Oncycle is a fucking joke

It’s 2am, and recruiters are still cold calling with a “are you free? fund x wants to hop on the phone ASAP” and getting emails with “MODELING TEST TONIGHT”

who the fuck thinks this is a good way to recruit talent? absolute joke

update: got an MF offer on day 3, absolutely exhausted. i stand by my points above.

Mod Note: Here are some more PE recruiting related discussions:

Heard on-cycle kicked off last night

2022 on-cycle kicked off

List of on-cycle firms interviewing

on-cycle backup plan

 

It's wack, but lowkey I love this shit. It's kind of a rush/high pressure, and I prefer that over some long, drawn-out process 

 

Hasn't it always been like that though? That was my expectation about on-cycle at least. Only those who want it really bad and are well prepared will have a good outcome

 

look up which HH your target fund use and reach out to them directly & lay out your preferences and profile out right. Top funds always get the head start and rest pick up from there. Better be proactive now if you want to recruit for MF but haven’t gotten intro yet

 

Can confirm - friends received 11pm / midnight emails to interview. Obviously on-cycle is always chaotic, but this year just seems like an absolute disaster given the virtual nature + the fact HHs have had literally only 3-4 days to meet candidates.

Anyone who's been interviewing want to opine on how their process has been going so far? Seems like most A2's will just gun for 2022 off-cycle. 

 

That's pretty crazy but it also makes a little sense. When I was an analyst, I was available every night at 11 p.m.except for maybe the weekend.  Also, a little easier to slip out at that time of night.

Also another side thought, if you're bothered by a PE fund that does calls at 2 a.m., then it sounds like you don't need the interview.  You don't want to work at that fund. If this is how it starts, the job is probably going to be much much worse.

 

Not sure how what you're saying is relevant. Point isn't that interviewing late at night is surprising or an issue. Everyone expects that lol.

It's that the process has been a mess largely due to HHs having literally 3 days to meet people (i.e. headhunter meetings were last Tuesday-Friday, and TB kicked off on-cycle on 9/11), whereas typically there's ~3 weeks from outreach to kick-off. 

 

Some of that does sound pretty crazy but honestly that's the job market.  People are not here to kiss your ass. Have not received 2 a.m calls but in the regular job market, plenty of stuff like, "Hey can you come in for an interview tomorrow at 10 a.m."

I sometimes wonder if PE recruitment is really as crazy as people say it is on WSO or whether they are encountoring a real job market process for the first time in their life?

Note on campus recruitment is not real life as far as how recruitment goes...so some of this may be a shock to those that have never done it.

 

On cycle recruiting is one of few accurate things on WSO. It is a shit show for both the candidates and firms. I work at one of the MFs and we literally had people running around interviewing all night with limited sleep. 

 

On cycle has been a shitshow since way back. Interview notifications past 11pm and final rounds stretching to 2-3am have always been pretty common (at least since 2010ish when the cycle starting pushing way up). What’s different / worse this year is that zoom allows people to interview that night vs. having the decency to wait until 7am. 

 
Most Helpful

If they are interviewing people at midnight, that's a big red flag for culture and work life balance.

Imagine trying to interview a top quant or software engineer at 2am.  They would tell you to phuck off and basically get the firm blackballed on levels/blind/glassdoor.  Goodbye engineering talent going forward.

Finance is full of huge cucks to put up with this. 

 

Is it to early to exit after 1,5 years in your opinion to middle sized PE firms? (I’m terms of probability, HH reaching out, possibilities etc.). I am totally exhausted after 1 year and 2 months and would like to exit ASAP to a smaller PE firm with good hours.

Work at a BB in the Nordics at the moment and graduated from European target.

Thanks a lot!

/A2

 

Thank god the person above said it. Like there’s just no way you have someone interview at 2am if you respect juniors. Furthermore, you likely also aren’t trying to recruit critical thinkers if that’s your approach—you just want hardos that will grind. Software engineers or quants at hedge funds wouldn’t put up with this they’d just go somewhere else—but the insecurity mixed with prestige has kids so lost in the sauce they will do anything.

