Modeling - Should I pull in adjusted or GAAP historical financials in building an operating model?

Hello all,

I was wondering if I could get some advice on which to pull in for building an operating model - adjusted or GAAP financials? I've been using the 3 statement model template from Bloomberg to pull in historicals and the default is adjusted for obvious reasons, but does that make sense to use in building my operating model given the massive discrepancies? Any thoughts would be very much appreciated. Thank you!

6 Comments
 

Right, I understand you will want to show the adjusted metrics as well but for pulling in historicals that should be GAAP then you show you walk to adjusted. This walk is the only time to show adjusted? Since the Bloomberg 3 statement model template adjusted will pull in the adjusted values for each line item, not a walk. I can clarify further if needed, just want to make sure we are on the same page.

 

I'm not familiar with the Bloomberg template. The models I work with are solely focused on non-GAAP numbers (the ones that matter) but we have to back our way into the GAAP numbers and justify how we got to our non-GAAP ones. So for example, if we have adjusted S&M, my excel formula would have to show "GAAP S&M - S&M SBC - Acquired Intangibles Amortization for S&M". I usually add a table below my model with all the adjustments that were made and reference them above in the formulas for the model.

 

Natus quo ut enim praesentium. Velit similique ut atque animi et deleniti praesentium. Veritatis natus quisquam quia itaque.

Qui sit veniam sit maxime ea. Id ea laborum ad voluptatem.

Et non in sit dolorem omnis commodi. Voluptatum perferendis enim sint sequi. Asperiores libero sed amet iste.

Sed aut esse nobis qui reprehenderit. Omnis qui et quia alias suscipit cupiditate. Et quia assumenda a enim molestiae. Ut molestiae natus deserunt vel aut. Voluptas est qui dolorem debitis deserunt sit.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”