198 Comments
 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 

Relax ... it's only an hour or two into the day, they have like 30 associates on some of their teams

 

Analyst 1 in IB-M&A:

Relax ... it's only an hour or two into the day, they have like 30 associates on some of their teams


Maybe “30 associates” this is the problem

 

Noticed most the low comp comes from the mba associate class, usually the more experienced aso classes have gotten better numbers

 

For what it is worth I received this shit comp while my groups revenue was Up 30% YoY

I understand shafting mid / low performers but I don’t understand drastically under paying high achievers

It’s clear to me there is an associate bubble at this bank that they want to get rid of. I get the business rationale, but just be straight up with people and fire them if you want them out.

 

Have to find a new job at this point

Not seeing how others are getting wide ranges of comp compared to what our group got 

 

These pay numbers are quite different from what people received last year 

Think decent to good performing asos were getting at least 80-100k last year 

 

Doesn’t seem to be in line with what others have gotten, did you comment on the correct post? 

 

I knew my bonus was going to be bad so I played politics with a few MDs in case they ended up with enough to slide me a tip… instead I got shafted and now one of my MDs asked if I would be quiet quitting because he needs someone to help babysit his kid.

Times are getting rough here at BofA. I think I might have to take him up on his offer.

 

Very surprised by the significant pay below street. BofA has historically been a “low beta” bank in terms of both bank performance and bonuses. This year despite the bank performing OK relative to others they chose to absolutely ream their employees.

My thoughts are they’re trying to get people to quit in lieu layoffs to avoid bad publicity. Problem is there’s nowhere to go.

 

Left BofA last year and glad I did. It's almost as if BofA could've avoided all of this by getting rid of the dead weight Associates like every other bank on the street did... ~60 Associates in M&A and easily 40+ Associates in many industry groups (bigger than some entire coverage/product teams at some banks btw)... At $175k to $225k a head just to keep the machine on - in this market? Why is anyone at BofA surprised? 

I just feel bad for the Associates, VPs and Directors who actually pulled their weight (frankly, more weight than usual cause they need to pick up after the low quality COVID hires) and got shit bonuses because there are so many mouths to feed. Wouldn't be surprised if strong performers start leaving to competitors and the poor performers with little to no deal reps stay because the salary is good. Hell, I sure would if it were me, especially since BofA protects their A&As 

 

Yes that’s precisely what I’m noticing - the market combined with bloated headcount is creating a class of “haves” and “have nots.” A subset of people are on critical accounts, getting cranked, getting good deal experience, but are frustrated by the comp numbers. Another subset of people are not getting deal experience, working on easy pitches, market updates, etc. Their bonus was bad but they’re also working like 9-7 on low stakes stuff and are essentially cruising.

Would note that this is primarily BofA’s fault, not the candidates. BofA hired and retained a ton of people the past couple years with the expectation of aggressive growth across the bank, which has not materialized.

In my opinion, the only solution is to lay off analysts and associates unfortunately. Cutting bonuses won’t work and will just piss people off who are actually working. If you’re cruising on pitches, not working a lot, etc. what’s the incentive to leave when you’re making $200k base?

I know juniors in the group who are actually working are frustrated. They’re essentially subsidizing the fixed overhead of the people who are coasting.

 
Controversial

I think it's important to note that Natixes, the purple touch, ranked Most Impressive Bank (in France) back to back 2021 & 2022, did not pay Associate 3s $20K bonuses this year. I feel like Natixes (#1 ranked bank for Insurance Debt in France as of 2024 YTD) should be in the convo for BB rankings more now that BofA, DB and Wells have all fallen off

 

I don’t work in IB but think it’s crazy how some analysts or associates can put up with 80+ hours weekly for a year only to get a bonus equivalent to 1-2 months of base salary. 
 

I have a friend who works in corporate banking who seems to make the same base but a similar to higher bonus, but works probably 9-5 or 6 on most days, and no weekends. Not saying corporate banking is necessarily a better job but on an hourly basis it seems certainly more relaxing to have a job like that 

 

VP2. TC low 500s. Low single digit % decrease from last year. All things considered not wildly upset.

 

If BofA clearly wants certain people to quit, why didn’t they just tell the people they have one of 2 options. Either 0 bonus and stay, or that $30k shit bonus and agree to voluntary leave by X date? Not trying to advocate for banks to give 0 bonus, but if they clearly are trying to get people to quit, wouldn’t this be an easier way to do it without screwing over all moral? Imagine if they did this, they could utilize the people who want to stay rather than $30k and then allocate the $30k to others in the Group so comp isn’t so bad for the mid/high performers.

 

There was sub buckets within middle bucket (meets meets). I’ve seen “meets meets” Aso1 yesterday get dependent on group:

0 10 20 27.5 30 35 This is all speculation but, lots of folks that were “meets meets” this year and got those bottom 3 were former “meets exceeds or exceeds meets” in previous years. Feels like they want some to stay (they won’t) despite the garbage numbers I could be wrong who knows

Edit: added the year

 

Yes- I would say I have 2 things going for me: probably more experience than almost anyone on my team so I’m able to get things done quickly as well as an extremely strong work ethic. My hours are about 50/week. Also- I’ve brought in a ton of revenue. So much that I have a cash retention bonus scheduled to be paid every year for the next 3 years on top of my bonus so that I don’t quit. Probably an outlier and should have a better title than VP but I’m letting it ride since it comes easy for me. I would say that I’m not top bucket but actually the top of the entire bucket. 

