I Want to Learn About Distressed Debt Investing

I'm interested in learning about distressed corporate debt investing (like what Howard Marks does at Oaktree Capital).

Can anybody direct me to any resources that go over the process in identifying, analyzing, purchasing and profiting from such investments?

98 Comments
 

Moyer's book is fantastic, as stated previously.

Also check out Distressed-Debt-Investing.com which is a great resource for what's currently going on in the space along with some informative posts on different terms and example valuations.

If you have access to bloomberg I suggest looking at Bill Rochelle's daily distressed memo which has a couple paragraphs for a handful of the current bankruptcies going on.

Also as a side note Alpha Masters has an interesting profiles on Marc Lasry of Avenue Group that I think is worth checking out, shows how they built their business around distressed debt.

Let me know if you find anything else, I'm always interested in new stuff about distressed debt.

 

www.distresseddebtinvestorsclub.com/ - you can get embargoed access to the investment ideas with the free account

Also discovered this gem - www.lcdcreditmarketnews.com/na/2012/10/ Not sure if its always free to get without an account, but I like reading the LCD Daily Wrap. It has also come in useful a few times for finding trading levels of less liquid term loans, etc.

 
idkmybffjillCheck out Distressed Investing by Marty Whitman.

Having read both Moyer and Whitman's books, I believe you should start with Moyer. They cover many of the same subjects, and it will be hard to force yourself through the second book when it feels like you are just re-reading the same material.

Array
 

Anybody read the chess moves in moyer? I was visualizing but it seems 8. d5 is impossible. I played it out and there is ambiguity about 6. xc3 (bxc3 or dxc3) but either way its impossible.

Full sequence to that point is 1, c4, e6 2. Nc3, Bb4 3. Nf3, c5 4. e3, Nc6 5. Bd3, Bxc3 6.[b or d]xc3, d6 7. e4, e5 8. d5

 

Curious as well.

I have http://www.Amazon.com/Leveraged-Financial-Markets-Comprehensive-Instruments/dp/0071746684/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1319030347&sr=8-1 on my Amazon wish list which I thought sounded relevant but I'm far from an expert in the space.

Also, per kraken's comment check out the distressed debt investing blog.

 

S&P LCD has good, free primers on High Yield and Lev Loans.

Like Unforseen said, Fabozzi is good. The Handbook of Fixed Income Securities doesn't go into too much depth on High Yield though. If you are interested, amazon has it in kindle format for cheap.

http://www.amazon.com/Corporate-Financial-Distress-Bankruptcy-Distresse…

is very good, but dry as hell. It's like Fabozzi in that respect. Most people would just use it as a reference, but it might help.

 

search bar, use it.

"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper
 

Distressed PE and distressed HF could have very different play - you could be at a PE fund looking for control or providing rescue financing, or you could be at a vulture fund that grasp the spread from distressed/stressed credits (like from 85 to 93 in 3 weeks are pretty awesome for HF). They way you conduct research would be similar: understanding the business/fiancials/cap structure, where is the problem etc, but the play when you put down capital is very different.

Moyer's distressed debt analysis is a good book to start, distressed-debt-investing.com is also a good place to read.

 

I say that b/c before any real distressed investment, a buysider would go through every credit doc thoroughly and ensure they aren't getting screwed over aka making sure the document is "perfected" to what they have claims to. Then, they would buy/short different things in the capital structure based on their interpretation.

A perfect example is the Sabine/Forest Oil merger where there is a huge dispute between the change of control provisions aka some guys who bought in at 80c thinking the bonds would go to 105 when they get taken out are now sitting on bonds worth under 30c. Definitely an interesting situation...

 
Eatmarkers

I say that b/c before any real distressed investment, a buysider would go through every credit doc thoroughly and ensure they aren't getting screwed over aka making sure the document is "perfected" to what they have claims to. Then, they would buy/short different things in the capital structure based on their interpretation.

A perfect example is the Sabine/Forest Oil merger where there is a huge dispute between the change of control provisions aka some guys who bought in at 80c thinking the bonds would go to 105 when they get taken out are now sitting on bonds worth under 30c. Definitely an interesting situation...

Hey thanks for this! I was wondering do you work in distressed debt?

