Thoughts on Guggenheim in 22/23?

Just started an MBA at a IB target wanted to get thoughts on the current state of Guggenheim. Saw the post on "Another Way To Classify Boutiques" and found it be helpful since there's less information available about these firms at our school. We send a few kids to Guggenheim every year, Lazard Evercore and Moelis recruit on campus as well but we don't have much of a pipeline to Centerview/ PJT. The below comment doesn't paint a great picture of the firm and I'm curious if others echo this sentiment. Looked at the recent transactions on their website and was surprised to see the number of financing mandates (>50%), non-RX  advisory mandates also seem to be mostly in the sub-500m bucket going back 5-6 pages. They don't have a team/ bios page, so it's tough to pin down where senior bankers came from and what they cover

More or less. Pre GFC, Guggenheim was really just a money manager, and a good one at that, Scott mineard and $300bn in AUM. Then came Alan Schwartz and his buddies from Bear. At the outset they did pretty well, cracking Top 10 US M&A in ~2014-2016. The problem is they employed an eat what you kill commission based model with a sparse set of rainmakers from across the street who had no vested interest in the development of the firm (culture, people, recruiting etc.) and a lack of a strong internal network. If you look at the other new wave EBs they all have a strong core group of bankers who collectively lead the platform:

CVP - Effron and his faction of the old UBS

Moelis - Ken and his faction of the old UBS

PJT - Taubman and his MS M&A and MediComms posse 


It's still a good place to work and the comp is great. But they're deal flow has significantly weakened. They did well last year but as the saying goes "when the tide goes out, you can see who's swimming naked". Not a LT whore, but 30 deals and $8bn in volume this year speaks for itself 

20 Comments
 

Gugg is a solid firm but they are not an independent advisor. Exit ops are fine and you can always lateral to a better bank. That being said, Gugg has other tentacles in research, s&t, investment, etc so most people regard it more as a full service bank rather than a boutique. From a legacy perspective, well they have Scott Minerd but he’s not in IB

 

Solid shop like others have said but not an advisor to blue chip corporates. Have definitely moved down market in recent years with their MM build out in Atlanta, Chicago and Boston. Good comp at the Associate level. If you’re goal is to just do a year or two and exit to industry I wouldn’t be too concerned but ultimately in this industry you are your deal sheet 

 

I know they're significantly lower than they have been in past, but I think Gugg was ranked something like 18 last year in overall deal volume. So to those who say they "peaked" 5 years ago, not sure that's the case. Could be that this year is just an anomaly. 

 

They did this at my MBA program as well in order to ensure their yield, the % of their offers that were accepted. If you’re good candidate (you’ll know this as the process winds down based on Interview invites and other factors) then I’d go through the main process and not worry. Only saw middling candidates take the early bait, a few other banks employ this tactic 

 
Most Helpful

As you mentioned, Guggenheim was a strong US M&A player around 4-7 years ago but has slipped since. Not sure they were ever overhyped given their compensation and huge mandates such as Disney / Fox, IBM / Red Hat, etc.

They're particularly good in TMT, HC, and RX. Other groups aren't bad - they did a $3BN energy sell-side a few months ago and hired the head of consumer from Rothschild

All that being said, there has been a lot of turnover at the senior level. For example, SVB took one of their rainmaker HC MDs to build out their practice. Gugg has also been expanding their middle market group, which is one of the reasons why you're seeing smaller deals compared to before. The other big reason is just the general market downturn. 

These banks (non BBs, independent advisors, EBs, whatever you want to call them) tend to heavily shift around the league tables, so it's hard to evaluate on a year-by-year basis. Overall, I'd say Gugg is a solid platform and if you're in one of their stronger groups, you'll have a great career.

 

Eum consequatur et doloremque dolore. Voluptatem quasi quo ex commodi nemo ipsa. Saepe consequuntur saepe labore facilis sit aspernatur nihil. Accusantium eum assumenda quibusdam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (48) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”