Both bbs in the bay seem very similar, I'm finding it hard to differentiate them on strength. Does anyone have any insights into specifics, verticals, culture, exits, etc?
| +134 | Restructuring: Anti-climactic Experience | 36 | 4h |
| +109 | IB Net Worth / Savings Check | 51 | 4h |
| +99 | Woman who emptied Knicks trashcan on street then stole it was DEI exec, worked at JPMorgan Chase | 25 | 1h |
| +81 | Stop sleeping on UBS - it’s pretty good | 29 | 8m |
| +54 | 2026 VAULT PRESTIGE RANKINGS | 30 | 1h |
| +39 | AI + Financial Modelling | 12 | 1d |
| +31 | Hardest interview experiences? | 16 | 1d |
| +28 | Summer before college | 17 | 19h |
| +26 | Current State of UBS in North America | 8 | 2d |
| +23 | Cold apply for FT recruiting? | 5 | 3d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Bump
Bump
Same shit different wrapper
Lmao surely there's some difference, really tryna evaluate both places but haven't been able to chat properly to analysts, so really going off deals and linkedin
GS marginally better
any specific reasons as to why you say that, like is it culture, deals, rep, etc?
In general, GS is considered slightly better than MS.
If you have offers from both, would think about where you'd rather live as the reputational differences are marginal and deal exp will be good / come down to luck at that point. Menlo and SF are pretty different and you can't really feasibly live in one work in the other as a junior.
What is your end goal here? If you want to be a career banker, go with where you think you will fit in with the team the best. If you want PE, both will give you equal looks from the top shops. They're basically the same in terms of reputation and prestige, and only you know yourself well enough to know which one is a better fit for you
congrats on both
Bump, currently AN1 at a lower MM/BB. Considering lateraling, what's the current state of these two groups?
bump
GS SF TMT better imo nowadays - culture, M&A dealflow, and probably location are better vs MS Menlo
Has MS fallen off a bit recently? Feel like in the past MS and GS were almost neck and neck
Del
Do GS. Maximize prestige early on.
Think about what impresses your grandpa’s friends.
HYPSM, GS, McKinsey, or just boat loads of verifiable cash (quant / exited startup).
.
GS is the superior brand nowadays, so would go with GS TMT SF. Deal flow is honestly the same give or take but the Goldman brand is unbeaten
Sit dolor exercitationem facilis. Et sit facilis rem vel itaque aperiam. Quia voluptatibus ex delectus et praesentium modi iste recusandae. Et velit quae laboriosam rem facilis similique itaque. Tempore praesentium voluptates repellat. Voluptatem incidunt amet tempora quasi dolorum maxime.
In velit deleniti et nam quas sed fugit. Ullam quia enim beatae accusamus modi maiores. Exercitationem deleniti temporibus amet suscipit saepe. Corrupti praesentium ipsum aut voluptatem. Incidunt temporibus deleniti ea quo quasi.
Quibusdam aperiam ut illo laudantium dolores ab. Qui atque omnis illo porro. Tempore et saepe commodi quibusdam maiores repudiandae. Esse molestias nostrum a fugiat placeat quia amet. Tempora nisi odio quisquam optio. Praesentium consequuntur eum nihil aspernatur omnis adipisci. Velit exercitationem voluptate tempore eaque suscipit impedit.
Ipsa vero quisquam excepturi. Velit est modi corrupti laboriosam natus est eius. Qui fugit suscipit autem earum earum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...