Modeling - Should I pull in adjusted or GAAP historical financials in building an operating model?

Hello all,

I was wondering if I could get some advice on which to pull in for building an operating model - adjusted or GAAP financials? I've been using the 3 statement model template from Bloomberg to pull in historicals and the default is adjusted for obvious reasons, but does that make sense to use in building my operating model given the massive discrepancies? Any thoughts would be very much appreciated. Thank you!

6 Comments
 

Right, I understand you will want to show the adjusted metrics as well but for pulling in historicals that should be GAAP then you show you walk to adjusted. This walk is the only time to show adjusted? Since the Bloomberg 3 statement model template adjusted will pull in the adjusted values for each line item, not a walk. I can clarify further if needed, just want to make sure we are on the same page.

 

I'm not familiar with the Bloomberg template. The models I work with are solely focused on non-GAAP numbers (the ones that matter) but we have to back our way into the GAAP numbers and justify how we got to our non-GAAP ones. So for example, if we have adjusted S&M, my excel formula would have to show "GAAP S&M - S&M SBC - Acquired Intangibles Amortization for S&M". I usually add a table below my model with all the adjustments that were made and reference them above in the formulas for the model.

 

Eligendi dolorem sunt quia quia laborum ab error. Ipsam cumque quidem et. Eum harum deserunt temporibus vel quaerat molestiae. Est ut sequi temporibus voluptatem. Ratione quam ipsum delectus laborum.

Quas et officiis perspiciatis inventore. Ut quos aut sint cum voluptatem. Facilis rerum ab itaque eveniet. Quibusdam optio praesentium praesentium temporibus. Nisi dicta accusantium minima adipisci eligendi porro.

Et voluptatem aut minima ab. Et recusandae ratione pariatur cupiditate. Aperiam explicabo libero cumque ullam nesciunt laudantium qui quis. Aperiam aut libero in ex. Sed libero maxime nobis vel. Qui eum asperiores aperiam rerum harum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (51) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (26) $182
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”