DCF Question

Hi all, this might be a dumb question but would appreciate if you could help with the following:

In a DCF we discount Unlevered FCFs with WACC to arrive at PV of UFCFs. We then sum the PV of UFCFs up, subtract debt and add cash to arrive at Equity Value which we then divide by shares outstanding to arrive at Equity Value per share

If I just discounted Levered FCFs with the Cost of Equity, sum up the PV of LFCFs and divided by shares outstanding, will I arrive at the same number as the above?

10 Comments
 

Yes. Provided there are no mathematical errors in between and you have a constant capital structure for DCF, you should come at the same number.

Unlevered one represents CFs to all stakeholders and is simpler  because you can simply subtract PV of debt and not deal with interest payment every year.

edit: also you have to make sure it is CF to equity. If you have minority interest and preferred stocks with divs, it is a further headache. Lot simpler to subtract everything in PV terms from unlevered.

if you are bullding a 3-statement, you will need to model all the headache anyway. And depending on your assumptions in the future (that impact the elements of the capital structure in some way), slightly different number might occur. But DCF assumes constant capital structure, and it is lot easier by using unlevered.

 

DeWitt23:

You would need to add cash, but I think so, yes. You’d probably get a small difference because in reality your debt/capital ratio isn’t exactly the same for all years, but if that was the case you’d get the same answer.


Why would you add cash if you derive TEqV from LFCF?

 

Because OP posted in his message that when he gets equity value by difference, he takes the PV of UFCF and then substract debt and add cash. If you take the PV of the LFCF, you'd still need to add the cash to get to the same answer. 

 

Totam recusandae amet ipsa. Et accusamus quidem eum nostrum veniam. Vitae laudantium delectus eveniet est. Et et vitae maiores fuga omnis aut accusantium. Sed enim porro culpa natus atque commodi.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan No 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”