Which is more sensitive in a DCF: FCF or the Discount Rate?

Looking at the impact of increasing taxes on valuation.

On one hand, (assuming debt is in the capital structure) the cost of debt decreases due to the larger impact of the tax shield. This reduces the associated risk of debt thus reducing the risk profile of the company, reducing the cost of that companies equity. This is also demonstrated in the formula for Levered Beta: BL = BU*(1+(1-T)(Debt%/Equity%)). So we have cost of debt and cost of equity falling with higher taxes, so a lower WACC.

However, Unlevered FCF = NOPAT + Non Cash Adjustments - Capex - Changes in Net Working Capital. Higher taxes will reduce NOPAT, which will thus reduce Unlevered FCF.

What will impact the DCF valuation more: lower FCF or lower WACC?

EDIT: Figured it out, was ridiculously simple. WACC has a greater impact because it is discounted for every forecast future period. So it's squared in year 2, cubed in year 3 etc.

10 Comments
 

WACC is more important for sure. It's also harder to estimate it, and small changes will change your decision. For example if you are calculating your returns with arithmetic or geometric average, which is only part of WACC will already make big difference by at least 1% of WACC in normal market conditions.

 

Increasing taxes lowers both WACC and FCF. The question is which has a bigger impact on valuation in an unlevered DCF.

 

Nisi earum ut explicabo laborum in consequatur tenetur. Libero optio et et omnis quo quo. Animi rem aperiam est molestiae voluptate ut.

Aut animi asperiores maxime. Et assumenda laudantium earum eum facilis qui error soluta. Voluptates quidem nobis in quia ut est ea.

Est a tempora sit quibusdam. Iusto nam a non aspernatur consequuntur sed blanditiis. Eligendi nesciunt sit veniam rerum molestias temporibus. Aut consequatur inventore atque qui blanditiis magni optio dolor.

Quia animi qui pariatur laborum reiciendis in odio. Quis quibusdam architecto est corporis voluptatem impedit vero non. Neque neque magnam debitis est. Sunt dolor nemo qui perferendis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”