 

Conceptual Overview: http://www.cravath.com/files/Uploads/Documents/Publications/3234772_1.P… Entry Level: Stephen Moyer's Distressed Debt Analysis Advanced (definitely worth it if you have a grasp on the basics): The Art of Distressed M&A: Buying, Selling, and Financing Troubled Companies

both books are worth the money, although i felt Moyer's book didn't delve into any of the case law and was too high-level to gain a deeper understand as to why individual legal concepts are important in the context of a bankruptcy

Vertical Farming Extraordinare
 

My understanding of the Sabine / Forest merger is not that the language in the credit docs was particularly weak, but rather that the structure of the transaction was changed so that it would work AROUND the Change of Control... which I guess you could say means that the guy who bought at 80c didn't read carefully enough, or you could say that a transaction structure that gives 51%+ economic interest but only 49% voting interest just to avoid triggering a Change of Control is an unusual structure that very few people anticipated.

In any case, Whitman's "Distress Investing" is supposed to be fairly good too - disclaimer: I'm reading through now, haven't gotten very far yet, but have gotten strong reviews from others.

 

You would owe Lucille 1.5 million if you allowed her interest to compound. Subsequently, the preferred equity, Linsay and Gob's split would go down proportionally.

The only other thing you need to keep in mind is that to setup this kind of structure (A/B/Mezz/Preferred Equity/Equity), the documents of the A have to allow for it. Many senior lenders prohibit subordinate financing unless they approve it (especially Mezz). So they may not allow Michael and Lucille to become part of the structure (or at least record their lein against the property/borrowing entity).

Proceeding with this structure without without the A's permission (BSB), is generally considered an EOD and can trigger the recourse carve out language.

 

Good point that Senior Loans have to allow for each additional layer. Not many banks would allow this, but it's easier to fit all of them in one post.

In this example Lucille's mezzanine was structured as debt unless there was a default, and I didn't want to list out of the different ways Gob could have defaulted. Short version is that there was no conversion to equity.

I don't follow your math for Lucille's final balance. 15% per year, compounded annually, would look like:

Year 1 Beginning of Period (BOP): $1.00 MM Interest: $0.150 MM End of Period (EOP): $1.15 MM

Year 2 BOP: $1.15 MM Interest: $0.173 MM EOP: $1.32 MM

Year 3 BOP: $1.32 MM Interest: $0.20 MM EOP: $1.52 MM

Year 4 BOP: $1.52 MM Interest: $0.23 MM EOP: $1.75 MM

Year 5 BOP: $1.75 MM Interest: $0.26 MM EOP: $2.01 MM

Fill the unforgiving minute with 60 seconds of run. - Kipling
 

Great post, just think its misleading to call Michael's loan an A note. First of all, it isn't clear what his note is secured by, if anything? It seems to me that it's an unsecured loan...

If BSB originated the whole loan and split it up, it would be a A-Note of 9M and a B-Note 2M. If Michael's loan was secured by the property, it would be a second mortgage. If it was secured by the SPE borrower's interests, it would be a mezzanine loan. From the example above it seems like an unsecured loan, with recourse directly to Gob.

 

Good point, for this example I was thinking it was secured against the property, so a B-note that is subordinate to the $9M loan from BSB

Fill the unforgiving minute with 60 seconds of run. - Kipling
 

I suggest you read the book the previous poster recommended. It will give you a very good intro.

The Macro View http://themacroview.wordpress.com
 

drexelalum11, themacroguy,

Thanks for the links. I would appreciate any other reading material suggestions you might have for me.

 

lcd = S&P Leveraged Commentary & Data (lcdcomps.com). it's a site that publishes news on leveraged loan and high yield transactions (and related restructuring and distressed situations).

mca2k4Anyone know what the "LCD" that brenai referred to stands for?
 

-Quantitative requirements: not really -Differences from IG: completely different; do your homework before posting -Algo trading: this is the most qualitative product on the street, are you kidding -EM distressed is as illiquid as they come; most distressed traders stay away though because of ill-defined bankruptcy laws

 

From what I've heard, it seems to be a good area right now,and a good up and coming area

Hopefully someone else can expand this discussion to distressed funds

 

at a sell side bank there is distressed research (generally dont publish- help support trading desk/come up w prop ideas), distressed traders and distressed salesmen

lot less flow than a HG or HY desk, still market making but a lot of prop/fundamental analysis

great place to be right now IMO as the market is certainly entering a recession/distressed cycle

bonuses really depend on the year/performance, cant generalize

if you have the opportunity to work on a sell side distressed desk/buy side distressed fund, jump at it

im sure some of the HF guys can provide more color

 
HedgeKing

On the career side, is this the time to get into this area? Or is it already building up a large pool of such talents, which down the road may result in large scale layoffs at some point, just like the MBS a few years ago?

do you find it interesting, fascinating even? if yes, then it's always a good time to get into it, otherwise, try something you do find fascinating.
"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper
 

This "phenomena" you describe is really nothing new. It isn't a long term trend or a fad, distress investing is cyclical. We are at a point in the cycle where there are a number of distressed cases. This isn't something that you just gravitate towards because you heard about it on WSO...plenty of Value-oriented shops/distressed-focused have already been playing in the "distressed world." Shops are not opening up by the thousand to capitalize on this new world of distress investing as your post seems to imply.

