P/CFPS vs. EV/EBITDA
Regarding relative valuation for the equity of a company, should both of these be used or just one since they are both cash flow multiples?
Regarding relative valuation for the equity of a company, should both of these be used or just one since they are both cash flow multiples?
| +172 | Worlds Worst MDs Competition (2026 Edition) | 33 | 2h |
| +172 | Who Killed Wall Street | 54 | 2m |
| +163 | As Lehman people reconvene at UBS, Barclays needs to hire (2023) | 23 | 3d |
| +117 | Lindsay Clancy - Thoughts from A2 | 22 | 5h |
| +94 | Day at Macquarie | 12 | 3d |
| +54 | How bad did I mess up | 11 | 1h |
| +42 | EB (EVR/CVP/LAZ) vs MBB (Bain/BCG) | 20 | 1d |
| +38 | Misrepresented Houston IB | 14 | 4d |
| +34 | Most technical groups? | 18 | 10h |
| +33 | How bad is leaving after a few months | 12 | 2h |
Career Resources
EV/EBITDA is not a cash flow multiple
Your question lacks context. EV/EBITDA and P/CFPS look at two completely different things and are non-mutually exclusive to each other. Unlike P/CFPS (dependent on market movement), EV/EBITDA is a "non-market" valuation multiple, and would appropriately be used in the case of a capital-intensive company with substantially large D&A expenses.
what the fuck are you talking about? EV/EBITDA multiples are certainly market driven. it changes daily, just like price per share does. how the fuck do you think you arrive at EV? I'll give you a hint, equity value is in that calc. and oh wait, equity value is the numerator in the other multiple OP was referring to. you should be banned from commenting.
Take a deep breath
i fucking lol'd bro
Me gusta
I am talking about what the maindifferences are between deriving a target share price from a relative P/CFPS approach vs. deriving a target share price from a relative EV/EBITDA multiple (obviously backing into an equity value from your calculated Enterprise Value)
Read this: //www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/ebitda-vs-operating-cash-flow-vs-free-ca…
"The key OPERATIONAL distinction between EBITDA and CFO/OCF is the Change in Net Working Capital. CFO/OCF are also burdened by taxes and interest expense."
Suscipit laboriosam fugiat ut dicta vero consequatur laborum. Et alias illo modi. Debitis ex velit maxime magnam officiis ab. Eligendi placeat voluptate consequatur harum rerum aut laborum. Amet nulla harum voluptatem.
Quo et accusantium praesentium praesentium et recusandae saepe cupiditate. Nesciunt odio similique fuga explicabo. Quasi quibusdam eaque est excepturi quos ex quae. Minima minima magnam pariatur. Dignissimos illum nostrum impedit quia at voluptatem. Omnis ipsam culpa et esse.
Dolor voluptatibus modi consequatur quo nemo ad voluptatem vero. Rem vel harum temporibus voluptatibus. Dolor ullam a cupiditate modi. Reprehenderit non alias sapiente explicabo impedit id.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...