Fitness vs Traditional Watches (in Office)

Incredibly dumb topic but it’s a slow morning so thought I’d pass this along… what are your opinions on fitness watches (Garmin/Fitbit/Suunto) in the office as opposed to the traditional IB watch brands? Mainly do you think it comes off as a subtle flex of keeping an active lifestyle or does it hit as unprofessional in the workplace? I’ve seen a growing number of juniors wearing the above brands and I am a longtime wearer of a more bulky Garmin model but I switched the band from the nylon strap to a faux-leather strap for appearances and it seems to do fine. The obvious compromise at surface-level would be the Apple Watch Ultra but the battery life blows compared to the 10-15+ days per full charge you get with the fitness trackers so IMO that’s a non-starter. Furthermore wearing two watches (one during office hours and one while working out) really negates the usefulness of the fitness tracker by skewing the data you receive as it only tracks during workouts and not during daily activities so that’s not an option. Is this where the whoop’s market space is?? Again, incredibly dumb topic but want to gauge the forum’s sentiments before I pull the trigger on another fitness tracker and further delay my entrance into the submariner rabbit hole.

48 Comments
 

I'm a big watch guy but am also into fitness so I wear an Oura ring. I take it off for weightlifting, so I don't scratch it but wear it for other workouts and for sleep. I do like the Garmin though and would definitely get one, I just enjoy my other watches more. 

My MD wears a bright red G Shock that his kid got him. I've seen summer interns wearing Rolexes. It doesn't really matter. 

 

Been rocking the silver ōura ring and its been nice. A bit chunky but far better than wearing a second watch.

I try to power through workouts with it but tend to take it off out of annoyance, I could care less if it gets scratched.

 

My take is that juniors who prefer to wear watches would rather wear a “safe” Apple Watch than take a gamble on a traditional watch. If you wear too nice of a watch others in the office may take it the wrong way. If you wear a cheap watch, you look tacky. Plus an Apple Watch has fitness components and you can see messages throughout the day without being caught looking at your phone.

 

TBH it's unlikely that anyone in the office cares as much as you think. I rotate between an AWU2, Santos and Sub depending on what I'm wearing and what I have on (nice dinner after work? I'll put on a nicer watch). No one bats an eye unless they are curious about watches. If colleagues give you shit for the watch you wear, then you're in the wrong team/firm.

 

TBH it's unlikely that anyone in the office cares as much as you think. I rotate between an AWU2, Santos and Sub depending on what I'm wearing and what I have on (nice dinner after work? I'll put on a nicer watch). No one bats an eye unless they are curious about watches. If colleagues give you shit for the watch you wear, then you're in the wrong team/firm.

Agree and I think that, generally, people who wear watches can appreciate watches across the spectrum. I just...wouldn't care or clown an analyst if they were wearing either a Rolex or $20 Casio.

Array
 
Most Helpful

In terms of prestige, here's the definitive ranking: 

Tier 1:
Whoop and Oura:
Pretty much the Oxford and Cambridge of wearables. Donning a Whoop band broadcasts that you're playing in the big leagues. Orlando Bravo wears it and so should you. It's sleek, elite, and subtly screams high-stakes deal-making. The Oura ring, while not as visually streamlined as the Whoop, and undoubtedly less subtle, still garners the similar recognition. It's not just a wearable; it's a conversation starter, the gateway to your next big deal.
 

Tier 1.5:
Garmin: Think of this as the LSE of wearables. Not quite the old guard but with enough prestige and performance to demand respect. Preferred by the athletically inclined execs who balance spreadsheets by day and triathlon training by night. Wear a Garmin, and you'll get respect from the PortCo CEO who prides himself on his Ironman finishes as much as his sweet (read: sweat) equity payout. 
 

