. At least you're self aware.
based
Jordan Peterson
I was expecting JBP to be on here. I find his lectures interesting, though I don’t quite know where I stand with his definition of God and his opinions on religion in general. Hope he comes back soon, he did a few videos with his daughter so that shows some promise.
I'm kind of not a fan of Sam Harris for the same reason. I kept on hearing that he was this really smart atheist and after listening to a few lectures, I was like, "really that's it. Your best arguments are religious people have done bad things like the crusades and we should all aim for secular utiliarianism?"....I mean just not all that ground-breaking.
I think the guy is just a good speaker and draws people in, but the ideas just aren't that novel and I think you can agree with that whether you're an atheist or not.
>Builds career lecturing about discipline and personal responsibility
>Becomes addicted to benzos
.
That’s cute.
Both Peterson & Harris are hacks.
Nasim Taleb ftw.
Is this serious? Taleb is just about as hacky as it gets. Failed trader with a big ego.
You know you really need to get the fuck off WSO when the site worship human trash like Jordan Peterson.
Economics: Paul Samuelson (for his emphasis on pragmatic "smart regulation" and also formalizing econ concepts into math), Milton Friedman (for pretty much defining the role of monetary policy and defining the modern philosophy of free market capitalism), Fredriech Hayek (for defining the role of constitutions in an economic-political systems).
Philosophy: Noam Chomsky(as a self described Libertarian Socialist/Social Libertarian he's very spot on how distorted American libertarianism, American liberalism, and American socialism are. Pretty much one of the few truly "left-wing" intellectuals who's not a hypocrite).
AI: Handful number of people from Lex Fridman podcast - Joscha Bach, Manolis Kellis, Erik Brynjolfsson, Andrew Huberman, ... These people have redefined what AI means for me. You can define consciousness, intelligence, and decision making to a degree so abstract that you can view governments and companies as essentially being AI systems; or plants as being intelligent in different time scales than we are.
The gist is that consciousness, neuroscience, psychology, AI, organizational behavior, and economics are all related.
History: Dan Carlin (hardcore history is awesome)
On Noam Chomsky - can you refer me to some of his more objective work? Everything I've heard of his seems to be pretty aggressively anti-american.
Unfortunately, my source is a foreign non-english source that summarizes his works (with citations).
Surprisingly, I agree with lots of his views.
Examples of views I agree with are:
1) Humanity, regardless of their culture and language, share a common form of "rationality". (Evidenced by the structure of variety of languages and what that means for each culture thinks at a most fundamental level). Hence if everyone can just calm the fuck down and practice discourse, constructive criticism, and proper debate then we can actually solve many of the world's problems.
2) Free market capitalism in its true form is a good system that makes everyone free, better off, and ultimately equal. Unfortunately, greedy and power hungry businesspeople and politicians have been pushing for crony capitalism under the disguise of "free market capitalism".(His criticism of America is the justified because he sees America as the biggest force of crony capitalism). He says the same thing about socialism - its promises have been used as a disguise by power hungry people to push for authoritarianism.
3) This is essentially why both systems get a bad rep. So even criticizing both systems are rather moot, because what they're really criticizing are crony capitalism and authoritarianism, the source of which are one and the same, power and greed. Only difference is when these power hungry and greedy people go into government, they'll push for authoritarianism. When the same people go into business, they'll push for crony capitalism.
@MonacoMonkey, Frank Yang
This is some seriously OG shyt m8
A casual contemporary philosopher to read is Alain de Botton.
Mark Manson has some interesting blog posts. More of a self-help kind of vibe but still interesting and thought provoking
Rutger Bregman though I’ll get crucified here for saying that
What does he write about? Could probably just do a google search but you tell me.
Summary of his book:
-humans are fundamentally good, so we should just eliminate borders and give universal basic income to everyone and it'll be fine
Petty, envious academic, who's bad at his own discipline of choice and worse at everything else. A preacher of irresponsibility, simplistic visions and unearned arrogance.
I'd rank him n.1 among the worst frauds, followed by Yuval Harari and Steven Pinker.
Peter Linneman
Eric Kandel, Viktor Frankl
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Kandel
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viktor_Frankl
Lil Pump
I prefer Blueface.
