Mar 20, 2025

LevFin Exits? Private Credit vs Investing Across Debt and Equity

Hi, I would love to get some general insights into potential LevFin exits as well as the comparison between Private Credit/Direct Lending and funds that invest across the capital structure (KKR SIG/Apollo HVF). Hoping to get some more context into what private credit encompasses (is it mainly direct lending/what does the breakdown of different segments look like) and how to best determine what would be better suited for my skillset/interests while also being realistic. Lastly, does anyone know whether these firms tend to go on or off-cycle? Thanks!

25 Comments
 
Most Helpful

TLDR: you could do anything from liquid credit with leveraged loans and HY bonds (very likely given levfin skillset but seats are limited), direct lending (very likely), opportunistic (less likely without prior credit/buyside investment experience), distressed (least likely unless you have a restructuring background), other specialty credit (also unlikely unless you have the relevant background).

Breaking it down in more detail, private credit would typically encompass the following:

  1. Direct Lending (senior secured loans, unitranche, subordinated/mezzanine debt)
    • Majority would be secured (backed by collateral) credit investments
    • Likely from levfin background
    • Probably good place to learn investing but not sure it’s a long-term career for everyone. Over time, you would be on the hook for sourcing deals which can be difficult + politics at play too
  2. Distressed & Special Situations (opportunistic, turnaround, rescue financing, control strategies)
    • More interesting workflows and deemed 'sexiest'. Would definitely see more variability across cap structure
    • Less likely to get into as you would need prior buyside experience or restructuring background
    • Difficult nowadays to be profitable as a pure distressed/SS player. More often that a firm traditionally known for distressed combined this with some other performing credit strategy
  3. Structured Credit & Asset Backed Lending (structuring CLOs, ABS, factoring)
    • Structuring is more technical and requires math/quant background
    • Not for me personally but very smart people and most quants I know usually get paid very well
  4. Real Estate/Infrastructure Debt
    • Senior loans, construction loans, NPLs, project finance
    • Can be quite technical so if you have a related RE/infrastructure background it would help. From an employer’s perspective they probably don’t want to train someone on RE/infrastructure technicals (especially from associate level and above)
  5. Specialty Finance
    • Venture debt, litigation finance (very interesting to me but you probably need a law degree as well), royalties
    • Quite niche so would assume you need some sort of prior investing experience to do these

Just for completeness, while you only mentioned private credit, I would suggest also looking at the public credit side which can be just as if not more lucrative: 

  1. Liquid/Opportunistic Credit at CLO or HF (senior secured/unsecured loans, subordinated/HY bonds)
    • Just lazily bunching this together but each firm is different. Some firms blend a mix of opportunistic public strategies with private credit solutions so the distinction between public and private may not be 100% clear
    • Typically performing credit but there are firms that have a wider mandate. You will still deal with distressed and restructuring scenarios because not everything will be rosy
    • Quite likely if you are coming from a levfin background
    • Could do credit HFs straight from levfin but more likely after few years in a liquid credit seat
    • More meritocratic in my opinion as you can reap the rewards of a +10pt trade you made

On your last point, I believe credit firms typically offer off-cycle internships as they want someone who has previous IB/investing internships. Would assume the big MFs do have some summer analyst positions available, but this wouldn’t be suitable for someone looking for their first internship experience. From the firms’ perspective, it’d have to be an exceptional candidate.

 

This is incredibly helpful -- thanks so much! Definitely lots to think about. As a follow up to your point about direct lending and its viability as a long-term career option, is there anything that makes it more challenging than say PE for ex?

 

Thanks so much for the detailed post—super insightful.

