Real Estate Debt Funds

Does anyone have experience with real estate debt funds? This could include working at, worked at, worked with, or having friends or coworkers who have worked at one. Examples would be Blackstone RE Debt Strategies, Fortress, Colony, Apollo, Oaktree, Starwood, Harrison Street, Torchlight, Rialto, NXT, Mesa West etc. This could also include non-bank real estate debt providers such as Capmark, Cornerstone, Invesco's structured finance arm.

I'm interested in hearing about overall experience, exit opps, lending parameters, compensation, work/life balance, and the interview process.

I think this space will undergo a significant amount of growth over the next few years, as banks will be forced to pull back with the implementation of Basel 3 and Dodd Frank, and there is a $1TN of CMBS debt that was originated during the boom years coming due between now and 2017. "A snake swallowing an elephant" as this Bloomberg described few weeks ago:

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-02-06/hedge-funds-preparing-for-1-tr…

 

These types of funds make sense for the investors. Lend for 12% interest and buy credit default swaps OTC, even for huge premiums, and walk away with 7-9% net returns with very low risk.

Can't see anything structurally wrong with this in the economy. :)

 

To the OP's question, yes, I have some limited experience working with them (my organization and their organization). The research analyst's of the organization I worked with averaged about $133,000 per year of all-in comp in NYC. Pretty good work-life balance since they don't serve any clients (the way an investment bank does when it's rushing to win a deal). Full of Ivy Leaguers. Sophisticated as hell--my guess is that a research analyst's interview would include questions on law, foreign policy/geopolitics, economics, finance, real estate, hedging, the Federal Reserve, etc. Since debt, high yield debt, and distressed debt can be highly event driven I would guess that the best analysts and PMs are the jack of all trades + the master of some.

 

Does anyone have any idea of the possibility of going from private equity real estate (3 yrs exp) to a HF focusing on real estate?

Are such lateral moves common/possible?

My pitch would be that I can both model the deals and understand the underlying real estate (my current job involves market research, property tours, etc.).

Does anyone have resources (ideally a guide or Excel template) on modelling distressed/high yield debt that they could share with me? I've only modeled equity investments to date.

Thanks!

 
RE Monkey:

Does anyone have any idea of the possibility of going from private equity real estate (3 yrs exp) to a HF focusing on real estate?

Are such lateral moves common/possible?

Definitely possible. I do not know anyone that has done it personally, but I do know a guy that did REIB at Lazard and then transitioned to a HF focusing in direct investments (Farallon).

 

It sounds like you mean a HF that covers real estate (REITs)? I ask because there are HF that have direct RE investments (e.g., Farallon)

The answer to both questions is yes, but if you do the former I'd start studying for the CFA

Fill the unforgiving minute with 60 seconds of run. - Kipling
 

I'm referring more to private real estate, not REITs.

I just checked the Farallon website and their RE strategy is more or less what I'm talking about:

"This strategy pursues investments in fee simple real estate, leaseholds, mortgages, or other real estate-related assets, especially in cases where redevelopment, leasing, and addition of management expertise can add value. Farallon invests across a broad range of real estate assets and at various points in the capital structure of a real estate transaction. Investments typically involve the purchase of assets that we believe are undervalued or inefficiently managed or financed, in particular assets that are valued at a significant discount to replacement cost or can be developed to higher and better uses. Farallon often partners with experienced local developers who are involved in day-to-day management and oversight of specific real estate projects."

 

Not telling you anything you don't already know, but networking. To be completely honest, it's will be challenging coming from a non-target, but for sure possible.

Check out the backgrounds on the real estate investment professionals at Farallon - > wide spectrum of backgrounds including development, REIB, REPE, debt funds. Some come from non targets, so clearly it is possible.

http://www.faralloncapital.com/our-team/investment-professionals/

 

Hi CRE-Finance, I wish I saw your post earlier. Do you have more updated data points for 2018/2019? I also work for a real estate debt fund that invests in CRE bridge loans and CMBS B-pieces. Would very much like to know the compensation structure, base and bonus, would be. And more specifically, I'm no the capital markets side, doing fund level cash flow modeling (fund returns, stress test, scenario analysis). Many Thanks,

DX
 

@CRE-Finance, what percentage of your job is originating vs. underwriting new deals? Similar question, but phrased differently, what is your day to day like? Where in the debt stack does your firm invest? Where do you source new deals from? Thank you.

 

Not that hard if the major debt fund is actually involved in investing in debt across the entire capital stack and you are involved in it. Particularly if you are doing sub-debt with participation or the like. But if you are doing that, it begs the question, why you would want to leave given where equity returns are in CRE right now relative to flexible debt capital?

 

Although I have never made the move (doing mainly debt right now), I don't think the move would be that difficult. I often see people from valuation or appraisal groups able to land an analyst gig at reputable shops so I don't think someone doing debt would be at that much of a disadvantage.

I believe labeling does go on, but I imagine that happens 7-10 years into one's career when relationships are taken into account and people are expected to hit the ground running...

 

investREanalyst I appreciate the feedback. I can understand how someone might get labeled as they spend more and more time working and building relationships as a debt guy. capratecompression are you saying you would rather have a debt guy on your team as opposed to just another equity guy? I imagine a well-rounded candidate or team would have experience on both ends, which is what I imagine you're describing.

