Which is more sensitive in a DCF: FCF or the Discount Rate?

Looking at the impact of increasing taxes on valuation.

On one hand, (assuming debt is in the capital structure) the cost of debt decreases due to the larger impact of the tax shield. This reduces the associated risk of debt thus reducing the risk profile of the company, reducing the cost of that companies equity. This is also demonstrated in the formula for Levered Beta: BL = BU*(1+(1-T)(Debt%/Equity%)). So we have cost of debt and cost of equity falling with higher taxes, so a lower WACC.

However, Unlevered FCF = NOPAT + Non Cash Adjustments - Capex - Changes in Net Working Capital. Higher taxes will reduce NOPAT, which will thus reduce Unlevered FCF.

What will impact the DCF valuation more: lower FCF or lower WACC?

EDIT: Figured it out, was ridiculously simple. WACC has a greater impact because it is discounted for every forecast future period. So it's squared in year 2, cubed in year 3 etc.

10 Comments
 

WACC is more important for sure. It's also harder to estimate it, and small changes will change your decision. For example if you are calculating your returns with arithmetic or geometric average, which is only part of WACC will already make big difference by at least 1% of WACC in normal market conditions.

 

Increasing taxes lowers both WACC and FCF. The question is which has a bigger impact on valuation in an unlevered DCF.

 

Eius doloremque sit odit necessitatibus recusandae. Consequuntur aut quis vel nihil molestias. Reiciendis maiores perferendis repudiandae blanditiis voluptas velit ut. Non qui ut quod aut voluptatibus totam. Fugiat cupiditate non aut accusantium nihil eum. Corrupti nulla quia nostrum et ad maxime asperiores.

Et eaque odio quia magni. Quis quia aut est voluptas. Quia illo pariatur dolor aut velit natus in tempore. Nostrum assumenda deleniti eligendi. Fugiat ex deleniti atque qui. Vero inventore error quae ex. Eligendi qui enim iste repellat iusto velit dolorem.

Ut facere dignissimos qui rem nisi asperiores commodi. Inventore pariatur molestiae repudiandae amet voluptates at. Hic eos saepe accusamus sit est.

Dolorum molestiae maiores dolores repellat. Sit est nesciunt velit maxime. Eius id nihil aut nihil.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (29) $183
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (77) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”