24 Comments
 
Most Helpful

At this point MM pay considerably more than bulge brackets. My understanding is that Baird/Blair/HW type banks are comping their juniors very nicely, and it makes sense - tons of MM deal flow over the past few years, less internal bullshit and back office to pay, and non public too so there is no shareholder scrutiny. Honestly if you are a career banker it’s kind of the place to be IMO

 

Am at a mid-tier BB and can tell you that while we got absolutely railed on bonuses and I wish I was at any one of the other banks that actually comped their analysts, I still have an amazing job lined up that I know MM analysts would have 0 shot at interviewing for.

Wrote some replies about this before but every interview I was invited to during recruiting was either MF or UMM, and I almost certainly wouldn’t have gotten those looks at other banks (besides EBs). But most of the kids I spoke with who were interviewing were from GS/MS, with a few sprinkled in from JPM/CS/EVR/etc.

 

I never really understood the criticism by some outlets on IB salaries. Sure, you are making ~150k, but aren’t you also working 80+ hours a week? Isn’t the median starting salary for top universities (where most banks hire from) around 70k-89k?

So if a normal 40 hour a week job for that demographic pays 70k, why is it so unacceptable that people effectively working two jobs get paid, well, two salaries?

 

Just off the top of my head I can think of 2 good reasons why this argument is shit:

  1. Marginal value on additional earnings: additional earnings are taxed higher, meaning you are actually making less of the second salary post-tax. You might keep ~$60k of the first $75k, and ~$45k of the second $75k.
  1. Marginal value on additional hours worked: every hour worked over a certain amount has an increasing marginal value. For example:
  • If I’m working 40 hours a week, every hour you add on top of that is a huge loss of value (that’s your personal free time and the only time you have to decompress)
  • From 50-70 hours you lose the ability to do stuff after work (get dinner with friends, go to classes, etc.)
  • At 80 hours, you can’t work out consistently or cook so you have to order meals
  • At 90 hours you’re missing sleep
  • At 100+ hours you have no weekends and can’t see your friends/SO

So the first 40 hours of work are worth a lot less than the second 40 hours of work, which have a higher marginal value. When I’ve gone from 70 hours at work to 90, my health and happiness drop off a cliff.

 

What? What an awful way to counter my position. As a mof I don’t even think you have said anything that actually goes against what I discuss. My comment literally only said that IB pays so much because you are basically working two jobs, to which you reply that:

1) You pay more taxes because of tax brackets: Well bud, even if you worked 1 hour and made 150k you would still pay the same amount of taxes, idk what you are trying to say with this but it doesn’t correlate at all with me justifying the salary itself.

2) That the hours you work after the first 40 imply more sacrifices:

Again, so someone working two jobs wouldn’t have this issue? As a mof how does this have anything to do with me thinking IB salaries are fair? If anything your off-topic explanation on what marginal value is would justify my stance: bankers are actually underpaid bc the 80th hour should carry a higher pay as to balance the cost of opportunity.

Now beyond this I will mention that idk if you misread what I said, but you have yet to prove anything about my argument (which would be reasons why bankers should not make that much money). Kinda sound like someone who just learnt what marginal value is + doesn’t wanna work long hours bc its not worth it for you. Both items irrelevant to my comment tbh

 

Animi rem aut repellendus aut. Quasi exercitationem deleniti quibusdam accusamus. Eum occaecati unde voluptas maxime necessitatibus ut iure. Omnis aut voluptatem sunt eius asperiores cupiditate aspernatur.

Atque laborum vel ipsum quisquam. At dolores reprehenderit aut magnam nobis perferendis quae. Sequi odio et aliquid voluptatem quia voluptatem aut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”