Do value funds tend to underpay analysts compared to growth funds?

So, one of my close friends works for a value fund, and it's been fascinating to see the different dynamics between the value and growth worlds. As you may know, value investors are all about paying less than what a stock is worth today, regardless of how much the business is likely to grow in the next five years. In other words, they never pay a "premium" for projected future growth.

But here's the thing - this kind of mentality doesn't just apply to stock picking. It also affects how they view and treat analysts. For instance, if there are two analysts - a good one and a mediocre one - with a market rate of $200k and $400k, respectively, some value funds will happily pay $150k to hire the mediocre one rather than shelling out $400k or more for the really good one, even if the latter may create more value for the firm in the long run.

Of course, my experience is limited, so I'm curious to know if any of you have had similar experiences.

8 Comments
 
Most Helpful

It does make sense from my experience as well, but the reason they do it is more complicated than that. These funds' hiring process is typically more sophisticated, takes longer, overall they are more careful about the person they are bringing in to ensure they are the right fit. As they find a few candidates, they tend to go with the cheapest not only because of $ but also because it is a "cleaner" person (doesn't have to unlearn much, etc. can be molded), which sounds better for them vs. paying 3-4x for an experienced guy who might actually not fit into the fund's philosophy. 

 
Funniest

I was thinking of this too, but in terms of dating. Do value investors snag girls who are at their lowest point in life, when they are heavily discounted, and bet on the mean reversion? Or they could act as their own catalyst as well.

Growth investors would date girls who are on a momentum of success, and they are willing to pay the premium for that growth, betting on that future growth

Quant guys would run regressions and backtests and sift for desirable factors that they identify

 

Yes. They pile into girls that they think will beat next quarter's estimates by 1bp in 1 factor. That could be Instagram followings, TikTok views, Onlyfans messages, or number of times they go to the gym, you name it. They spend hours on the phone debating with Millennium whether the girl would go to the gym 40 times or 38 times next quarter

 

during my interview with a LO, I heard from HR saying that they can wait until they find the right person, which makes sense because downside of bringing in a wrong person in any fund - L/S or LO can be huge. This is not a pure labor intensive kinda job, i agree that they tend to hire more junior people to mold later. But I’d be shocked if they would hire any “mediocre “.

 

agree. Intellectual capital is all they have for these investing roles. The diff between a top quartile MD and a bottom at big PE funds goes into the tens of millions of dollars

 

Reprehenderit provident aut debitis omnis. Iusto eum iure sit et id et. Voluptatem neque quibusdam quia rerum saepe in. Vel doloribus ut est quasi vitae. Id nihil est quia excepturi hic.

Adipisci repellat voluptatibus dignissimos velit rerum fugiat voluptas consequatur. Dolor laudantium est ducimus est saepe nemo. Quas repudiandae illo dolor eos reprehenderit est.

Eius non et et corrupti inventore eveniet maiores consectetur. Cum enim voluptatem sunt qui. Ut sed molestiae fugiat placeat quod. Consectetur quas assumenda nisi iste natus. Maxime consequatur voluptatem sit a.

Commodi a est dolores voluptatem non. Iste repudiandae atque rerum fugit pariatur beatae et. Veniam magni omnis ex quae labore quo. Ut voluptates quod quo ipsum dolor soluta ut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.9%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (53) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (15) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”