 

Everyone gets the rationale—you only get the hardos who are willing to put up with that bullshit and make a decision on little information/ without talking to other firms. It’s the exact same rationale for reaching out to banking candidates as sophomores in college. Anecdotally, I don’t think it actually gets better candidates from looking at where my friends ended up and the dipshits I know at megafunds, but hey maybe you are right.

 

As a dipshit going to a MF, this is pretty true. Id consider myself a grinder / bit of a hardo, which is why im in this industry in the first place and got locked into it due to sophomore year recruiting, but my really intelligent friends from college went to academia/quant/startups. You dont gotta be smart to do pe/consulting/swe at the entry level tbh, but that’s good for people like me lol

 

At an EB, when I got my internship offer (Fall 2018, I recruited late) I also had offers on the table from Google, Facebook, Microsoft, and Amazon slinging code (didn't think I was going to get into banking) ... pay was more, hours were less and I still choose the EB. Is something wrong with my head?

 

Bro honestly you dont gotta be smart to code. I think it seems difficult for someone who hasnt learned it because it’s not as intuitive, but if you ever take an intro CS class, it’s not that hard. And for interviewing, there’s a cracking the coding interview guide thats like their version of the M&I.

 

Shit, maybe im actually smart then? Or dumb for not going into tech 

 

Think about the number of MD seats there are relative to analysts and think about why on a risk / probability-adjusted basis, tech is pretty much even with finance in terms of comp. 

Sure, finance might earn more at the mid-upper level (MD / senior management), but escaping the analyst bottleneck is much more difficult than tech, where you can basically lounge until L5 ($500k comp). Comparatively, making VP in IB is much more difficult and has greater risk of burnout. 

After that, founders make significantly more in tech than finance. There's a reason the billionaire list is dominated by tech. Finance wealth also takes way longer to build (consider Steve Schwarzman, one of the most successful people in finance - not only he is worth a fraction of Bezos / Zuck / Musk, but it took him decades longer to get there). 

 

or they could......offer something else to candidates other than being first to talk to them at 3am.....

like....oh i dont know, respect for their time, a great culture, decent WLB

thats what software companies do, and they pay their people 500k plus easily.....there so much demand for talent they HAVE to

 

This $500k easy like for SWEs is getting a bit out of hand.

it is not easy to make $500k. That’s deep into L6 territory and only ~30% of Sr SWEs ever make L6 and they’re like ~10-12% of the engineering population. Please stop spouting nonsense. 

 
Analyst 2 in IB - Cov

It's 2am, and recruiters are still cold calling with a "are you free? fund x wants to hop on the phone ASAP" and getting emails with "MODELING TEST TONIGHT"

who the fuck thinks this is a good way to recruit talent? absolute joke

Maybe, it weeds out people not willing to work until 2 a.m and do all kinds ridiculous stupid requests ASAP.  If the recruitment bothers you, it sounds like you shouldn't work there.....

Do you think the recruitment process is the worst part and then it'll all be easy after that? This screwed up process sounds like a harbinger of things to come if you accept to job. You probably don't want to work for these guys.

 

Exactly. If this fucked up process deters my competition from interviewing/accepting an offer there, that’s good for me 

 

Same boat, pulled nearly an all nighter the first night it on-cycle kicked off but gave up. Got too much work to catch up on already at my ACTUAL job.

 

It's a broken system. At a UMM fund that filled ~50% of its incoming class - we don't do exploding offers or 2 AM interviews but the process could have been managed so much more effectively. There are still a few hundred kids who haven't met with CPI yet so we aren't in any rush to fill our class at the moment. Based on what I've heard from friends at other UMM funds, a lot of them are also holding a significant portion of their classes vacant so I wouldn't lose hope.

I personally know of kids who went off market with offers at MFs on Day 1 who are ridiculously awful analysts. Many of these firms are cutting modeling tests / skimping on interviews and/or hiring based on pedigree and I can tell you many of them will be in for a rude awakening pretty soon.