Tier 2:
Polar and Suunto:
These are okay. Reliable, sturdy, but without the cachet to turn heads in the airport lounge. They're not really wearables, but sports watches: great for the serious athlete but not going to impress your Whoop/Patek-combo CEO at a gala dinner. Could make it up the ranks with a high-profile endorser like Bryan Johnsen, but these brands currently lack the clout to bridge the gap from performance to prestige.
 

Non-target:
Fitbit and any Wish-product:
Complete non-target energy. Fitbits are for people on Ozempic, not for the people investing in it. Will likely lose you mandates if you wear it to a pitch. Makes you a loser. In the world of high-finance, these are more than just fashion faux pas, they're career-limiting electronics that scream back-office. 

I don't know... Yeah. Almost definitely yes.
 

i wear my fitbit on my right, and regular watch on my left. I chose one of the smaller fitbits so its more subtle since i only use it for heart rate tracking. The other ones are cool, but i refuse to pay a subscription for a fitness watch..

Go all the way
 

I don't think it would count against you to wear 2 watches or wear a fitness watch. Wear whichever one you like/feel comfortable using. Personally, Garmin, Samsung and Apple are the best I used. If you get a FitBit do not get the smartwatch kind that has apps because Google bought them over and the newer FitBits are worse than the old ones. Not worth the hassle. Garmin has the best build quality for sure. 

 

My 2c, I've been on fundraising trips and DD trips to meet with very senior decision makers at LPs, banks, corporates, and (based on my completely personal anecdote) in the last decade or so I've found that my Garmin has generated way more traction and personal connections than fancy watches (PP, AP, Rolex). Inevitably someone will ask if I'm a runner, and we'll add each other on Strava (way more powerful than LinkedIn as a connectivity tool), and the relationship gets built.

Ask yourself really what you're really going for with the fancy watch - and if it's going to generate way more downside (jealousy, badmouthing) than upside (can't think of any), then don't do it. 

 

As a former collegiate rower, the chest band is the authoritative sensor location for heart rate monitoring. I used a Polar H10.

 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 

It's 2023. I don't think anyone cares. I show up with a $20 casio watch. Don't even wear it. But, keep it in my pocket for pragmatic reasons. However, I don't know what I would do if I saw one of my interns wearing a silly spongebob watch.

 

Oh my. I am a total nimrod. Honestly I deserve every bit of shit I can get for saying that.

 

The short story is that very few people will notice or care.

The long version is that fitness devices and smart watches have become commonplace. I'd consider myself a watch enthusiast and of course look for what people are wearing. Do I think a smart watch with a suit looks a bit silly? Yeah. But I'm probably in the minority.

Personally, I wear a Whoop (big fan of the device and the app, btw) on one wrist and a traditional watch on the other. Another feature of the Whoop is that you can wear it in a bicep band or other holder so it can't be seen if you'd prefer only one occupied wrist.

 

Rerum a ducimus dolores laborum reiciendis tempore fugit rerum. Perspiciatis fugiat voluptatum corporis nihil et ad. Voluptate rerum labore ut totam. Sit expedita aliquid beatae. Modi voluptate amet autem ab repellendus minus. Optio molestiae quia deleniti perferendis eum. At ratione deleniti qui harum dolorem.

Aut consequuntur aut vel nobis voluptas. Enim est vitae et.

 

Consequatur hic et aut voluptates odio. Rerum ratione minus voluptate ea eius distinctio. Et a quis tempore voluptatibus consequatur. Consectetur molestias porro quibusdam vero sit placeat eos. Enim dolores perferendis atque et magni eos nihil omnis. Eveniet rerum culpa laborum. Temporibus voluptates facere error dolore omnis adipisci dolorum.

Molestias maxime quidem veritatis provident. Ad aperiam necessitatibus quia. Aut est sint optio et esse ducimus.

Maxime quia facilis quod amet autem ut et. Culpa maiores dolorem exercitationem atque tenetur quo quis hic. Libero tenetur aut aut.

Reiciendis cum id laboriosam sunt. Qui animi reiciendis cumque facilis sequi. Repudiandae ea id totam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (48) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”