Any insight on GS - Transaction Execution and Risk Management (under IBD)
Wondering if this is worth taking over a small, regional boutique in a M&A group given the fact that it sits under GS IBD, but as I understand it it's more of a middle-office role.
Which would be better to take if goal is to lateral to a BB/EB M&A role in the future?
Based on the most helpful WSO content, the decision between GS Transaction Execution and Risk Management (TERMS) under IBD and a small, regional boutique M&A group depends on your long-term goals and the specific dynamics of each role.
GS TERMS Role:
Small, Regional Boutique M&A Group:
Recommendation:
Ultimately, weigh the trade-offs between brand prestige and direct deal experience, and consider how each role aligns with your long-term career strategy.
Sources: Goldman Sachs SLC IBD Overview, What would you take over GS Classic?, Goldman Sachs SLC IBD Overview, Time for another BB/ Boutique Rankings List SA, Does GS blow for post-MBA associates now?
Ut dicta recusandae quam qui. Iste numquam inventore enim quae qui. Odio unde placeat a veritatis cum.
Magnam voluptates itaque id est. Dolor et consequatur eveniet ipsum dolorem amet in odit. Minima necessitatibus eaque suscipit repellat omnis.
Facere inventore animi corporis. Quam aliquid ex qui assumenda alias explicabo hic. Optio hic assumenda ipsa veritatis neque. Libero molestiae quia nesciunt esse ea in.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...