Does anyone have any insight into this firm? Found out about an open position and just want to find out so more info - anything from deal flow to exit opps to team size would be appreciated.
Thanks!
| +327 | Which Offer to Accept: UBS Analyst Role or Part Time Cashier at the Local Taco Bell | 41 | 4h |
| +250 | AI is insane | 32 | 5h |
| +231 | I Snuck Into UBS Office And Took A Shit On The Floor | 22 | 4h |
| +186 | Useless associates | 29 | 5h |
| +181 | Differences in Restructuring Teams? | 31 | 12h |
| +174 | How do you manage nerves in IB technical interviews? | 16 | 5h |
| +154 | TPH V.S. Mizuho [HOU] | 22 | 11h |
| +149 | GF is an IB Analyst at a top BB, hates it, what exit options does she have? | 26 | 7h |
| +141 | Roku-Fox Deal - UBS Misses Out on yet another deals after years chasing this deal | 24 | 4h |
| +140 | Shame on you Evercore - SA 28 | 37 | 5h |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
sounds very communist
heard the janitor makes the same salary as the ceo
Carl Marks lost some leadership to Teneo Capital if I recall. Otherwise they're fairly unknown considering how long they've been around.
Decent in Rx, weak brand name in general M&A.
Two of their Rx execs left for Teneo
Proven time and time again that this firms business model doesn't work, however, some people still think it is a good idea.
Carl Marks & Co.? (Originally Posted: 12/04/2006)
Does anyone know much about Carl Marks & Co.? Any information is helpful! Thanks
Example?
Basically every other firm in history that has tried this model has failed miserably. Also tends to be a huge cultural chasm between junior and senior bankers.
Amazing name for a bank! Wonder whether the Co stand for Lenin, Trotsky and Mao...
It is all of US, comrade.
I think your exit opps would be severely limited. Their team bios completely suck.
I heard that they have this weird requirement that all analysts have to have really woolly beards, unkempt hair and an addiction to debt and illogical rantings about "exploitation" and "the bourgeois morality"...also one must have a rich friend who's willing to subsidize his life for the next 50+ years, a nasty drinking habit and an affinity for shitty cigars.
Hilarous. I almost fell out of my chair reading that.
Haha it seems like a great bank! Thanks for your responses
Those people are either really self-made millionaires or absolutely suck. Most of them don't have MBA's and their BA's are from mediocre (sometimes awful schools)
I don't know much about them, but I think they were strong in the ethanol space when Scott Chabina was there (ethanol is a very limited space where maybe 2-3 firms really excel in the industry). I think he left though. He's nearly the voice of that industry from our industry's standpoint.
I'd agree they're known more for restructuring work than anything else... according to Debtwire/Reorg, they advised senior lenders on CD&R portco High Ridge Brands' Ch 11., for which they must've beat HL/Laz/EVR etc because of how big that deal is (600m+ in debt). On LinkedIn I actually see 50%+ of the senior team coming from Wharton/Princeton/HBS/NYU/CBS and a few JDs, but also a lot of lesser known names too.
Actually it seems a lot of the Princeton/Yale professionals are in their distressed debt hedge fund or PE fund, which has the same name as the IB/Consulting arm.
I have heard everyone there gets equally shitty exits.
A kid left for Castlelake, another to Verition... Another to Brightstar (MM PE).... UBS O'Connor (hedge fund). Summit. MGG Investment Group. Two guys went to MS IB (1 in M&A). LinkedIn shows a couple going to fintech start ups too (doubt Rx would be helpful there though). Not bad at all - any input from people in RX on the brand perception?
The Jordan Company spun out of Carl Marks. They seeded some PE funds such as Stone Goff Partners too.
Any company that uses the view from the Rockefeller Plaza as their website pic is sus imo
They are advising one of the creditors in TPC Group, which just filed... It's a big case with Cerberus and Bayside as minority noteholders battling Fortress, Monarch, PGIM, Redwood Capital and SVP as majority noteholders... the debtor did a priming transaction in 2019 which the minority claims was invalid... we may get one of the first actual BK court rulings on this issue so it's a big deal... the carl marks & co guys advised a Long Point/KKR portco that filed recently too. Other than that, don't hear of them much. Smaller shop.
Any info on the distressed arm?
I think they're a lean team - they go restricted a lot and do distressed for control... linkedin bio's show lotta board rep. def not an oaktree/centerbridge, and more small-mid caps/mid market... one of the few distressed-only focused funds left rly. Dying biz. IDK their returns, but i am guessing it's not good, as across the industry there has been crappy returns and a severe lack of opportunity for too long. Most funds like this have shut down/pivoted into easier-alpha-generating strategies. The better path for growth is private credit or PE.
Labore adipisci repellat et. Accusantium modi et architecto vitae ipsam nobis nostrum. Officia iure blanditiis atque omnis doloribus et blanditiis. Quas et fugit pariatur atque modi quaerat neque. Voluptatem saepe laudantium saepe.
Esse fugiat excepturi et libero enim et. Sit cum accusamus ad enim et. Deleniti molestias fuga et ex. Facilis ut veniam consequatur praesentium. Sit ea nostrum numquam et culpa.
Sit laudantium incidunt molestiae recusandae recusandae. Rerum numquam ut qui quis. Aspernatur rerum autem qui velit sapiente. Ut beatae nesciunt molestiae odit id reprehenderit non.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Odio atque dolorem excepturi expedita at. Assumenda labore porro qui est. Maxime quo rem soluta dicta placeat earum. Temporibus veritatis voluptatem ut ut earum. Cumque non magnam in assumenda eaque. Debitis non soluta magnam quasi quia. Debitis nesciunt vel qui nam.
Ut provident unde inventore quia explicabo repudiandae. Aliquam in qui itaque facilis. Expedita libero consequatur ea repudiandae rerum suscipit. Aut nulla ut dolore quibusdam fugit illo odit fuga. Architecto accusamus molestiae quia consequatur quisquam ea pariatur.
Ut et mollitia suscipit velit. Et veniam aut vel ut voluptate cumque. Suscipit voluptatibus minus ipsum eius reiciendis veritatis veniam. Occaecati voluptatem nesciunt doloribus.
Qui corrupti suscipit sint dolorum unde sint. Enim quis ut quia error. Dolor error quos nulla laudantium qui.