Thotiana is that you?
Beat me to it
I really respect Sam Harris, despite some small disagreements - he has a very straightforward and analytical approach. I'd say I like Jordan Peterson but in recent months I really started to question how much of his talks are actually profound and introspective and how much of it is just empty words that leave you with the impression of having heard something profound. Furthermore - his inability to articulate his opinion on god seems like a copout. He won't go out and state objectively that he literally believes in a god, but he keeps saying that we have to "live with god" else fall to nihilistic and base impulses that lead to our downfall. I honestly get the impression that he's an atheist who essentially thinks that society should act as if god exists, without actually himself believing it at its core. It's almost like a part of his logic is that you have to truly think God is real, otherwise the psychological trick doesn't work, so he conveniently avoids answering the question directly, instead saying things to the effect of "god is order" or "god is virtue" or the classic "God is the peak of the human sociological dominance hierarchy" or some such psychoanalytic phrase.
David Chalmers is a really cool contemporary philosopher who has done a lot of interesting work regarding consciousness and was the first person to articulate the concept of the soft and "hard problem" of consciousness. He has a great conversation on the Lex Fridman podcast on YouTube.
Peterson has helped a lot of lost and hurt souls, you can just go on his videos and see people tell all about their lives in the comments, it’s actually beautiful. However, like I said above, he can be hard to follow at times, especially with the topic of God. I also think he doesn’t believe in an actual deity but more so the idea of a god and why it’s important for society. From what I gather, his disagreement with the atheist crowd comes from the fact that you can’t ground morality without a god, you can still be a good person, but you can’t build a civilization without some higher power - I think.
Yeah I definitely agree with you that he does have some pretty powerful ideas - even ones that are deceptively simple on the surface like "clean your room" and just the basic premise of taking responsibility and ownership for your life and being the steward of your own destiny. I think part of the reason he tends to appeal to a more conservative crowd at times, is that he is a very strong proponent of objective moral values, kind of like what you mentioned regarding needing a god to instill objective morality.
A lot of disenfranchised young men feel lost because the vapidness of social media and surface-level consumer culture can be pretty soul-crushing, so Jordan Peterson can definitely be seen as the minister or guiding father that a lot of young men in the modern world lack.
I respected JP a whole lot and still do, but with how he got so chronically addicted to benzos unknowingly was ridiculous to me. His entire profession was being this incredible psychologist that evidently doesnt realize the side effects of one of the most commonly prescribed drugs by psychologists
Yeah this is true. Not to mention, for someone who tells everyone to "clean their room" to better themselves, he doesn't seem to practice what he preaches...
Benzos are pretty light bro
.
Dude you don't need to copy and paste this everywhere.
ask me how I know
Rene Girard
Charlie Munger
Danny Kahneman and Amos Tversky as a duo. Separate them and nothing cool happens.
Michael Lewis & Walter Isaacson- Both these authors can make somewhat abstract ideas very consumable to the general public which is not an easy task.
Lil B
Nassim Taleb although he will have you questioning why the fuck you're in finance
Most of Taleb's work is laughed at by the statistics community, and it's pretty clear the finance community doesn't care much for him either
his shit's not like *about* finance or stats for the most part though. I lost like 80% of my respect for him when I found out how much time he spends arguing with people on twitter.
You know who DOESN'T think Taleb is an idiot?
Stephen Wolfram, one of the top 100 smartest people on the planet.
That's the issue with a lot of the posts in this thread. It's dominated by what I would consider pop intellectuals: Taleb, Sam Harris, Hitchens etc.
A more interesting list would be someting put together by actual intellectuals rather than folks like us trolling Youtube.
I like taleb a lot. I think the main thing I get from his is not his views on risk / stats / etc, but moreso on how humans have a hard time understanding these things. He does a really good articulating why we miss the point (in practical application / everyday decision making) in these areas.
Elon Musk. Once he starts speaking I am completely hypnotized.
Delete
He's not really a philosopher by any standard. Also he's an idiot.
Gad Saad
yeah I subbed to his YouTube recently
Charles Manson
Christopher Hitchens - though he died a few years ago.