 

My recommendations are more useful for the sub-investment grade leveraged loan market rather than investment grade. Do you know if you're applying for a job at rating investment grade or leveraged loans/high yield?

Those who can, do. Those who can't, post threads about how to do it on WSO.
 

There are a good number of LBOs in the consumer goods sector as well. In any case, a lot of the concepts in the leveraged loan/high yield space are not significantly different to the investment grade space.

I recommend you read through the Loan Market Guide on the LCD website.

Those who can, do. Those who can't, post threads about how to do it on WSO.
 

IG bonds. Probably going to want to know market pricing, whats being issues, different types of bonds, etc. LCD is a great resource. I believe it is Moody's or S&P which does a weekly market update and talks about what they are seeing in the market.

I'd probably pull a 10k and look at the capital structure and get an idea of how it looks, maturity cliffs companies face, stuff like that.

 

You should be ready to explain why pikachu is a superior choice for starting pokemon over squirtle.

Follow the shit your fellow monkeys say @shitWSOsays Life is hard, it's even harder when you're stupid - John Wayne
 
mrdraper

Hi all,

I've researched quite a bit on distressed investing on the forum and elsewhere, but have a few questions that I would like to clarify:

1. With equity investing it seems that it is much more possible to move from the private side (PE) to the public side (L/S Equity) but not vice-versa, is the same true for distressed or is it more flexible there? As a follow-on, would RX experience be a good background for both private and public debt sides and HY Research would rather (only) help with public debt funds?
2. How important would you say is to show personal investments in the HY/Distressed space in order to have a better change of getting into a distressed fund?
3. Would it be possible to move from distressed investing to deep value equity fund? (just wondering)

I hope this is also useful to some other people interested in distressed investing.
My background is M&A in Continental Europe (Tier 2 bank) and ideally would end up on the buy-side in the distressed space.

Thank you.

  1. Not sure I really understand the question as distressed investing (in practice) necessarily involves a mix of public and private situations/information. But if you're asking whether one can move from distressed to purely public HY or equity investing, yes.

  2. Minimal to no importance, and nobody would expect you to have any personal investments in distressed assets (unless they were healthy before you bought them, but that wouldn't be good for you). Distressed is not a game for private investors unless they are ultra, ultra-high net worth (ie family offices like Icahn) -- it requires a very large amount of resources to do properly since you need to be able to try and influence outcomes if things aren't going your way. (Moreover, unless you are a QIB you will not even have access to most situations.) All that said, you should know what is going on in the market enough to speak somewhat intelligently about at least a couple names if they come up.

  3. Yes, they are not very different in terms of framing an investment, in my opinion.

 

In my op I think distressed investing is the ultimate form or an extreme form of value investing. It's a very long-term, methodological investment thesis that could take many months to years to play out. There's a lot of due diligence and understanding of legal framework. Understanding the key players and motives of each creditor group is EXTREMELY important. There is some game theory elements in any super distressed asset.

In my op, the work may not always been as exciting, but there is a lot of analysis. Not exciting is referring to reading credit/legal documents. It's an interesting space to look into though. Not for the faint-hearted.

 

You should probably ask if the fund is loan-to-own vulture fund or a more timid distressed player as well. Different distressed funds have different strategies and investment processes. I'm actually surprised there hasn't been a huge inflow of DIP financing distressed players given that many of the banks are exiting the space due to regulation.

 

My friend just went from Goldman to Silver Point Capital. They're a solid shop that invests in distressed debt in order to convert to equity. It's cool beacuse it's like a hedge fund and a PE shop in one.

 

In follow up to my earlier posting re: Distressed debit investing through buying pre-foreclosure notes through auction. Has anyone been engaged in this activity. Check out www.RealtyNoteBid.com and let me know your thoughts…has anyone used them. Do you have any other resources / info that might help in my understanding this investment channel.

propinvest007
 

Seems like mostly single family, not too many listings. How new is it?