 

Here are my thoughts. Last year middle bucket was around 45-50k. The second half of 2023 was stronger than the first half and hopefully Q1 and Q2 of 2024 are stronger quarters. If that holds up I would expect analyst bonuses to at least be in line with last years. Also I feel that some groups are less inflated at the analyst level. I’m a second year in a coverage group and the analyst work way more than the associates (some associates basically have nothing to do). Just my 2 cents though.

 

I'd expect middle performers to leave. While even the top people had a tough year, the middle and bottom really got hit hard. The bottom won't leave as they liekly won't find a better job and BofA won't fire anyone. True, even good people who want to leave may struggle to land something but have much better chance than bottom folks.

 

Seems as if literally everyone in the group knows the problem except for leadership lol.

When you don’t fire people and you don’t pay well, it incentivizes coasting. Not only that, it encourages the bottom performers to stay because they 1) have nowhere else to go, 2) can cruise snd collect their base, and 3) don’t have enough deal reps to go somewhere else even if they tried. 
 

To someone else’s point, I think middle performers (and to a lesser extent, top performers) are going to leave and BofA is going to be stuck with the scrubs.

 

I hear you and I get what you’re saying but we’re talking about people’s livelihoods. I’m at a different bank that has headcount issues, in my group at least and the vast majority of the people who are ‘coasting’ would love to be working on deals and grinding.

I know what you’re saying, I get it…There are people taking advantage of the situation but don’t lose sight of  the above. Also, ignore my title because I am more senior but IB is NEVER properly staffed. Either too many people or too little.

 

Yep that’s fair. When the market eventually turns around people will leave in droves and at the same time the market will be cooking, so makes sense to plan for that to an extent.

Understood on the livelihoods point but I know the IB seniors aren’t thinking like that. They laid off a few VPs and Ds without notice, and I’d argue their livelihoods are way more negatively impacted than an associate would be (house, kids, etc). Not to mention EVERY OTHER BANK laid off at least a handful of associates, I think it’s necessary to keep the ecosystem going. I just don’t get the strategy of what they are trying to do, by keeping all of this associate bloat and not paying well across the board.

 

Labore omnis culpa mollitia ut. Nihil nemo fugit mollitia quam earum soluta quam nihil.

Optio eos provident voluptas totam repellendus porro sequi. Sunt iusto eos ipsa ea ut voluptas. Nostrum commodi et rerum laudantium.

Voluptates possimus numquam quo facilis in. Sit odio non reprehenderit et.

 

Sit rerum et voluptatem libero. Numquam iusto voluptatem et totam non. Doloribus nihil rerum doloribus quia perferendis nemo.

Itaque voluptate eaque occaecati quisquam vel at tenetur. Ratione maxime ex incidunt sequi ipsam consequatur. Quidem ipsam iusto dolore. Ut itaque distinctio vero pariatur ad cupiditate laudantium fuga.

Temporibus optio praesentium aut quo. Sit tempore placeat amet cum labore. Dicta eos nulla ut. Culpa nihil neque provident quia illo ut explicabo consequatur.

 

Consequuntur consequatur qui debitis iusto aut. Aut autem debitis molestias doloribus pariatur earum facilis. Tempore accusamus ad architecto ipsam id occaecati vero. Ea sunt optio magnam ut. Earum eius cum quia dolores perspiciatis nihil qui. Ea optio maxime inventore est est. Suscipit ipsam et quia eveniet ea et.

Occaecati eligendi dicta non aperiam consequatur nam. Asperiores molestiae sit dolor alias aut. Adipisci repellendus est placeat nobis. Voluptatem aspernatur perferendis dolor odio suscipit consectetur. Harum quia officiis aspernatur voluptatum magni.

Maiores cupiditate tenetur ea enim rerum est quam voluptate. Ut ut exercitationem id culpa quasi optio. Tempora est tenetur eligendi atque et qui molestias. Ullam omnis voluptas laboriosam eum et sint pariatur. Ut quis nesciunt sit dolor.

 

Laboriosam dignissimos consequuntur corrupti sint mollitia distinctio et. Voluptates consequatur officiis hic eum quod. Aut dolorem labore quidem quia nihil id doloremque. Sit mollitia repellat minima omnis.

Sed sed quod dolore qui. Minima enim voluptatum similique et autem. Quidem in totam qui voluptas repellat nihil.

A harum voluptatem dolorem vel eos magnam. Qui delectus excepturi perferendis ipsa quia. Incidunt quibusdam illo doloremque impedit voluptas.

 

Consequatur aut pariatur voluptatum. Porro quo nesciunt at unde atque tempore explicabo dolores. Quis cumque quia tenetur amet totam.

Ad sed aperiam consequuntur voluptatem est quia minima. Molestiae aut rerum eum saepe. Consequatur quis aspernatur tenetur est nisi necessitatibus cupiditate. Quia error deleniti molestias consequuntur amet quo.

Odio et error quia porro nam eligendi eius. Nam totam quae natus mollitia. Sunt tenetur repellat et ea aliquam suscipit. Quis omnis vero et architecto quo. Delectus adipisci est quaerat fugit dolorem nisi. Illo iure qui aspernatur doloribus.

 

Voluptatum accusantium iure veniam iste sequi. Porro dignissimos rem voluptas perspiciatis iste et aut et. Non aliquid et odit magnam et. Tempora voluptate ad et explicabo molestiae officiis.

Non ratione quia architecto sit pariatur doloribus. Pariatur ea illum eum est molestiae quia culpa. Accusantium eum inventore qui rerum dolores dolorem et. Magni et iusto ut quia assumenda. Rem atque voluptatem temporibus fuga. Accusamus blanditiis velit nam praesentium nobis.

Cupiditate maiores cum modi. Nesciunt consequatur vero magni alias. Quis placeat repudiandae aliquam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”