98 Comments
 
Most Helpful

Wow that's amazing. Wonder where all the disgruntled folks are who were slinging MS at kids for just saying direct FT conversions were even possibility. I remember explicitly saying that certain EBs are most likely to do this due to their already 85%+ return rates and relatively small class sizes and I was told by all these so-called experts that there was "100% no chance" of this happening.

 

Moelis has historically had bigger class sizes compared to other EBs, no? Regardless, this is an unexpected but amazing move by the firm.

 

Nope, that's Evercore. Moelis, IMO, seems the most "safe" place to be, at least as an Associate given that they do both M&A and Rx out of their generalist pool (IDK about Analysts). Rx has a ton of deal flow so there will definitely be work to do for the interns to justify keeping the summer program, especially when 2nd year Analysts leave for PE

 

Wow congrats to those going to Moelis. I think it's far likely for boutiques with strong RX platforms to do this - wouldn't expect BB to do this at all.

 

Really tho? I mean, if Moelis takes ~20 summer associates and traditionally has an 80% FT offer rate, it's really only given out 4 more associate offers than it normally would have. Would that really entail them to cut summer'21 recruiting entirely? I can understand if it's decreases slightly, but not an 'RIP Summer'21' situation, unless I'm missing something?

Not disagreeing, genuinely curious...

 

I was definitely being overly dramatic. Think that recruiting will be down for MBAs next year anyway due to the current downturn (my base case is that the economy won't be back up to speed by the time MBA offers are given out in early-January). So if banks were going to have a small class due to the economic situation and they are also carrying a larger than normal class from the year prior, I think it's looking pretty lean. Tons of flawed assumptions in there but that's just how I'm thinking of it.

 

Sadly their EMEA operations are not performing as well ... I doubt the same happens to their EMEA cohort

 

Could they afford reputationally to only do this for some regions though? just curious. It feels as if they do it for one region they must do it for the others as well. Have there been instances thus far where banks, that have already announced certain policies for the summers, have decided on different policies for different regions? genuine question bc I don't know

 

Hard to accurately judge interns in 4 weeks, so they're giving them the benefit of the doubt and extending FT offers. The global pandemic wasn't the interns' fault. EBs also tend to have high conversion rates (~80%+), so this really isn't that much more of an expense for them, compared to what it would be for, say, a BB

It's also good PR / avoids bad PR, since it shows they care about their people, etc. Like someone above mentioned, it's very possible they chose to act first out of their EB competitors to offset some of the negative publicity they received last year from that staffer email. Others feel free to add, just my $0.02

 
Controversial

Very good friends with some guys at Moelis, and from hearing their stories, I have a feeling this isn't going to be 100% conversion rate. Moelis loves to throw the kitchen sink at people, and I can see the "virtual 4 weeks" as just an onslaught of modeling tests and mock pitch presentations.

Last year they hit them with an intern case assignment in one of the busiest weeks of the summer, and were not lenient at all with the grading, giving Ds and Fs on the models and pitchbooks the interns put together.

If you read the email (posted on Litquidity IG), it says "successful completion" of intern program. I have a feeling they are going to try and weed a few people out - not as many as normal - but I think a few will get dinged.

 

Agree with this. Have heard similar things from those I know already at Moelis and two incoming FTs. Best of luck to the incoming SAs who think this means they get a cakewalk to an offer lol

 

Guess we'll find out come August - obviously this is pure conjecture - the summer was such a god damn slog for those poor bastards last year. Legit had it worse than every other group on the street, prob only tied with JPM M&A. I just can't reconcile that experience with this University of Phoenix online class that is getting pitched.

Who tf knows what the deal is.

 

I'm an incoming intern at Moelis and can confirm everyone got explicit full-time offers, regardless of performance on any "case studies" given during the virtual internship. Offer is just contingent on completing the internship a.ka. not doing something stupid to get you fired mid-way.

