PWP - 65% Return Rate???
Hello all,
Incoming SA at PWP here, go to a top target and chose PWP over Moelis/Citi. I had assumed they all had similar offer rates and was basing it off culture but this cycle was not the case. Another user who worked at PWP said PWP had 65% return rates, feel like that's ridiculously low for EB and even BB. Heard through a first-year analyst that some groups were as low as 50%. Does anybody know what's going on? In the interview process, everyone talked about 95%+ return rates? Especially with them growing so rapidly and already very lean. Should I be worried, and will this continue next year?
Curious too
bump
Bump as well
also interested if people think this justifying reneging if I have a JPM offer?
if they lied to your face and said 95%+ (which is way more believable than 65%) then you can definitely reneg imo. I would try to verify that this info is correct, if it is then fuck them. Thats like if you lied on your resume and said you have a 3.5 when you really have a 2.5. They would definitely reneg on you.
While I think it’s fair to renege because of that, couldn’t it still land you in trouble if the other bank finds out?
Worth it
I wouldn’t be too worried about that. My group had a ~70% offer rate but the people who didn’t get offers did pretty egregious things. The bar for interns is shockingly low so just make sure you look for feedback and improve as much as you can.
are you a second year at PWP?
3/10 interns are doing egregious things? the fuck are they hiring lol
feel like at a BB with that many people there's bound to be a few who do dumb stuff
judging by your post history no way you work at PWP
I don’t, at a BB
What egregious things did they do?
Can't touch on @banking_bart's experiences, but since 2020 was online SAs and hybrid/fully remote in many cases in 2021, you can put not being online during working hours on top of the list.
Having done an SA and having met the other 60 kids in my SA class, you'd be surprised how unprofessional a lot of interns act by showing up late, being underdressed, etc. A lot of kids seem to forget that college is a completely different ballgame than the workplace.
Definitely considering reneging at this point, EB's shouldn't have 65% return rates
same here
It is nowhere near 65%, it is easily like 90%. They are growing immensely and will continue to hire more and more
Agree that this is very concerning
Hate how firms can lie on their statements like this
Also crazy how many FTs they are taking, would love some insight from a PWP employee on what's going on, or I think there will be a lot of reneging judging by this thread.
Pretty sure they underhired during last summer's recruiting cycle due to uncertainy/covid which they must be correcting for. Wouldn't be too worried as they're growing and return rates are high every year prior. Would love a bit more color from someone at the firm tho
Bump
Really hope PWP takes notice that incoming SA are uncomfortable given the offer rate in a booming M&A market and at least tries to address why.
Agreed this is the quote from a PWP associate, "return rate was about 65% this year, not sure why so low but maybe they found candidates they liked during FT" Why would you favor FTs over interns, I'm 100% sure 35% of the interns were not incompetent...
I suppose a possibility was that a lot of those FTs were strong candidates and did their SAs at top BBs and other EBs and looked to trade up. At the end of the day this definitely sucks man, and is definitely super unusual considering PWP's historical return rates have been 85%+.
It's sort of the problem when looking at a small class size, no? Let's say 21% no returns, given 15/19 as stated below in this thread (latest number). That sounds scary as a percentage, but with a class size of 19, it's not too far-fetched that in an off-year 4 interns aren't gonna be what they were looking for in terms of culture, competency, work ethic, etc. To be fair, I feel like competence isn't the right metric here. My vibe with EB's is that they always hire really smart kids, but those that don't get returns usually weren't a cultural fit/didn't act properly in the work environment. But probably best just to reach out to other juniors at the firm and get the rundown
.
Anyone know what groups got hit the hardest? And for other incoming SA, what is the plan for you all now? CVP is the only half decent bank that'll still be recruiting and I haven't touched a technical since the spring
going to talk to some banks I got offers with and said "no" to see if they have capacity, I know JPM/Citi/CS/Lazard still do
My contacts at these firms feel confident if I talk to HR they can get me in
Sounds good, I'll start doing the same tbh. Have a few really strong contacts at comparable firms so I'll try that. Not like they'll miss us anyways since they enjoy hiring 10+ people full time each year
CVP is pretty much done recruiting
Bump
.
