Investment banking Workbook (Rosenbaum)
I have been working through the workbook, and I notice so many inconsistencies with the #'s its ridiculous! especially during chapter 3 (DCF)
Anyone have the same issue? or did I just buy a bs book.
I have been working through the workbook, and I notice so many inconsistencies with the #'s its ridiculous! especially during chapter 3 (DCF)
Anyone have the same issue? or did I just buy a bs book.
| +267 | Why UBS Is the Worst Place to Start Your IB Career | 40 | 2d |
| +219 | UBS 2nd Year Analyst Q&A (2026) | 41 | 1d |
| +102 | What's your craziest "hardo" story? | 18 | 4h |
| +73 | UBS IB 26Q2 a Disaster! Advisory Revenue Down 23%, Capital MarketsDown 5% | 11 | 4h |
| +53 | Wolf of Wall Street vs. Reality: Anyone else feel scammed by the movies? | 19 | 18h |
| +50 | Suspended for a Year | 21 | 23h |
| +49 | Elite Boutique interview questions | 17 | 2d |
| +37 | so confused about 28 SA timeline | 30 | 14h |
| +34 | Lincoln International Return Offers | 9 | 2h |
| +33 | Rate my non-target resume | 19 | 7h |
Career Resources
I heard similar complaints before about the book. Even if that is true, do you still find it to be a BS book? Do you find that it helpful in terms of practice/knowledge of the book? Id love to know.
I bought the book and complained about it to on here and Amazon simultaneously, and to my surprise Joshua D. Pearl replied (not sure if its actually him or his "peoples"). He doesnt believe me, states someone else sent him a email today, with similar problems and he redid the math, then came to a conclusion that the person was actually wrong not the book.
Makes me reconsider whether I am doing the math wrong but I doubt it. Sent him an email with a image of at least 3 simple errors on one page.
http://s17.postimg.org/id5unslrz/WP_20150125_001.jpg
c. states answer is 209.4 million from 4127.8 millions x 5.1% I am assuming 5.1% = .051 (I hope) so 4127.8* .051 = 210.5178. Not 209.4
f. 3931.3* 8% = 314.504 not 313.4
g. same things.
There are plenty more errors, that makes everything really confusing, especially when you are using previous answers as variables for the next question, and the next question (like problem d. 560 ... 217.8 are wrong.) Soon, #'s are just so far off. Even when you use the books' answers for future questions its still wrong. Its ridiculous.
Aside from that, I like the book, I am learning and the differences between my answers and the ones from the book, makes me think a little more. BUT It is very frustrating especially since I consider myself new to finance, and I want a definite answer to help me know I am doing things correctly not a stupid #$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$ number.
Short answer,
Great book, need the workbook to capitalize on the info. not sure about the cd since I dont have that.
Libero assumenda in est et architecto commodi minima eum. Eos quis ipsa nam consectetur ut. Nihil accusantium enim praesentium rerum.
Libero et magni autem blanditiis provident. In sed sunt rerum et quia aut. Libero labore id exercitationem aut fuga.
Nihil quod nam at suscipit iste. Cumque voluptatem aut repudiandae sunt possimus quod. Natus qui explicabo molestiae et iusto magni.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...