Great man, such a command of the English language - really like no other. Reading his book Hitch22 at the moment, written just prior to his diagnosis. Great read thus far.
I was too young to know of Hitchens when he was alive and hated him when I was deeply religious, but over the last few years have come around to really admiring him.
Naval Ravikant
Nicholas Nassim Taleb
Not super modern, but Michel Foucault is a fantastic thinker/philosopher who is a bit out of the mainstream
He isn't mainstream? Foucault was one of the only modern philosophers I heard mentioned consistently in my college classes.
Well he basically birthed what eventually evolved into all the post-modernist bullshit that is causing problems today. So fuck Foucault.
His writings on the "Panopticon" are actually really eye opening / relevant today. Can't really speak to the rest of his stuff.
His writings on "Dropping anchor In poo bay" are divine.
Abella Danger, Riley Reid, and Belle Delphine
>Abella Danger, Riley Reid, and Belle Delphine
Sounds like you've been in isolation for a long time partner
Is Abella arguably modern?
OF thots extorting simps
JM Blakely
kai greene pre grapefruit incident
John McWhorter
Ayn Rand Sam Harris Jordan Peterson Christopher Hitchins Walter Williams Richard Dawkins Friedrich Hayek Ludwig von Mises Thomas Sowell
These are the ones that immediately come to mind.
Damn this is virtually identical to my list. It's such a shame that Hitch left us so soon, It'd be so interesting to hear his take on current events.
Paul Graham on Innovation and Entrepreneurship
Steve Bannon on Populism (dude was architecting 2020 a decade ago)
Anthony Bordain on Food and Culture
Used to like Bourdain, but after he killed himself, I didnt want to hear anymore of his dumb life musings
One of these is not like the others
Nassim Taleb 🦢
...
These are not categories. Just some arbitrary clusters I think make some sense:
1. People Who Brought Some Philosophy to Comedy: George Carlin, Richard Pryor, and Ricky Gervais.
2. People Who Brought Otherwise Complex Thoughts to Common Knowledge: Taleb, Yuval Noah Harari, and an Oncologist named Dr Siddhartha Mukherjee.
3. Philosophers, Logicians, and Linguists: Kurt Godel, Karl Popper, and Steven Pinker.
4. They Started an Important Chapter in Capitalism: Michael Milken, Jim Simons, Don Valentine, Charles Koch.
Feel free to disagree.
Charles Koch is a greedy robber-baron type. Michael Milken is a felon who has, perhaps, reformed more than his image.
I wouldn't entirely disagree with those descriptions but I would not put them in that manner. Milken did pave the way for the corporate raids and PE deals. And Koch kind of institutionalized private enterprise lobbying.
That's why I said I think they started a new chapter in capitalism. The chapter doesn't have to be good.
Whom would you put in the category?
Right on with Dr Siddhartha Mukherjee. It was so interesting to see him link the eugenics movement to advances in the science of genetics. Really opened my eyes to how science can be used to justify atrocities if not balanced with ethics and critical thinking
I've got quite into Douglas Murray, he wrote a book called "The Madness of Crowds" which I thought was excellent.
opinions on eric weinstein?
def lives in an academia echo chamber of libby garbage
def smart tho
but a lot of the shit he talks about is totally unverifiable and makes practically no sense
like how he's obsessed with the universe being one big spiral. like idk what to do with that bro
I haven’t watched enough of his stuff to make up my mind on the guy. I used to watch his podcast, “The Portal” but haven’t kept up much with him the last year.
Mixed feelings about him, but half of his tweets are impossible to understand. Just talk like a normal fucking person
Sowell, Taleb, Naval that have been mentioned are all excellent choices.
Let me add Yukio Mishima.
Sowell is a G.
oof good literature but the man was a nutso
For economic thought, Peter Schiff
broken clock
I also like James Altucher and Peter Thiel
Scott Alexander of Slate Star Codex is super interesting and not on the list so far. He writes about government, economics, science, and psychology (he is a practicing psychologist). Blog is on hiatus the last 6 months but should be picking up again this month!