 

These are analysts who just started in July? What is there to interview about, July was Series exams, August was training...It's been less than a month...Or are these 2nd year analysts 

 

Bc you have to relearn all the ropes, are at the bottom again vs in staying in banking, you have more experience, can game the system, and can shove work down / push back on bullshit where you can’t as a first year in PE with brutal hours. Corporate has easy hours and some smaller hedges have a collegial vibe 

 

Anyone else feel like they've been getting dinged from interviews for no apparent reason? I totally get how competitive these roles are, but I'm struggling to make sense of this process. I've even had a few where the interviewers literally said "great job on the technicals" or "I think you'd be a great fit here" and then get dinged for the following round. Kinda discouraging given the lack of feedback we get 

 

I think reality is just not trying to read into anything. I had an interview with one place where they would give me a very generic “we’ll contact you via HH” and then push me forward. Had another where they were very friendly and complimentary of my case study and investment write-up and then I just never heard back. These people have done this a million times and are good at not showing their cards.

 

That’s because, though nobody will admit it, the recruiting process is a circle jerk of “top candidates” who aren’t actually top candidates at all.

Ever notice how the “top candidates” for IB on paper or through interviews often aren’t top bucket? It’s almost like, intangibles like grit, work ethic, and EQ matter (shocker, I know). You can’t test for that well in an interview process, let alone a 48h one. Thus was created the illusion of “top candidates” since no firm is willing to admit that hiring for PE is a total fucking crapshoot.

 

Sed ipsum expedita nulla perspiciatis. Architecto aut in libero dolor. Quia eligendi voluptas ipsum eum. Est autem non ullam molestiae alias. Animi et numquam eveniet et voluptas et.

Fugit et excepturi vitae sit impedit corrupti nobis. Occaecati aspernatur omnis repudiandae et porro. Enim accusantium dolore nobis vero quas. Ad ut ipsam unde. Voluptatem qui aut provident. Dicta dolore nesciunt possimus cumque.

Veniam quo voluptatibus accusantium quasi assumenda. Incidunt qui modi distinctio voluptatibus.

 

Quisquam iste aut quisquam sequi voluptas occaecati amet. Voluptatum consectetur modi adipisci maiores fugiat delectus nisi rerum. Quia cum iusto earum consequatur quia officia. A vel qui id accusantium. Blanditiis molestiae tenetur porro voluptatem illo explicabo. Quis et sunt vitae velit quo sint.

 

Magni dolores voluptatem nihil ut animi. Officia nihil assumenda omnis at eaque impedit numquam. Quis accusamus quisquam dicta expedita dolorem quis. Facere perspiciatis quas rerum consequatur sapiente aut saepe. Non ipsa laboriosam dolorum qui soluta quia. Quia sed odio fuga deleniti modi nobis. Ut labore mollitia quasi magnam. Minus voluptatum aut dolor atque ea.

 

Et illum ducimus et sed animi quia. Error accusamus non explicabo cum voluptatem enim.

Voluptatibus qui facilis eum tempore est. Ut architecto dolores fuga necessitatibus iusto sapiente. Consequatur nemo sed assumenda et.

Deleniti inventore eos adipisci dicta vero dolor fugiat eos. Vel sit incidunt et fugiat. Voluptatum deleniti blanditiis nulla est qui et nulla. Magnam reprehenderit optio rerum est sunt consequuntur voluptates magni. Vero voluptatum consectetur nobis dignissimos sit quo. Sunt est voluptatem assumenda. Labore in aut mollitia sunt. Repudiandae soluta deserunt quia adipisci.

Sed qui dolores ut amet praesentium. Eligendi aliquid reprehenderit quas quae. Voluptates ut consequuntur dolores sed aut velit consequatur. Consectetur laboriosam eos consequatur tempora saepe odit et ipsa. Esse quaerat quae dicta temporibus in mollitia. Quia qui architecto rem ab ab ea.

 

Eius voluptatem quos enim in. Ut aliquam consequatur quasi ex veniam. Et quaerat illo dolorem voluptatem consequatur ad sunt. Nihil nihil voluptas eaque placeat sed praesentium sint. Laboriosam officia totam maxime corporis enim.

Deserunt sint sit quo sed asperiores tenetur dolore. Ducimus possimus ea aut sint optio.

Molestiae accusamus facilis nobis sit repellat sit nobis. Quis soluta sunt temporibus similique. Aut omnis quis quos atque enim. Voluptas quo ad omnis sequi. Reiciendis impedit maiores tempora numquam consequatur sit a. Culpa sequi fuga nisi facere esse suscipit.

WSO Content & Social Media. Follow us: Linkedin, IG, Facebook, Twitter.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $266
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”