 

Did they give you guys a deadline for deciding? Curious about these actual and potential FT offers -- will SAs still have ability/desire to explore other options?

 

Didn’t the kids sign a summer contract? If so, then will the contract be revised? If new or addendum to contract, my guess is that there will probably be some contingencies to the FT offer.

 

Could other EBs follow? Couldn't really see BBs as conversions are never even close to 100%, but maybe for EB

 

I wouldn’t be surprised if other EBs followed. Low risk given the high offer rates and potentially huge reward to differentiate themselves from BBs + good PR for future recruiting classes. I think if at least one more does this the rest will follow suit... can’t be the only one not doing it when you’re competing for talent.

 

i guess from the firm's perspective it's also great that they can retain talent by signing them on early! this pretty much prevents ppl from trying to lateral into competitors / buyside for ft

 

Anyone have any advice on how to study for technicals/ if we should expect a lot of stuff from outside the guide for Moelis SA 2021?

 

Quae sunt numquam voluptatem iste quis et numquam libero. Quaerat nulla similique doloribus. Qui quae dolorum commodi nesciunt. Est at ut quia asperiores quia minima rem voluptatem. Iure rerum velit optio quia. Voluptatem est saepe cumque ducimus cum. Ea dolor impedit ut sint. Ut earum dolorem aut unde dolore quasi eveniet.

Dicta doloremque porro fuga dolor repellendus quo voluptate. Et animi perferendis ea labore fugit. Ut ut necessitatibus neque nulla distinctio voluptatem.

Sit autem asperiores alias soluta porro assumenda necessitatibus. Laudantium nostrum delectus vel dignissimos perferendis accusantium quibusdam. Minus iure mollitia in suscipit numquam odio dignissimos. Fuga nam porro omnis officia eaque totam.

Rerum sed eos harum beatae repellat natus repellat. Assumenda earum dolor aperiam recusandae id. Eum vel modi molestias error dolor provident.

 

Exercitationem pariatur totam atque qui vel odio autem dolore. Neque assumenda nobis laudantium molestiae quia autem cumque. Quibusdam deleniti autem doloremque officiis ut labore. Sunt dolores explicabo ut nemo. Qui possimus voluptatum quasi animi voluptatem. Iusto asperiores autem omnis odio quae similique.

Ea odio eos debitis. Qui aut aperiam facere neque sequi non. Reiciendis voluptatem distinctio sed minima aut. Similique nemo asperiores et sint ea occaecati. Minima et quo autem quo quos.

Doloremque cumque blanditiis fuga quia sint odio quae. Temporibus quia rerum enim nam. Placeat quae culpa dolor explicabo ut delectus consequatur.

Temporibus error dolore temporibus odit dignissimos. Sit necessitatibus consequuntur sit cumque. Aut labore et non est eius. Consequatur nobis consequatur sunt praesentium provident ipsum.

 

Veniam dolor dolorem molestiae. Mollitia error quas reprehenderit. Dignissimos eos amet sit animi corporis. Est nisi quam aut perspiciatis neque hic.

Quod dicta ea vel. Vel quia adipisci error debitis.

Aspernatur similique fugit et amet. Et rerum maiores ad itaque eaque odio sit. Dolores et voluptatem aut at. Eos cum doloribus cupiditate.

 

Vero facere accusamus et eius. Odit temporibus et dolores doloremque. Sed incidunt est vitae fugiat totam est omnis provident. Labore voluptatem est in omnis molestiae tempore. Debitis alias itaque esse consequatur laborum unde.

Et dolores quo molestiae. Officia vero libero eos facere. Voluptatem perferendis ut eligendi quia quia repellendus amet ut.

Praesentium labore maiores nisi ut quo nesciunt. Nemo culpa illum soluta fugit sit aliquam quia. Quisquam quibusdam eum sunt aut harum laboriosam. Fugiat molestiae esse distinctio voluptatibus omnis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”