Matt Levine (Bloomberg Opinion)
NYT Profile: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/08/business/matt-levine-bloomberg.html
I'm so happy he's back
Stephen wolfram
Yung Lean
I like Michael burry a lot. I might create a new Twitter account just to follow him again. Ahhh I miss Twitter ☹️
Not super new but Henri Bergson and Karl Popper. Stephen Fry is a refreshing voice and yeah, nice to have Matt Levine back, a finance troubadour par excellence
Kanye West.
Richard Koch. He is a big advocate of the 80/20 Principle, which has really helped me change my life to get better results by focusing on what matters. Highly recommend his books.
After exploring 'Essays in Quasi-Realism', I will go with Simon Blackburn.
Thich Nhat Hanh
Andrew Yang
Simon Blackburn
Elon Musk
Nancy Cartwright
Ratione aut corrupti labore vel. In nihil cupiditate ut autem aut et.
Omnis odio voluptatibus nesciunt id aut magni sit. Eum labore voluptatibus facilis quidem quis est et. Rerum sit eos qui ipsum eius nobis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Ut alias impedit error fugit. Eum quod ad similique occaecati omnis. Laborum ea alias dolorum a dolorem.
Commodi numquam est ut explicabo aut. Adipisci dolores enim quasi possimus laudantium ullam. Vero eum veritatis eum alias. Beatae veniam tempora quia expedita maxime unde.
Modi assumenda aut saepe. Cumque dicta minus quia aut vel. Expedita iusto dolores ducimus vel nostrum temporibus.
Hic officiis maxime maiores quidem dolorem. Vel nemo natus et voluptatibus facilis. Nesciunt autem minima et quis. Atque delectus qui sit quisquam tempore expedita quia temporibus. Doloremque architecto earum et perferendis. Animi provident rem at debitis blanditiis qui. Enim delectus ullam fugit.
Aut ea qui dolorem illo sed explicabo corporis. Odit modi aperiam vitae quisquam officiis. Molestiae dolorem recusandae aut ut animi rerum nam. Laudantium voluptates aut aut unde ipsum porro.
Harum ea ratione iure possimus neque sunt. Consequatur inventore molestiae rem voluptas ab ex voluptas. Porro sit qui vitae consequatur. Dolor minima voluptatem reiciendis.
Laudantium est iste eos dicta neque. Provident repellat eligendi ducimus adipisci quia. Ipsum et voluptatem est autem necessitatibus. Corrupti doloremque labore ipsum sunt.
Molestias vitae repellendus pariatur odio ex optio fugit. Est aut accusamus rerum libero quasi labore rem voluptatem. Ipsum et possimus rerum atque perspiciatis tempora consectetur dicta. Omnis corrupti est maiores fugiat.
Ad ut accusamus molestiae sed facere necessitatibus et. Minus qui molestiae nihil labore porro. Pariatur dolores in repudiandae aut sint placeat.
Debitis id quibusdam distinctio aperiam. Ut et quo voluptatum sunt quia. Tempore soluta quos et molestiae dolor culpa hic.
Nihil accusantium odio voluptatum omnis dolores. Non incidunt et consequatur at consequuntur accusamus aliquid. Eveniet illum sit incidunt.
Vero sunt voluptas minima consectetur libero voluptas. Earum laboriosam fugiat quia quidem sunt sed odit.
Rerum ut est alias eum. Saepe odio enim ab libero. Eos error et aut. Sint aliquid ipsam sunt voluptatem recusandae.
Distinctio ipsum ea ea architecto. Doloremque exercitationem dolor mollitia quas fuga sit deleniti praesentium. Facilis aut quia ut nemo vel rerum. Sed maxime alias quisquam velit. Inventore soluta soluta quas dolorem odit est sed.
Aut sit doloribus eos voluptatibus unde enim. Voluptatum sit voluptatem inventore soluta facilis voluptatum molestiae. Illum numquam tenetur debitis. Et provident deserunt aut consequatur est.
Quo assumenda nemo non laboriosam nobis totam. Non voluptatibus ullam ea voluptatum. Enim hic sit et ut. Aspernatur corporis quisquam a corrupti. Et dolorum aut autem sit non.
Beatae suscipit et voluptatibus. Vel voluptate illum temporibus non illum. Soluta rem ullam natus occaecati dolorem quaerat cum. Officiis omnis voluptatem optio est perferendis aut enim.