AL (1) AZ (1) CA (7) FL (2) GA (3) IL (1) IN (3) MI (2) OH (4)

I recently worked a little bit on pre packaged CRE bankruptcy/foreclosure. Assuming there is only 1 lender and developer borrower, you will want to have both the borrower and lender willing to go with your plan, unless you want to factor in up to 2 years of delay. Borrowers can be a bitch if they want to drag it out in court, if they declare personal bankruptcy, then everything freezes... if they want to counter sue the lender for whatever.... long story short, getting your hands on a property can take many times as long as just buying the note. Lots of lenders/investors pay borrowers to go away. Ironically because borrowers can cause so much delay, sometimes i think the go away money is more than their original equity (hypothetical: borrower put up 1mm to take out 30mm loan, now gets 2mm to go away). The loser then becomes the lender(and the lender's investors) when they write a loan down to 40% original value. But if a lender needs the money to keep a CDO floating, then they dont have a choice but to mark it down. Also while borrower/lender/investors fight it out in the court, properties are usually not maintained, if there is a leaky pipe somewhere, and you get the property a few months later, that can be tons of damage. Unfortunally for any big deals, there are usually multiple lenders, if the lenders can't agree, then you wont ever get a deal going.

To build a model probablly takes a few hours, but there is always lots of uncertainty. Dont buy something pre foreclosure unless you are sure you can get the property within your timeline.

 

Et et magnam ut et. Rerum odit aut neque non voluptatem dignissimos ipsam. Repellendus omnis officiis blanditiis et ea iure. Molestiae qui odio totam vel mollitia harum aut veritatis. Iste nulla quis qui.

Dolore quasi accusantium soluta autem rerum. Eos voluptatem provident quia sit. Odio dolor nihil placeat perspiciatis qui. Et harum eos et velit quia. Delectus vitae aut praesentium earum et. Dolor consectetur molestias aspernatur et vero.

I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.
 

Nam possimus natus numquam et a. Voluptate et consequatur earum est sit. Modi enim soluta quasi ut ducimus vitae quas. Sed nisi rerum dolorem nemo ea. Iure quod ut impedit incidunt eos amet.

Officia iusto repellat ut sint eligendi ea. Vel quo rerum modi occaecati est cumque rerum dolores. Ipsa dolore assumenda in deleniti et neque. Quis debitis ipsam magni consectetur alias incidunt.

Molestias quia eius dignissimos enim. Officia omnis consequuntur reprehenderit. Ratione ad optio dolorum eos.

Soluta occaecati occaecati nostrum neque cum. Hic delectus assumenda ipsum suscipit ullam sapiente. Enim qui mollitia quo itaque sapiente itaque autem. Est quasi rerum eos vero autem non ea.

 

Sapiente nihil repellendus ullam enim et eum labore natus. Maiores asperiores voluptatibus minima reprehenderit nisi alias veritatis. Similique dolorem molestiae sit eum et occaecati. Esse provident animi vel.

Nostrum eligendi unde quod ut nam eveniet saepe nemo. Dolorum voluptatem ipsam temporibus et. Voluptas quia aut cum possimus ullam tempore quam. Adipisci non laudantium rerum velit necessitatibus perferendis.

I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.
 

Cum aut cum aut corporis provident. Qui dolorum exercitationem officiis voluptatem voluptatem. Dolores eos voluptatem blanditiis ut molestias esse.

Et sint expedita velit et laboriosam officiis. Impedit officiis est excepturi impedit corrupti laboriosam et. Aut et animi officiis ut iusto sed placeat.

Ut ut aut qui quia. Quasi ratione rerum repellendus dolore libero. Nobis velit dolore et suscipit qui qui expedita. Aut magnam adipisci non dolor. Quis totam aut accusamus veritatis dicta doloribus cumque.

 

Deserunt cum in nemo quibusdam assumenda dolores quod. Labore qui dolores voluptate dolor odit eius consectetur. Qui consequatur occaecati nesciunt eveniet.

Nesciunt laborum necessitatibus culpa officiis. Et voluptatem et quia ullam. Ut eius veniam cum voluptatem. Sunt et officia recusandae. Sit deleniti repellat officia eos nam illum repellat.

Minus quae officia voluptatibus. Fugit dolores commodi harum deserunt. Dolores aspernatur totam ea iusto commodi. Enim saepe non ipsum laudantium possimus dignissimos.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • Millennium Partners 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Blackstone Group 96.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.1%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.2%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.3%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $192
  • Analysts (240) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (28) $146
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”