P/CFPS vs. EV/EBITDA
Regarding relative valuation for the equity of a company, should both of these be used or just one since they are both cash flow multiples?
Regarding relative valuation for the equity of a company, should both of these be used or just one since they are both cash flow multiples?
| +298 | UBS Tech MD hires Son (from no-name college) as an Intern | 51 | 8h |
| +103 | The Intern Starter Pack | 20 | 8h |
| +77 | [Official] 2026 IB Analyst Bonus Megathread (with 2025 Consolidated Pay and Perks/Benefits) | 11 | 1d |
| +55 | Perella Weinberg to Cut 10% of Workforce, Including Partners | 35 | 1d |
| +46 | Are all Tech / TMT groups sweaty? | 25 | 17m |
| +40 | UBS Groups Ranked by Future Outlook | 20 | 3d |
| +39 | Is DCM actually underrated ? | 15 | 3h |
| +33 | PWP Layoffs????? | 18 | 5d |
| +32 | UVA McIntire vs Cornell Dyson for IB | 19 | 1d |
| +29 | Are search funds just wage-c**k factories? | 11 | 18h |
Career Resources
EV/EBITDA is not a cash flow multiple
Your question lacks context. EV/EBITDA and P/CFPS look at two completely different things and are non-mutually exclusive to each other. Unlike P/CFPS (dependent on market movement), EV/EBITDA is a "non-market" valuation multiple, and would appropriately be used in the case of a capital-intensive company with substantially large D&A expenses.
what the fuck are you talking about? EV/EBITDA multiples are certainly market driven. it changes daily, just like price per share does. how the fuck do you think you arrive at EV? I'll give you a hint, equity value is in that calc. and oh wait, equity value is the numerator in the other multiple OP was referring to. you should be banned from commenting.
Take a deep breath
i fucking lol'd bro
Me gusta
I am talking about what the maindifferences are between deriving a target share price from a relative P/CFPS approach vs. deriving a target share price from a relative EV/EBITDA multiple (obviously backing into an equity value from your calculated Enterprise Value)
Read this: //www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/ebitda-vs-operating-cash-flow-vs-free-ca…
"The key OPERATIONAL distinction between EBITDA and CFO/OCF is the Change in Net Working Capital. CFO/OCF are also burdened by taxes and interest expense."
Praesentium aperiam aut aut quidem unde. Repudiandae natus qui quis et doloremque dolore placeat. Est ut nam quo dolorem reprehenderit saepe. Rem ut iure ut pariatur.
Reiciendis expedita quod possimus in. Dolore cupiditate architecto dignissimos consequuntur quos.
Veritatis qui dicta et. Omnis dolor reprehenderit unde expedita. Nulla ut accusamus hic nam odit. Aperiam fugit quo aut. Dolores maxime dolor et temporibus commodi deleniti ab.
Consequatur ut velit est itaque rem. Est quis enim repellat quibusdam recusandae repellendus corrupti. Sapiente eum ut aut optio exercitationem natus. Ut eligendi maxime aut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...