Best teams for private equity exit ops

aside from the product group M&A, what industry/sector teams are best for exit opps into PE? I've generally heard TMT is the best team aside from M&A, whereas FIG isn't a good team for moving to PE? What other teams are strong/bad for exit opps into PE? Or does it depend on the bank

50 Comments
 

Do you mean Restructuring advisory (these aren't product groups) at EBs (EVR/PJT/Moelis)? Restructuring product groups exist at BBs for financing and virtually have no exit opps to PE.

The quote below is taken from a different post and should clear things up:

"Highly Leveraged."

Lots of confusion on the board so as someone currently working in Leveraged Finance, I'll clear it up for you:

Barclays RX (or any bulge bracket RX group for that matter) focuses on DIP financing or any sort of debt issuance for companies in stress. The advisory portion is almost always done by a specialized RX shop such as Lazard/HLHZ/Blackstone.

Basically it works like this: company is in distress and bondholders are threatening to take control over the company. Company hires bankruptcy lawyers and RX bankers (usually Lazard or Blackstone/PJT for debtor side) to advise them on what to do next. RX bankers and lawyers suggest a chapter 11 to buy some time and then formulate a turnaround strategy, but as with any plan, the plan requires financing in order to execute it. The RX bankers call up the big banks' restructuring groups (ex. DB, JPM, or Barclays usually) and say hey we have this turnaround plan but we need $300mm of financing (ex. DIP revolving credit facility) to execute upon it - given the amount and circumstances, what terms can you offer us? The bulge bracket RX groups discuss with their syndicate groups (and this actually gets interesting because the terms are heavily reliant on the circumstance, situation, quality of plan, strategy of creditors yada yada, very diff from a plain vanilla leveraged loan / HY Bond refinancing). Each of the bulge bracket groups submit the terms they're willing to offer for the loan and the company (with the advice of the RX banker/lawyer) will select a bank to offer the lead-left mandate. Even if the other banks don't win the lead-left mandate, a handful of them are usually brought along as joint bookrunners for the syndication so they still get fees. The bank executes the DIP facility, and earns $$$.

6 months later, the turnaround strategy is successful and the company is ready to refinance their DIP facility into a regular credit facility (revolver + term loan). Unsurprisingly, the one who was lead left on the DIP facility gets first dibs and priority to lead the refinancing (and earns $$$ again). The lead-left bulge bracket bank develops a great relationship with the CEO and has priority in offering the full suite of products of the investment bank going forward.

As you can see the role of the BB RX team is the financing side. The advisory side (which is usually what people are referring to when they speak of RX) is done by the RX-specialized shops. With that said, the BB RX teams who are offering the financing still need to have a very good understanding of the situation and the bankruptcy code (just like the real RX bankers) in order to dictate what terms to offer for the financing. The only difference is that they're getting paid for the financing, not their "strategic advice" - the ones getting paid for the "strategic advice" are the RX shops.

Of course it varies from situation by situation but that's generally how it works. Hope this clears up some misunderstandings on this board.

 

UBS LA, CSFB LA, etc.

but all this is irrelevant. If you are starting now as analyst, in 2-3 years PE will have hit it's downturn, as it always does, lots of shops will not be able to raise another fund, and the job market will be flooded with experienced PE folks who've been kicked out. I don't think there will be much analyst placement then into PE.

Timing the cycle is everything...

 

Super ironic looking back on this....

"jajaja" UBS LA, CSFB LA, etc.

but all this is irrelevant. If you are starting now as analyst, in 2-3 years PE will have hit it's downturn, as it always does, lots of shops will not be able to raise another fund, and the job market will be flooded with experienced PE folks who've been kicked out. I don't think there will be much analyst placement then into PE.

Timing the cycle is everything...

 

Heard top firms like KKR recruit at Goldman M&A, etc as well as Gleacher, Evercore. Your chances are probably better - smaller analyst class means less politicking, hopefully more diverse range of skills.

 
Banking34075I guess I'll start it off and we'll go from there. Feel completely free to chime in as well!

Top Tier:

GS TMT MS M&A GS FIG BX Restructuring BX M&A

Next Tier:

JPM M&A JPM Lev. Fin. CS Fin. Sponsors GS Healthcare BAML Lev. Fin./FSG Citi M&A Lazard Restructuring Greenhill Generalist Evercore Generalist Moelis Generalist

Any ideas where the other GS industry groups stack up?

 
Banking34075I guess I'll start it off and we'll go from there. Feel completely free to chime in as well!

Top Tier:

GS TMT MS M&A GS FIG BX Restructuring BX M&A

Next Tier:

JPM M&A JPM Lev. Fin. CS Fin. Sponsors GS Healthcare BAML Lev. Fin./FSG Citi M&A Lazard Restructuring Greenhill Generalist Evercore Generalist Moelis Generalist

This ranking seems fairly accurate, although i've heard that blackstone M&A is not that strong.

