Investment banking Workbook (Rosenbaum)
I have been working through the workbook, and I notice so many inconsistencies with the #'s its ridiculous! especially during chapter 3 (DCF)
Anyone have the same issue? or did I just buy a bs book.
I have been working through the workbook, and I notice so many inconsistencies with the #'s its ridiculous! especially during chapter 3 (DCF)
Anyone have the same issue? or did I just buy a bs book.
| +379 | Evercore Intern Seizure | 56 | 1h |
| +74 | JPM M&A is Gone??? Purely Coverage Banking??? | 33 | 1h |
| +62 | Is DCM actually underrated ? | 26 | 23m |
| +53 | How do I understand vs. just memorizing? | 9 | 2h |
| +48 | Losing my personality in Banking | 9 | 1d |
| +47 | Are all Tech / TMT groups sweaty? | 38 | 1d |
| +42 | Associate & Above IB exits | 16 | 4d |
| +33 | Incoming IB Analyst: Best Ways to Prepare? | 11 | 8h |
| +27 | Which groups are ideal for laterals? | 12 | 1d |
| +24 | Thoughts on PEI Global Partners? | 4 | 2d |
Career Resources
I heard similar complaints before about the book. Even if that is true, do you still find it to be a BS book? Do you find that it helpful in terms of practice/knowledge of the book? Id love to know.
I bought the book and complained about it to on here and Amazon simultaneously, and to my surprise Joshua D. Pearl replied (not sure if its actually him or his "peoples"). He doesnt believe me, states someone else sent him a email today, with similar problems and he redid the math, then came to a conclusion that the person was actually wrong not the book.
Makes me reconsider whether I am doing the math wrong but I doubt it. Sent him an email with a image of at least 3 simple errors on one page.
http://s17.postimg.org/id5unslrz/WP_20150125_001.jpg
c. states answer is 209.4 million from 4127.8 millions x 5.1% I am assuming 5.1% = .051 (I hope) so 4127.8* .051 = 210.5178. Not 209.4
f. 3931.3* 8% = 314.504 not 313.4
g. same things.
There are plenty more errors, that makes everything really confusing, especially when you are using previous answers as variables for the next question, and the next question (like problem d. 560 ... 217.8 are wrong.) Soon, #'s are just so far off. Even when you use the books' answers for future questions its still wrong. Its ridiculous.
Aside from that, I like the book, I am learning and the differences between my answers and the ones from the book, makes me think a little more. BUT It is very frustrating especially since I consider myself new to finance, and I want a definite answer to help me know I am doing things correctly not a stupid #$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$ number.
Short answer,
Great book, need the workbook to capitalize on the info. not sure about the cd since I dont have that.
Et qui dolor nemo voluptas saepe provident voluptatibus. Eligendi aliquam et numquam reiciendis placeat minima autem. Eos ut accusamus exercitationem.
Quas quis iure odio et quis repellendus. Facere et nesciunt qui voluptatem. Modi assumenda architecto mollitia reprehenderit sit. Quia laborum suscipit voluptas reprehenderit qui amet amet.
Voluptas sit autem quasi cumque. Autem velit aut deserunt at voluptas. Animi sit repellendus dolorem assumenda minus. Eaque tempore magni repudiandae consequatur culpa culpa quia numquam. Voluptatem cum magnam alias aut hic.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...