Company A has Equity value of $1,000 and Net Income of $100
Company B has equity value of $2,000 and Net Income of $50
Both have 10 shares outstanding
Company A wants to buy company B
In an all stock deal, how much in EBIT synergies must be realized for the deal to be accretion/dilution neutral? Tax rate = 40%
| +150 | Senior Banker's Guide to IB Recruiting / Group Placement (with a Healthcare Bent) | 22 | 4h |
| +140 | As Lehman people reconvene at UBS, Barclays needs to hire (2023) | 21 | 4h |
| +123 | Is pay at BofA really that bad? | 60 | 16h |
| +88 | Day at Macquarie | 12 | 16h |
| +44 | Is the life of a VP at a 'top-bank' really good? | 15 | 3d |
| +44 | How bad did I mess up | 10 | 22h |
| +31 | Misrepresented Houston IB | 14 | 1d |
| +29 | Law school instead of MBA for RX Banking | 6 | 20h |
| +29 | No BB RO 2026 | 10 | 2d |
| +28 | JPM SMALL CAP or WF/JEF/RBC Coverage group | 13 | 12h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
4,000?
In an all stock deal, if the buyer's P/E > seller's P/E wouldn't it be dilutive regardless if the question assumes same tax rate, no premium etc?
Would it be 83.3 of EBIT synergies? Company A EPS is 10, Company B is 5. Need to get company B EPS to 10. That means the company needs an extra 50 in post-tax income, or 83 dollars in pre-tax income. Now company B's EPS is 10, which matches Company A's, and therefore accretive/dilution netural.
Do the equity values imply that company b share holders would need to receive shares in the combined entity 1:2 for it to go through? Then synergies would need to be 2x that
I believe the answer is $210. My math is as follows:
Company A has to issue 20 shares at $100 per share (share price implied by $1,000 equity value / 10 shares) in order to acquire Company B ($2,000 equity value). 20 new shares + 10 existing shares = 30 pro forma shares outstanding. Pro forma net income is $150 ($100 from Company A + $50 from Company B), resulting in $5 EPS. This is obviously dilutive compared to Company A's standalone $10 EPS, so you'll need to back in to how much incremental net income is needed to get you to $10 pro forma EPS (i.e. breakeven). You would need an additional $150 of net income to get to $10 EPS ($150 pro forma net income + $150 net income from synergies / 30 shares outstanding). However, that $150 of net income needs to be grossed up for taxes to get an EBIT figure, so $150/1.4 to account for 40% tax results in $210 EBIT synergies needed to break even.
Someone please check me and thank you for coming to my TED talk
Wouldn’t it be $250 in EBIT to get $150 in Net Income as net income would equal 250(1-t) = 250(0.6) = 150
Yes you are correct, that is an arithmetic mistake on my part
I believe it would be 250 b/c divide 150/(1-tax rate) = 150/.6 = 250 EBIT synergies.
Ut ea sint ut nemo praesentium. Voluptatem dolore fugit sint ipsam dignissimos quo ratione.
Amet dolor quos ut in aut quia autem. Non consectetur sequi autem accusamus. Ut non vitae ea reiciendis amet dolorem. Perferendis odio non repudiandae omnis aut ea.
Laudantium id molestias blanditiis autem. Alias sit nihil eos iusto totam tempore deserunt voluptatem. Perferendis voluptatem reiciendis nemo labore voluptatem eius.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...