I'm an incoming SA at a BB and hoping to join LevFin with the goal of eventually moving into credit investing. Had a few quick Qs based on your framework:

  1. For Direct Lending (bucket 1), are there any platforms that focus more on non-sponsored deals? From what I’ve seen, most DL shops are sponsor-heavy and tend to run lighter diligence / more volume-driven processes. Curious if there are platforms that take a more underwriting-heavy approach even in DL.
  2. Where would you place something like HPS Opportunistic—more of a bucket 1 or bucket 2 strategy? (Only name that comes to mind for now.)
  3. Are there certain types of deals in LevFin that are particularly helpful if you’re trying to eventually pivot into a special sits fund, even without formal RX experience?
    For context, I did a part-time RX internship during school and went through RX SA recruiting last year but didn’t land anything.
  4. Curious if you've seen people go from LevFin → Direct Lending and then make the jump into a special sits fund (bucket 2). Wondering if it’s realistic.

Would really appreciate any thoughts—thanks again.

 
  1. It's difficult for a firm to do purely non-sponsored deals because deal flow isn't certain. Imagine if you need to source from CEOs/companies directly vs. sponsors who already own portfolio companies and are looking to buy more. Non-sponsored deals would take longer to execute although probably less competitive and therefore should yield higher returns. I don't know too many purely in non-sponsored - in fact, only person that comes to mind is a friend at Oaktree who does quite a bit of non-sponsored direct lending for emerging healthcare companies. So back to your question, I think most of the big firms (Ares, Oaktree, Apollo, HPS) plus some credit focused firms (Golub, Oak Hill, Sixth Street) should have a non-sponsored strategy set up although I wouldn't expect they would disclose this distinction in their job description. It's definitely a good question to ask if you are in the interview process.
  2. Difficult to put opportunistic credit into one bucket because each firm has a different strategy and it can be a wide mandate. It's also a mix of public and private credit. You could do anything from loans/bonds trading at 80s, non-sponsored deals, NPLs, ABLs, etc.
  3. Don't think I'm the best person to ask as I didn't do levfin. I believe the general bias against levfin is that the modelling isn't the most rigorous so it's difficult to compete vs. someone in RX. There are also some firms I've worked with on levfin side (JPM) who are better than others (those who actually did work on the credit and understand what the key concerns are from the buyside perspective rather than just selling the deal).
  4. Definitely seen the first jump from levfin to DL. Most of the time, headhunters tell me special sits people come from RX although there are backgrounds from M&A, PE, liquid credit, law as well. Easier said than done, but the key is to excel at your job, show more curiosity to learn more beyond just doing the deal for deals' sake, and you should be able to land anywhere you want regardless of the prejudice against a specific field. Network, read distressed debt investing books, start investing on your own (even if not in credit). 
 

Annoyingly, for whatever reason, the market views the credit skillset as less flexible than PE. In general, if you start a career in credit, it's likely that you will stay in credit for good whereas you have more optionality in PE to do other things (corp dev, HF, VC, and it's easier to shift to credit from PE than vice versa). I don't necessarily agree with this view because you have significantly more deal flow in credit vs. PE and probably have a better understanding of various sectors at a junior level (usually siloed by sector in PE from the very beginning). I believe being a generalist as a junior helps you develop more insights & perspective for all types of businesses and that is only beneficial as an investor. In fact, I was contacted by some headhunters for HFs (Citadel, Millennium) who mention there has actually been more of a preference towards candidates in credit because of this deal experience, so hopefully this shift in perspective continues. Regardless, there are very interesting jobs within credit on both private and public side that will allow you to make comfortable amount of $$$ for the amount of hours worked so even though the absolute compensation in PE is higher, my hypothesis is the $/hour is higher in credit (at least for me when I compare with my peers in PE, HF, and IB). Also boring disclaimer - credit has undergone a boom cycle for the last 4 years so this might not continue going forward. 

In addition, there have been several posts that describes DL exits pretty well. In sum, I would say that credit is probably the exit everyone is looking for, but it might not be the right start for one's career unless you have a specific passion for credit.

https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/credit/private-credit-exit-opportunities

https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/credit/private-credit-exit-ops 

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”