Following
look at 2021 PWP SA return rate thread
.
Hopefully someone at the firm can provide more color
yes that was the entire point of this thread just want some more info as this is really strange for them
Really hope someone says something soon. This was totally unexpected
Does anybody think HR reads these??
yes, can confirm they usually do
Nice try HR
Isn’t one of the supposed benefits of signing with an EB the higher return rate?
ya they had 90% offer rate for the past few years so this is kinda nutrs
.
Do people know if 65 is true or just from that one comment on the thread
assuming its accurate given the person worked for PWP, a first-year analyst also estimated it to be sub 70% so I have to believe its correct.
Ik Jefferies last summer only gave 50% and this summer gave 95% but we were also in a global pandemic last summer.. whereas this summer IB revenue was at an ATH
Just an FYI, Jefferies did not give out 50% offer rates. It gave 95%, just waited 20 or so days because they had a hiring freeze in place. This year it was pretty much 100% for most groups and Jefferies is looking to hire FT folks as well.
Wow chose them over Citi? Did you not like the group at Citi or something?
I'd choose PWP over Citi...
That’s consistent with the other intern viewpoints, but as someone whose been in banking for 10+ years, we always give preference to people who have the bulge experience.
Also, take a look at this thread. Interns whining about a random acceptance rate and thinking of reneging lol.
How about you have some self confidence and say to yourself I don’t care what the return rate / offer rate is for interns, I’m going to work hard and get a return offer. Why do you young people always look for the easiest road and freak out that one bank pays 10k higher base?
I choose a low EB for rx (Gugg/GHL) over Citi and I will try to explain my rationale:
-I know the group I will work with and I don't have to go through group placement
-I will be a generalist while I could get placed in a random coverage group I don't like at Citi since I don't have anyone who's pulling for me at Citi
-my Citi SD was so simple, extremely basic technicals (note I am not diversity) and the interviewers were not even trying to fake enthusiasm for being there
-I think the average kid in my class will be more technical compared to the average kid at Citi, with such simple interviews for non diversity I can imagine that it is quite hard for Citi to screen candidates (not sure about the point you make about EB looking for fit while they have arguably tougher interviews)
-I will work on smaller teams and will get more exposure to clients sooner compared to Citi - not sure how stimulating it is to be on a deal with a bunch of other analysts
I am yet to be a SA so I welcome any advice or comments about my choice/thinking
Totally agree on taking PWP over Citi
Your situation seems to be very specific, and its rare for a young person to have so many advocates like you do. As anything in life, nothing is black and white, so in your case going to a small bank might be the best.
You're anecdotal experience interviewing at citi really has no bearing though. You had a bad interview experience, so you think that would be the case for everyone?
Finally, I was giving general advice, as in generally as a complete banking fledgling the name helps alot. You learn the same models whether you're at Goldman or William Blair. Right? Anyone can learn to create a merger model. But I like to hire someone I know was able to interview and get into Goldman, was able to succeed in an intense environment and work on / lead interesting deals. There maybe a superstar at Blair and of course you can always alter your destiny at any point in life, but most people would like to speak to the Goldman candidate no matter what.
Not sure what I am saying is so controversial. There are called bulge brackets for a reason. It's like saying I chose to go to Duke over Princeton because I liked the fit better. That's fine and its not like you're ruining your life at Duke, but the Princeton name can land you some interviews no matter what.
What do FT people think about it?
NYC RO rate was ~80%. In past it has been higher but this class was less impressive, not sure why. May be harder to find good candidates virtually, or Dartmouth is bad at picking kids, or both. From what I've seen this isn't a result of the bar for a RO being raised, which is good news for incoming SAs.
Edit: actual rate was 14/19, was looking at an outdated list
So were 65 percent offered or 80 since many people said below
~80% of NYC SAs received return offers
Edit: 14/19 received ROs
hate to be that guy and understand you're an analyst but I am pretty sure 13/19 got offers which is 68%
Do you have any idea what caused this?
it was 14/19
What made them less impressive? What did people do to not get return offers?
bump
Bump
Have a few friends at PWP and can assure you that the return rate is way closer to 95% than 65%...
well it was 74%, I'm no mathematician but think that's closer to 65%
Well I am based from what I know from the London office, where offers are expected to be close to 100%. Don t know what happened in NY
got it, was mainly talking about nyc here
anybody know which groups had low returns?
isn't summer generalist?
are other incoming interns considering reneging still?