Also certain groups place very well at certain funds. Examples include GS TMT with silver lake, GS FIG with carlyle, Citigroup leveraged finance with oaktree, MS M&A with KKR, etc.

 

aren't all of GS's top industry groups outstanding (TMT, FIG, consumer, healthcare, industrials)? what about MS's top groups? how are they not above most of the groups in the tier 2 listed above?

I'm pretty sure all the rankings on here are done by high school/college kids.

in general: blackstone (all), all GS groups, most MS groups, BB M&A/levfin/sponsors

 

I understand that most people think these threads are useless, but if nothing else they are at least interesting to a lot of students. Sure they may be flawed, a waste of time, and geared towards prestige whores, but what is the motivation to tell everyone on here that you don't like this thread? How is that useful at all? Might as well just let people share their opinions regardless of how dumb they may be.

 
in_the_money23I understand that most people think these threads are useless, but if nothing else they are at least interesting to a lot of students. Sure they may be flawed, a waste of time, and geared towards prestige whores, but what is the motivation to tell everyone on here that you don't like this thread? How is that useful at all? Might as well just let people share their opinions regardless of how dumb they may be.

I also agree that these threads are pretty superficial and boneheaded.

However, I can commiserate with kids who are trying to get into PE in the long term and need intermediate goals to aim for. You need to set your sights somewhere--either for general recruitment or for group selection and selldays.

Event Business Academy +44 7508341649 [email protected]
 

Exactly! The point is to at least figure out which groups provide you at least a relatively good chance to break into a MF. I know that many groups are looked at much more favorably when it comes to the recruitment, so it'd be nice to get your views on this issue in terms of what you've heard about certain groups placing very well. It doesn't have to be primarily a ranking issue; just in general which groups do you think provide the best shot to break in.

 

I heard from an Ass 2 at GS that his MD, in TMT, knew someone at KKR who was at MS in FIG who said that they only take BX RTC, JPM Lev Fin/FIG/TMT/MM/FSG, GS IBD/TMT/DCM, MS M&A/LBO/DCF, RBS ECM, UBS TMT/ETF trading, CS FSG and LB CDO. They all went to HPY or Ox Camb for undergrad.

But that's just what I've heard.....

"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper
 
PapagogoAfter you guys work in BB IBD for a few years you will realize how stupid this kind of rankings are

...these kinds of rankings are (countable)

or

...this kind of ranking is (non-countable)

Take your pick.

My name is Nicky, but you can call me Dre.
 
aempirei
PapagogoAfter you guys work in BB IBD for a few years you will realize how stupid this kind of rankings are

...these kinds of rankings are (countable)

or

...this kind of ranking is (non-countable)

Take your pick.

Huh? Countability is simply a statement of cardinality. You mean order-able.

 

Nemo et quis dolores unde non consequuntur. Velit vel et ut. Possimus praesentium voluptatem quas aliquid ut. Sed facere amet et.

Nisi est vel sint in error quasi. Fuga tempora iste id. Ad et nihil sit optio vero quisquam nulla. Esse vero distinctio dolor nihil omnis dolorem occaecati. Aut quo voluptatem voluptate ducimus beatae aut. Ut pariatur non voluptas voluptatem eum nisi. Facere optio non voluptatem ut sit.

Unde ut aut reprehenderit dolor. Quidem amet unde ratione non qui aut quisquam. Est fuga ea et optio odit laudantium quo. Voluptatem beatae maxime aliquam saepe.

Learn Programming, Lectures by Professor Mehran Sahami for the Stanford Computer Science Department http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KkMDCCdjyW8
 

Aut ipsum consequatur consequuntur dolore. Saepe assumenda harum corporis mollitia ratione. Pariatur id ut dolorem autem quia sunt. At cumque ut odio aperiam qui.

Totam quisquam eos aperiam doloribus molestiae. Ut quae voluptatem ipsam laboriosam sed. Ut placeat dolorum amet tenetur autem est deleniti.

Dolore tempora atque est provident ipsa qui ducimus. Excepturi reiciendis expedita ut provident sequi. Minus ut accusantium libero beatae id. Asperiores quasi voluptates est eius perferendis facilis ea. Est reiciendis omnis velit vel et saepe.

 

Beatae quis vitae et debitis asperiores qui eos. Perferendis cum velit blanditiis mollitia et aperiam sunt.

Est placeat odio qui vel expedita aut vero. Occaecati quod saepe sequi quisquam.

Rem illum rerum cum. Doloremque mollitia quibusdam provident. Ipsa ut debitis iure accusamus necessitatibus ducimus omnis. Et eos corrupti provident consequatur.

At aut perferendis et laborum temporibus dolorem. Corporis voluptatem eos ipsam consectetur eaque ad. Necessitatibus ratione eos commodi sint quis doloremque pariatur. Optio quia nam omnis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”