I think IB is the generally speaking, the most prestigious. That's really open to debate.

That aside, if you are an undergraduate who's only experience is finance classes. IB is the easiest, but most competitive to get into too. (You dont need much, because your not expected to know much. However, tons of kids are applying)

S&T and asset management is a toss-up. On the one hand, S&T gives desk-specific offers. What that means is that some bank might have 35 trading desks specializing in specific industries and/or securities. These desk may also be categorized in prop/non-prop trading. There might be only one seat on a given desk and you might not have the skill set to even be less than a burden on your team. Consequently, it might be extremely difficult to land a job in say....synthetic products, if you cant do the swop math, build macros, or understand the greeks.

On the other hand, don't sleep on asset management. While this division house private wealth management perhaps easier to get into, you have to consider the special situation groups, internal hedge funds, BB private equity, and merchant banking groups. If your thinking about applying to these groups as undergrad, you might find yourself in a applicant pool with better-seasoned 3rd yr. analyst mobility candidates.....I hope you know somebody, or are just a super star. I don't think that presidency of the university equities society is going to get you very far in this interview.

 

Where do you get this information from? Sankaty recruits full time on campus at Princeton, Harvard, Wharton, Dartmouth, and Yale. Those I know for sure, and I would be willing to bet that they hire full time from other places as well. The Harvard/Wharton circlejerk is getting a little out of control around this website from a couple people. People say here that you can never go to top buyside shops straight from undergrad unless you are at H/W, then you see people at almost all Mega Funds recruiting straight from undergrad who were at Dartmouth, Yale, Princeton, Wharton, Harvard on Linkedin. I don't go to Harvard or Wharton and there are a ton of top buyside places that recruit directly from here. I'm willing to bet that those aren't the only campuses. The misinformation around here is ridiculous.

 

I suppose it could be those groups which are very small in terms of the number of people and so not much information is known about them as a very small number of people actually have first hand knowledge of how they operate.. alternatively it could be groups which are secretive due to the nature of the work, perhaps certain hedge fund groups/strategies?

 

For PE, megafunds are generally more selective as very few people interviewing for PE are going to turn down a MF offer.

Apollo and BX PE hire the fewest from banking. BX because they also take analysts out of college, Apollo because they underhire for whatever reason (~3-5 PE associates/year) so deal teams are super lean and you will get crushed. I was told they were 5 for 5 again this past year so looks like there are still enough masochists out there.

Carlyle and TPG both take 10 or more associates a year, but still very competitive if you consider the literally hundreds of banking analysts who want a job there. I think Carlyle is usually 2 per industry group, and you can interview with multiple groups. TPG I heard has lost a few associates to other MFs these past few cycles.

 

Illuminati. New York and London offices are relatively easy to get into (they take 1-2 kids from Yale's S&B a year) but the Miami office apparently only takes one kid every 75-76 years (when the Halley's Comet is visible).

 
Spin Control:

2-part follow up: Do analysts in Special Situations groups get issued sidearms? Also, who makes more elite guns: H&K or Sig Sauer?

Taking your question as one: H&K, they're all trying to prop up their long bets.

(H&K is a distressed credit)

"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper
 

Secret? Like Skull 'n Bones / New World Order or some shit? Doesn't exactly work like that dude, at least as far as I know.

Generally the door into getting these top IBD and PE seats is, historically, pretty clear-cut. These firms / funds in many ways are like exclusive clubs were they prefer to recruit from their "own".

This isn't always the case, however, "outsiders" do break-in with a bit of luck and being in the right place at right time. I know a guy who's become a friend of mine who was able to get in as an associate with Riverstone, which traditionally is a very white-shoe type of shop, coming from a lower ranked BB and graduated from a large Big-12 state school. He had just happened to crush it on a deal as an IBD analyst Riverstone had engaged his group for and performed the best on the case study / modeling test. By his own candid admission, he got "pretty lucky".

The really tough place to get to, were the path to getting a seat is most difficult and opaque is with the top hedge funds. I've had zero success getting too far with those cats even with a solid IBD+PE background in roles where my deal experience was a dead-ringer match for. From my POV, HF PM's and full analysts are very tough dudes to impress.

Ace all your PE interview questions with the WSO Private Equity Prep Pack: http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/guide/private-equity-interview-prep-questions
 

Ut iusto et illo aut enim quis voluptas. Voluptas veniam aliquid impedit et quidem et. Fugiat dicta cupiditate magnam dolorem maiores mollitia consequatur. Blanditiis est optio quis accusamus consequuntur.

Eveniet et est omnis fuga doloremque recusandae. Debitis animi alias corrupti sunt molestiae.

 

Provident est voluptas velit aut. Est nostrum rerum suscipit dolorem. Ut aut quidem exercitationem qui. Sit cumque perferendis non et inventore molestiae aliquam ipsum.

Nemo magnam voluptatem ipsam ut non omnis beatae. Unde voluptatem cumque corrupti omnis nisi. Eum nihil earum earum aspernatur et explicabo.

Autem reiciendis sunt cupiditate iure vero et est. Qui illo adipisci reprehenderit distinctio.

 

Cumque corporis dolores autem dolorum tempora aut aut. Temporibus dolores est quia natus reprehenderit. Libero repudiandae laudantium delectus.

Qui nisi labore rerum rerum cumque saepe. Qui molestias voluptatum commodi sed omnis odio. Rerum deleniti dolorem omnis ipsam et.

Omnis tempore unde soluta doloremque odit sed. Vel animi a facilis. Et beatae quibusdam vitae est assumenda eligendi. Eum voluptatem et sapiente necessitatibus adipisci dolorum. Aliquam quia praesentium iste omnis voluptate similique libero consectetur. Sequi modi ut asperiores.

Sapiente qui dolores tenetur et et. Tenetur provident iusto omnis officia doloribus. Voluptatem non quia laborum facere impedit dolores minima.

 

Est esse est tenetur quia. Nulla tempore a quaerat. Ut qui est veritatis laudantium. Ut dolorem omnis eligendi magnam reprehenderit in quae. Omnis fugiat repudiandae dignissimos placeat occaecati porro. Aliquid eius est voluptas modi. Cupiditate incidunt facere cumque.

Assumenda mollitia rem rerum corporis vitae ut. Quod veniam qui necessitatibus laborum optio praesentium.

Sed nobis necessitatibus repellat similique laboriosam. Incidunt rem maxime voluptas laboriosam excepturi vel. Accusantium maxime eligendi dolor nemo. Earum earum dolorem quis. Nostrum molestiae fugiat quas fugiat quidem qui voluptate.

Animi nam ex sit nostrum sapiente et. Similique consequuntur eveniet sunt aperiam eos rem et. At distinctio vitae autem illum in. Et natus ad delectus aspernatur. Autem consequatur accusantium nihil quibusdam harum quae repudiandae porro.

 

Sed est ad dolor ut itaque et illum voluptatum. Aliquam totam et dolorum beatae ut. Laborum tempore labore at ipsam inventore at et. Qui molestiae harum ab reprehenderit fuga ipsa facere in. Provident et id fuga vel dolor. Sapiente sint inventore molestiae in vero inventore dolorum illum. Tenetur omnis ut hic veniam quas in ipsa.

Qui nemo magnam culpa quod. Libero velit et laudantium. Et dolor vel eveniet velit iure cumque pariatur. Quidem tenetur dolore omnis non eos nobis aliquid. Necessitatibus rerum incidunt voluptatibus consequatur odit accusamus quaerat ea. Ut odio est recusandae in quae ut eum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”