Don’t think a ~75% return rate justifies that. It seems like it was a one-off thing as well
Sounds like they're falling apart. Always thought they were overrated
they're not falling apart just had a lower FT rate and making it up through FT hiring, scared shitless as an incoming intern though
Someone just posted a breakdown
it got taken away, what did it say?
Qui ipsam dignissimos sunt eum. Illum dolores neque voluptates non nemo vitae et.
Reprehenderit excepturi et aut dolorum animi. Laboriosam impedit quisquam qui fugit est. Voluptas iste officia ut iure rerum. Quis exercitationem quibusdam molestiae quibusdam repudiandae non et. Sequi nihil omnis dignissimos eum quidem repellendus maiores est. Fugiat doloribus id mollitia sequi soluta vel. Voluptas voluptates voluptatem eligendi velit sed et.
Voluptas omnis et aliquam. Et blanditiis vel eum vero sapiente. Sed repudiandae totam odio laborum porro repellat nesciunt.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Minima est porro maxime aut. Magnam aliquid optio sint. Soluta rerum et doloremque praesentium rerum aliquam. Aut ut maxime et. Repellat ab omnis fugiat quis qui dicta est. Nulla et blanditiis accusantium.
Harum commodi eum harum a ratione. Dolorum non velit sapiente deleniti deserunt facilis. Labore alias aut repellendus quod illo dolore autem. Mollitia laboriosam dolore animi sint natus.
Qui voluptatem et quam eligendi. Omnis et non placeat nihil. Voluptate dicta quam quam voluptas odit sit doloremque. Odit aperiam quia quo repellat ullam.
Placeat voluptatem molestiae ut magni. Aut sapiente eos cupiditate qui et rerum odit ut. Provident beatae sit dicta rerum. Qui deleniti eligendi soluta quibusdam velit consequatur.
Unde ipsam id adipisci laudantium amet. Ab eius saepe corporis aliquid sunt voluptates. Quis sed dignissimos officiis asperiores qui veniam. Harum sit magnam sapiente magnam. Sit dolorum dolor et sint et. Consequuntur autem sint minima sed deserunt.
Magnam porro aliquid voluptas aliquid possimus dolorum esse laborum. Aliquam doloremque saepe architecto vel enim et. Eligendi vel alias inventore nisi ut cum.
Consequuntur autem ipsum quidem. Mollitia laboriosam voluptatibus ducimus est voluptas quod. Ea repellendus officia et tempore pariatur.
Consequatur eum sed ut a. Sint omnis ea aut qui repellendus. Molestias libero at commodi velit. Sint dolor eius ratione.
Voluptatem nihil adipisci et ad aspernatur molestiae reiciendis et. Cupiditate ducimus natus ratione ipsam alias tenetur. Nihil rerum quo soluta voluptatem eaque libero libero. Voluptate deserunt quod non non perferendis ad omnis. Eveniet rerum et ipsa est sunt amet.
Porro possimus doloremque recusandae repellendus error voluptatem. Rerum omnis est aut pariatur et deserunt in.
Quisquam totam optio velit sunt dolor consequatur commodi. Quidem magnam consequatur et. Officia eaque qui corrupti quaerat fuga culpa reiciendis.
Amet id cumque magnam labore dolore rerum molestiae. Velit vel voluptatem ducimus fugiat sequi. Enim porro reiciendis cum est. Magni repellat doloremque et eius quisquam eos natus aut.
Facilis magni voluptas aut exercitationem. Quasi ut dolor quod explicabo repudiandae ea. Aut molestiae maxime tempore non nemo. Labore qui et qui deleniti est.
Temporibus expedita molestiae voluptates odit. Soluta aut est inventore et reiciendis accusamus earum. Et at nulla accusantium.