 

First I'll say this is just opinion, if I was running the interviews...I would rather have a sound investor who worked at a top debt fund as opposed to a guy coming from an equity shop. The debt world is flooded with so much non-investment strategy complexity that I'd rather have someone with sound CRE investment insight who is well trained on the debt side (i'm not talking balance sheet lending). Equity strategy focus comes from up above anyhow, you will learn how to think. I think an analyst/associate as described above would add more value to my team.

Also depends on the type of shop, size of shop, team, etc.

 

Could anyone comment on possible exit opps/B-School's opinion on positions in debt funds..?

"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper
 

I would recommend taking a look at https://www.privatedebtinvestor.com/. They have a list of the biggest funds raised over the past few years,as well as the amounts raised. I would probably add Ares,3i, Partners Group, Highbridge, ICG as some of the more important ones. also, in case you missed it: https://www.preqin.com/docs/reports/Preqin-Special-Report-Private-Debt-….

Take care to get what you want,otherwise you will be forced to like what you get.
 

Most of the debt funds I come across just do property level deals. Usually transitional, a little hairier and higher leverage than a typical bank deal. The borrower pays for it in spread. What you're describing sounds very cool though. I cannot imagine there are many firms that do that outside of the large PE firms (Blackstone, etc.)....Using finance logic I would guess you would categorize/rank the loans in some way (bond rating for example) and then solve for the risk adjusted YTM to get your pricing on each loan and sum.

 

I think the concept here is good but there's way too much that could go wrong at the property level. I couldn't imagine not modeling out an entire fund that we're looking to acquire and not digging through all those properties - even though that would be hell. In theory solving for your risk adjusted YTM to get your price would be great but I think in real estate it's just unpractical. Too much can go wrong in the properties. Too many outlying factors. Thoughts?

 

From my experience in CRE lending, almost everything structure-wise is deal specific - trying to mitigate specific risks and ensure sponsor alignment.

As far as valuing loan portfolios, they generally start at book value and then are adjusted up or down based on loan performance, LTV, and spread...

How did the interview go? Did you learn anything else about the company?

 

Hi, thank you for the comment and sorry for the late reply - WSO wasn't notifying me of new comments which is weird.

Yes the portfolio acquisition was basically what you have just described, I asked them about it during the interview and it wasn't as "magic" as I thought it was.

The interview went OK. I did not get the job because there is a better candidate for it. The HR then put me in the upcoming superday with their AM team in the RE fund.

Observe. Learn. Share.
 

Most debt funds will focus on higher yielding debt be it mezz, transitional loans, or b pieces at an asset or portfolio level. Post GECRE sale a big void has existed for REPE financing for large scale portfolios and REIT LBOs, as GE was largely the counter party on large sponsor level financing that didn't check the conservative life co / bank debt boxes.

 

Can anyone provide some insight on the compensation that can be expected at real estate debt funds at both the Analyst and Associate levels? I realize comp can vary between a MM fund vs a MF but any insight would be appreciated.

 

Cum nostrum error illo necessitatibus aut. Laudantium cupiditate odio expedita facilis quia quidem et. Sunt ipsum dolore sapiente a. Qui cupiditate quidem omnis est minima excepturi corporis. Sed commodi voluptate repudiandae accusantium.

Ut eaque cum labore voluptas voluptatem. Laboriosam nemo non impedit officiis sit saepe dolorum. Eaque magni recusandae cupiditate occaecati amet tenetur. Autem sequi non consectetur necessitatibus maiores et et sed. Magnam voluptatem eligendi dolorum aut consequuntur quibusdam. At laborum officiis distinctio.

Commodi perferendis iusto delectus eum a soluta. Quis maiores quis tenetur ab. Modi est placeat et soluta ut quo. Omnis et natus rerum tempore eum eligendi. Perferendis quo ratione recusandae placeat delectus. Expedita ut ad libero qui illum nam autem. Animi harum dolores quidem labore nemo doloribus cum dolore.

Ut voluptatem recusandae veritatis. Eligendi facere delectus soluta est fuga aliquid fuga. Voluptas beatae dolore voluptatibus in error quia.

 

Sed sed dolor officiis eveniet voluptatibus quia at. Dolor consequatur corrupti laboriosam a eligendi natus quia. Assumenda dolores soluta voluptas necessitatibus laboriosam.

Quia quis placeat officia necessitatibus veniam maxime molestiae. Ea suscipit fugit ea veniam. Ut ab omnis aut natus rerum est beatae. Pariatur aliquam qui aperiam autem consequatur blanditiis. Non nemo atque ipsum autem quibusdam est.

Aperiam nesciunt qui sed sapiente odit. Dolorem animi quaerat et vitae. Culpa excepturi aut est consequatur harum dolores enim. Aspernatur placeat suscipit assumenda id veniam totam. Repudiandae quia omnis quod recusandae inventore. Sunt atque ex enim eius maxime voluptas minus illo.

Blanditiis ratione qui ea omnis veniam hic. Quam est in ab. Iure facilis ea aut sed dolores ratione sed. Molestiae optio distinctio qui neque.

 

Reprehenderit aut illum quia voluptatum ut maiores consequatur laborum. Impedit quia qui facere voluptatem et optio occaecati et. Sed repudiandae harum consectetur eligendi accusamus qui. Sit accusantium et doloremque velit. Enim adipisci rem consequatur quod. Minima eligendi est occaecati asperiores aliquam itaque.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”